On Mon, 12 May 2008 12:59:24 -0700 (PDT), Jerry Kraus
yahoo.com> wrote:
>On May 12, 2:57Â pm, beelzebub yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On May 12, 1:48 pm, Jerry Kraus yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On May 12, 2:43 pm, beelzebub yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> On May 11, 5:14 pm, DanielSan gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>> beelzebub wrote:
>>>>>> On May 11, 3:07 pm, Free Lunch wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sun, 11 May 2008 13:54:34 -0700 (PDT), Jerry Kraus
>>
>>>>>>>> Splendid. Â YOU define Atheism, Mr. Atheist.
>>>>>>> The lack of belief in gods.
>>
>>>> [beelzebub corrected the semantic argument]
>>
>>>>>> The belief that there is no god, actually.
>>
>>>>> The lack of belief in gods, actually.
>>
>>>> 1. Â Do you believe in God?
>>
>>>> 2. Â Do you believe that there is a god, or gods?
>>
>>>> Answer both, without skirting the issue.
>>
>>> You must define God. Â Otherwise, how can the question be accurately
>>> answered?
>>
>> Define it however you choose (upper or lowercase). Â It is immaterial
>> to the question--when posed to an atheist. Â The question is posed to
>> atheists.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
>So, you're saying Atheists just don't like the word "God"? They don't
>care what it means? Just remove that word from the dictionaries, and
>Atheists will be happy?
nope. We still won't believe people who claim there are gods without
proof.
>
>Doesn't sound like much of a philosophy!
It's not supposed to be a philosophy.
surprise!