beelzebub wrote:
> On May 12, 7:01 pm, Free Lunch wrote:
>> On Mon, 12 May 2008 17:27:07 -0700 (PDT), beelzebub
>>
>> yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> On May 12, 4:53 pm, Free Lunch wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 12 May 2008 13:00:08 -0700 (PDT), beelzebub
>>>> yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>> On May 11, 6:33 pm, Free Lunch wrote:
>>>>>> On Sun, 11 May 2008 15:30:34 -0700 (PDT), beelzebub
>>>>>> yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On May 11, 3:07 pm, Free Lunch wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sun, 11 May 2008 13:54:34 -0700 (PDT), Jerry Kraus
>>>>>>>>> Splendid. YOU define Atheism, Mr. Atheist.
>>>>>>>> The lack of belief in gods.
>>>>>>> The belief that there is no god, actually.
>>>>>> No.
>>>>> So you believe in a god or gods?
>>>> No.
>>> Then as your answer indicates, you *believe* that there is no god.
>> No.
>
> You just contradicted yourself.
>
No, he didn't.
>
>>> That is not the *lack* of belief, it is a very specific, concrete
>>> belief.
>> No.
>
> It isn't debatable. It is a fact. Your beliefs are stated above.
> You aren't very clever, are you?
That's not a belief.
>
>>> Atheism is a belief.
>> No.
>
> Wow. You really are a *hell* of a debater.
>
> [Other irrelevant idiot, atheist-babble snipped. This one is just too
> stupid to continue. His stupidity makes my head hurt. Hilariously,
> painfully stupid.]
>
> Bottom line: Atheists hate to confront the fact that their beliefs
> are in fact a "belief." What else can they be? There is no
> alternative.
Except for lack of belief.
--
****************************************************
* DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226 *
--------------------------------------------------*
* "When I was a kid I used to pray every night for *
* a new bicycle. Then I realised that the Lord *
* doesn't work that way so I stole one and asked *
* Him to forgive me." --Emo Philips *
****************************************************