talk.religion.buddhism
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
talk.religion.buddhism only
 
Advanced search
December 2007
motuwethfrsasuw
     12 48
3456789 49
10111213141516 50
17181920212223 51
24252627282930 52
31       1
2007
 Jan   Feb   Mar   Apr 
 May   Jun   Jul   Aug 
 Sep   Oct   Nov   Dec 
2008 2007 2006  
total
talk.religion.buddhism Profile…
RELATED GROUPS

POPULAR GROUPS

more...
 Up
  Re: meaing of TATHAGATA is "Become-Brahman" (tat tvam asi) agata (gone unto) Tat (That, Brahman) =Tathagata         


Author: Rahula
Date: Dec 15, 2007 09:17

Hi,
> BY THAT ILLOGICAL BS, since Gotama said he taught "BRAHMAYANA" (SN
> 5.5) he was teaching "The path to the Best"....LOL
>
> its "path to Brahman", son.

Yes, do you which path is the best? The path to Nibbana, Arahathood is
the best, and precisely that is what the Buddha taught.

Secondly, I was only quoting the Atthakatha, which you have always
been quoting.

I am not interested in your opinion.

Regards,
Rahula
no comments
  Re: refuting Rahula and ALL of theravada yet again with doctrine. "subjugation of the khandhas"         


Author: Rahula
Date: Dec 15, 2007 09:14

Hi,
> rahula and his snake-theravada CLAIM , contrary to sutta, that there
> are pure aggregates, or as they deem "non-grasping khandhas" (however
> the Pali says actually 'khandhas which are not grasped after')

Can you explain to me the differences between 'non-grasping khandhas'
and 'khandhas which are not grasped after'?
> However Buddhism teaches the NIRODHA, the cessation, the subjugation
of the khandhas. <

I would say, the cessation, the subjugation of the clinging of the
khandhas, or craving. This is not merely my opinion. This is the third
noble thruth.
> MN 1.299 The corporeal, the corporeal I hear said. What does this
> mean? Friend Visakha, the corporeal is a designation for the five
> aggregates befallen through clinging.

'Self-identification, self-identification,' it is said, lady. Which
self-identification is described by the Blessed One?"
Show full article (4.29Kb)
no comments
  Re: No frills (was Re: The law of action)         


Author: dt
Date: Dec 15, 2007 08:49

Tang Huyen wrote:
>
> dt wrote:
>
>
>>Well, there were also several years where *I* was
>>checked out. That ought to balance the accounts
>>somewhat.
>
>
> Erm, you were checked out for some years?
> Are you saying that rebirth is for real?
>
> Tang Huyen

Hell, *I* dunno. I was checked out on beer and pot.

DT
37 Comments
  Rahula falls off the cliff headfirst. Rahula says "citta is not a khandha", and "citta is a process"         


Author: ancientbuddhism
Date: Dec 15, 2007 02:07

Read my previos post about the Mind, please. If you have to respond,
respond to those post. Briefly, the mind in not a khandha. It;s a
process.
Regards,
Rahula
*************
Talk about inconsistency hell....... !
Citta is a "process" now,....... and also "not a khandha".........LOL!!
Buddhahood = 'process'?? LOL
Liberation (cittavimutta) = 'process'?? LOL
Nibbana = 'process'?? LOL
Nibbana = pure citta, and Nibbana is the cessation of any processes
(bhava) i.e. "bhavanirodha nibbanam" (Nirvana means the cessation of
processes/becoming).........

Can I quote you on what you said boy?????

Rahula "citta is not a khandha"...........ok Rahula, .........thanks for that
inconsistency of yours.

Course, ive told you a 1000 times the Citta is "freed of the
khandhas", the "citta is NONE of the 5khandhas".
no comments