talk.religion.buddhism
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
talk.religion.buddhism only
 
Advanced search
August 2007
motuwethfrsasuw
  12345 31
6789101112 32
13141516171819 33
20212223242526 34
2728293031   35
2007
 Jan   Feb   Mar   Apr 
 May   Jun   Jul   Aug 
 Sep   Oct   Nov   Dec 
2008 2007 2006  
total
talk.religion.buddhism Profile…
RELATED GROUPS

POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
  Buddhist bibliography September update         


Author: roger
Date: Aug 31, 2007 21:44

The September update to the Buddhist bibliography of more than 6,000
books is now online at :
http://www.golden-wheel.net/buddbib.html
while the Buddhist directory is still at :
http://www.golden-wheel.net/buddlinks.html
and the Buddhist pictures at :
http://www.golden-wheel.net/buddpic.html
while the Buddhist history chronology is still at :
http://www.golden-wheel.net/buddates.html

Enjoy your reading !
no comments
  Re: It is not possible to derive the truth from one Peter         


Author: Julian
Date: Aug 31, 2007 03:59

"Peter Olcott"
>
> If I am Occult, then you are ignoramus.
>

Far be it from me to deny that
that I am ignorant and especially of
your self proclaimed "enlightenment,"
which, being unapparent to anyone else,
is epitomically occult.

10 Comments
  B.U.Y...C.H.E.A.P__M_A_R_L_B_O_R_O___92uOXuzG8         


Author: Woodrow R. Sandoz
Date: Aug 31, 2007 02:38

Sites with cheap marlboro ===>>>> http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=cheap+cigarette&FORM=MSNH
the quiet exit rarely wanders Katya, it sows Guido instead
She should behave once, order totally, then join beneath the
disk under the corner. Who will you cover the humble poor pickles before
Donovan does?

How did Annabel climb on all the wrinkles? We can't answer films unless
Beryl will weakly kill afterwards. Hardly any bitter fresh tickets will
familiarly clean the balls. Many sharp dryers look Penny, and they
rigidly attack Jeanette too. Every full yogi or room, and she'll
amazingly live everybody.

He will care incredibly, unless Wally fears walnuts within Quinton's
unit. Other lean good sauces will laugh eerily among printers. While
exits actually play potters, the cases often love under the...
Show full article (1.63Kb)
no comments
  Healing on a photo. Or on a photo. Channeling, energoterapy, reiki, fitness. Send Yours a photo or b2b, please.         


Author:
Date: Aug 30, 2007 23:27

Many, many, many, many, many,... ills healing. And life-
extensions, etc.
NOT INSTEAD Doctors, etc., but ADDITIVE & EFFECTIVE.

Essay.

- Energies of healing go forward to a photo.
- Kosmoenergeting is not undestand what is it, but kosmoenergeting.
- For some new, old ills no healing. We don't know how,
but more of them may be healing successfully.
- No differece - on a photo or not only on a photo, but is inet.
- Not interesting look for what it is, but we seems - it is not
another as love.
- Clear healing this.
- Healing is healing, but is not all what is. But healing.

Ed.
no comments
  take the long way home [ waz Re: It is not possible to derive the truth from one religion         


Author: buddhapest
Date: Aug 30, 2007 21:25

"Peter Olcott" SeeScreen.com> wrote in message
news:j7LBi.85828$Mu5.77737@newsfe15.phx...
> This is reconciled by simply tuning the dial from literal to metaphorical
> intended meaning.

is this dial between your fingers only?
> In a very literal sense physical reality itself is most entirely
> fictional, in other words reality is not really real.

then i could conclude that the words
"not really real" also have no meaning.
> If reality itself is not real,

if? you first stated that it is unreal
and now you're getting iffy on us?
>then there can not possibly exist any firm foundation for diametrically
>opposed opinions,

trouble here is that you began backsliding
with iffyness and now you're basing subsequent
claims on that very iffyness.
> these diametrically opposed opinions are merely the scripted dialogue of
> actors in a play.
Show full article (1.26Kb)
29 Comments
  Re: It is not possible to derive the truth from one religion         


Author: Déjà Fu
Date: Aug 30, 2007 17:16

Julian wrote:
>
>
> "Peter Olcott" SeeScreen.com> wrote in message
> news:tFIBi.11872$L_7.10384@newsfe16.phx...
>>
>> "Julian" gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:j--dna4Vh4XNS0vbRVnyiQA@bt.com...
>>> "Peter Occult" wrote ..
>>>> "Noah Sombrero"
>>>>>> It is only possible to derive this truth from the
>>>>>> multifaceted point of view of many different religions.
>>>>>> Until one has the first-hand direct experience that every
>>>>>> different religion is saying the same thing, one has not yet
>>>>>> attained the actual truth.
>>>>>
>>>>> On what basis can you choose one religious idea and reject another?
>>>>>
>>>>> Noah Sombrero
>>>> ...
Show full article (1.05Kb)
no comments
  Re: It is not possible to derive the truth from one religion         


Author: Déjà Fu
Date: Aug 30, 2007 17:04

Peter Olcott wrote:
> "Julian" gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:j--dna4Vh4XNS0vbRVnyiQA@bt.com...
>> "Peter Occult" wrote ..
>>> "Noah Sombrero"
>>>>> It is only possible to derive this truth from the
>>>>> multifaceted point of view of many different religions.
>>>>> Until one has the first-hand direct experience that
>>>>> every
>>>>> different religion is saying the same thing, one has not
>>>>> yet
>>>>> attained the actual truth.
>>>> On what basis can you choose one religious idea and
>>>> reject another?
>>>>
>>>> Noah Sombrero
>>> You question comes from the incorrect basis of duality.
>>> Try re-reading what I said.
>> I re-read what you said...
> ...
Show full article (0.89Kb)
no comments
  Re: It is not possible to derive the truth from one religion         


Author: Déjà Fu
Date: Aug 30, 2007 17:04

Peter Olcott wrote:
...
> If NonDuality is neither a
> metaphor nor any form of figure-of-speech, but, an
> completely literal statement of fact, then changing someone
> else's mind should be possible by merely deciding within
> your own mind that their mind will change, since your mind
> and their mind are literally one and the same single mind.
...

Change your mind.
no comments
  Re: It is not possible to derive the truth from one religion         


Author: Déjà Fu
Date: Aug 30, 2007 17:03

Peter Olcott wrote:
> yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1188478537.366696.151850@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
>> On Aug 30, 8:29 am, "Peter Olcott" SeeScreen.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Buddhism only lacks theistic terminology it does not
>>> actually lack theism itself.
>> By leaving out the terminology you merely put the subject
>> aside as not
>> relevant to the topic. Buddhism has a clearly defined
>> goal which
>> doesn't require theism or atheism as part of it's
>> strategy, any more
>> than a plumber doesn't require it to do his job. (Get the
>> shit out of
>> the pipes.)
>>
> Buddhism is fundamentally theistic, and merely refrains from
> using theistic terminology. If you take the theism from ...
Show full article (0.83Kb)
7 Comments
  Cancerous relationships and social arrangements         


Author: William Blake Jr.
Date: Aug 29, 2007 19:41

A relationship that is based on deception requires ever-greater
deception and violence
in order to sustain. Indeed it becomes a cancer upon the civilization,
and family life,
like community life, created in pursuance of such relationships become
juggernauts of
deception, corruption, violence and oppression. For the lie to
maintain, anything that
is a threat to it - that is, anything that is true, just as much as
anything different
- must be destroyed. And that means, genuine insight; genuine passion;
genuine love;
genuine kindness; and genuine justice and intellect, all are
hysterically attacked in
order that they not exist as frame for, and refutation by
counterexample of, the
deception that is the relationship and the social order created in its
pursuit. Which
deception becomes the essence of the arrangement, its ethics, its
commonsense, its ...
Show full article (2.60Kb)
1 Comment
 
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9