talk.religion.buddhism
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
talk.religion.buddhism only
 
Advanced search
February 2008
motuwethfrsasuw
    123 5
45678910 6
11121314151617 7
18192021222324 8
2526272829   9
2008
 Jan   Feb   Mar   Apr 
 May   Jun   Jul   Aug 
 Sep   Oct   Nov   Dec 
2008 2007 2006  
total
talk.religion.buddhism Profile…
RELATED GROUPS

POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
  the REAL meaning of ANATMAN, not the BS the miserable commentarialists spew between their demon-lips         


Author: ancientbuddhism
Date: Feb 29, 2008 19:17

The Buddhist term Anatman (Sanskrit), or Anatta (Pali) is an adjective
in sutra used to refer to the nature of phenomena as being devoid of
the Soul, that being the ontological and subjective Self (atman)
which is the "light (dipam), and only refuge" [DN 2.100]. Of the 662
occurrences of the term Anatta in the Nikayas, its usage is restricted
to referring to 22 nouns (forms, feelings, perception, experiences,
consciousness, the eye, eye-consciousness, desires, mentation, mental
formations, ear, nose, tongue, body, lusts, things unreal, etc.), all
phenomenal, as being Selfless (anatta). Contrary to countless many
popular (=profane, or = consensus, from which the truth can 'never be
gathered') books (as Buddhologist C.A.F. Davids has deemed them
'miserable little books') written outside the scope of Buddhist
doctrine, there is no "Doctrine of anatta/anatman" mentioned anywhere
in the sutras, rather anatta is used only to refer to impermanent
things/phenomena as other than the Soul, to be anatta, or Self-less
(an-atta).
Specifically in sutra, anatta is used to describe the temporal
and unreal (metaphysically so) nature of any and all composite,
consubstantial, phenomenal, and temporal things, from the macrocosmic,
to ...
Show full article (25.46Kb)
no comments
  Absolute space (was Re: sedona retreat tape)         


Author:
Date: Feb 29, 2008 03:38

RaaN wrote:
> It wasn't meant to be an exclusive disjunction.
> Anyway its not correct to say I am unborn.
> It is definitively correct to say nothing is unborn.
> No eternal awareness in blissful compassion.
> Accept the total lack of absolutes and see.

It is not possible to see the total lack of absolutes.
Absolutes are in thought, not in reality, and their
absence is also a fortiori in thought, not in reality.
In raw sensation there is neither the absolutes nor
their absence. That is the space of freedom, the
space cleared for freedom.

Tang Huyen
4 Comments