talk.religion.buddhism
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
talk.religion.buddhism only
 
Advanced search
June 2007
motuwethfrsasuw
    123 22
45678910 23
11121314151617 24
18192021222324 25
252627282930  26
2007
 Jan   Feb   Mar   Apr 
 May   Jun   Jul   Aug 
 Sep   Oct   Nov   Dec 
2008 2007 2006  
total
talk.religion.buddhism Profile…
RELATED GROUPS

POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
  Re: Click Stu (was Re: Where is it justified)         


Author: Keynes
Date: Jun 24, 2007 23:28

On Mon, 25 Jun 2007 01:29:04 +0100, brian mitchell fishing.net>
wrote:
>Lee Rudolph wrote:
>
>> Okay. I write, and have little or no information about the relationships
>> my reader (say, you) has to any particular word or phrase I write (except
>> now I know a bit more than nothing about you and "shit"). You read what
>> I write, and have little or no information about the relationships I have
>> to my words. I see little or no possibility of my being able, with any
>> confidence, to "transfer" anything from me to you that depends on our two
>> stores of private relationships. Your reactions are yours.
>
>I wonder how you manage with so little confidence in readerships.
>Messages in bottles...
>

Words have denotations (which appear in dictionaries),
and emotional connotations (built by personal experience).
To say "the Bears won the superbowl" may be a fact,
yet the effects of the statement on listeners will vary.
Show full article (1.65Kb)
no comments
  Re: Nothing to bother about (was Re: Highly sought after)         


Author: Keynes
Date: Jun 24, 2007 23:08

On Sun, 24 Jun 2007 19:04:49 +0100, "Julian" gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>"Awaken21" gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:1182704545.916186.7460@c77g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
>> On Jun 23, 7:16 pm, Tang Huyen gmail.com[remove]>
>> wrote:
...
Show full article (4.86Kb)
no comments
  Re: Nothing to bother about (was Re: Highly sought after)         


Author: Bruce Pole
Date: Jun 24, 2007 22:55

Robert Epstein:
> What you are talking about is even more obvious in art. Most audiences
> will be left unmoved by a perfectly executed Sonata that has no nuances,
> feelings, or "active aesthetic creation" at play in the performance. I
> have heard this kind of piano playing and no matter how facile the
> pianist is, it leaves one restless, bored and unsatisfied.

Some spiders simply weave webs that are perfectly executed no doubt, but
without nuances, feelings, or "active aesthetic creation" at play in the
performance. Their weaving leaves one restless, bored and unsatisfied.

"Restless, bored and unsatisfied". Have you tried practising Buddhism?

Bruce

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
no comments
  Re: Nothing to bother about (was Re: Highly sought after)         


Author: Robert Epstein
Date: Jun 24, 2007 21:25

Tang Huyen wrote:
>
> Robert Epstein wrote:
>
>
>>What you are talking about is even more obvious in art. Most audiences
>>will be left unmoved by a perfectly executed Sonata that has no nuances,
>>feelings, or "active aesthetic creation" at play in the performance. I
>>have heard this kind of piano playing and no matter how facile the
>>pianist is, it leaves one restless, bored and unsatisfied.
>
>
> It is called a polished, accomplished runthrough/walkthrough,
> lacking expression. Solti's Beethoven with CSO sounds like
> that. A glorified Paris Hilton rendition.
>
> Tang Huyen
>
>
Show full article (0.95Kb)
no comments
  Re: Nothing to bother about (was Re: Highly sought after)         


Author: possum
Date: Jun 24, 2007 19:33

"Tang Huyen" gmail.com[remove]> wrote in message
news:137u8irbu00nc26@news.supernews.com...
>
>
> Robert Epstein wrote:
>
>> What you are talking about is even more obvious in art. Most audiences
>> will be left unmoved by a perfectly executed Sonata that has no
>> nuances,
>> feelings, or "active aesthetic creation" at play in the performance. I
>> have heard this kind of piano playing and no matter how facile the
>> pianist is, it leaves one restless, bored and unsatisfied.
>
> It is called a polished, accomplished runthrough/walkthrough,
> lacking expression. Solti's Beethoven with CSO sounds like
> that. A glorified Paris Hilton rendition.
Show full article (0.87Kb)
no comments
  Re: Nothing to bother about (was Re: Highly sought after)         


Author:
Date: Jun 24, 2007 19:03

Robert Epstein wrote:
> What you are talking about is even more obvious in art. Most audiences
> will be left unmoved by a perfectly executed Sonata that has no nuances,
> feelings, or "active aesthetic creation" at play in the performance. I
> have heard this kind of piano playing and no matter how facile the
> pianist is, it leaves one restless, bored and unsatisfied.

It is called a polished, accomplished runthrough/walkthrough,
lacking expression. Solti's Beethoven with CSO sounds like
that. A glorified Paris Hilton rendition.

Tang Huyen
no comments
  Re: Nothing to bother about (was Re: Highly sought after)         


Author: Robert Epstein
Date: Jun 24, 2007 18:53

Lee Rudolph wrote:
> Tang Huyen gmail.com[remove]> writes:
>
>
>>Robert Epstein wrote:
>
> ...
>
>>>To what extent do you believe from your travels that "living teachers"
>>>are still around who can...
Show full article (1.92Kb)
no comments
  Re: Nothing to bother about (was Re: Highly sought after)         


Author: Robert Epstein
Date: Jun 24, 2007 18:51

Tang Huyen wrote:
>
> Robert Epstein wrote:
>
>
>>Tang Huyen:
>>
>>
>>>Hehe. However it is tragic for people to go coo-coo,
>>>even after (especially after) so many years and
>>>decades devoted to mental culture. These...
Show full article (4.45Kb)
no comments
  Re: Click Stu (was Re: Where is it justified)         


Author:
Date: Jun 24, 2007 18:46

brian mitchell wrote:
> Lee Rudolph:
>
>> Okay. I write, and have little or no information about the relationships
>> my reader (say, you) has to any particular word or phrase I write (except
>> now I know a bit more than...
Show full article (2.01Kb)
no comments
  Re: Click Stu (was Re: Where is it justified)         


Author: Robert Epstein
Date: Jun 24, 2007 18:45

Tang Huyen wrote:
>
> Lee Rudolph wrote:
>
>
>>Except in a fairly ideal sense, the words a writer writes are not
>>the same words that the reader (thereafter) reads. So it *is* (or
>>should be) surprising that A's words...
Show full article (3.12Kb)
no comments
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9