No vilification by Momen - Glaysher is another matter
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
talk.religion.bahai only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

talk.religion.bahai Profile…
 Up
No vilification by Momen - Glaysher is another matter         


Author: Viv
Date: Jan 31, 2008 05:08

A review of the website material shows no "slanderous vilification" by
Momen - Fred Glaysher, however, is shown to be a regular and
enthusiastic practitioner.

Viv.
11 Comments
Bahaim Tactics & Technique         


Author: 383
Date: Jan 31, 2008 20:49

BAHAIM Tactics & Techniques

1. As far as possible they hold back from responding
2. Then they claim no knowledge [of the given issue] by feigning
ignorance
3. After the exposer has exposed they will try to divert to secondary
and totally peripheral and irrelevent side-issues
4. The exposer is then painted as someone with an axe to grind,
biased, deluded (while they, the bahaim, still have not responded to
the main issue exposed)
5. Next they relate mental instability and insanity to the exposer
[i.e. shoot the messenger]
6. Then, the last tactic, is to wheel out several dubious personas on
the scene who claim to be neutral non-bahai observers who then begin
attacking the exposer as well as the issue exposed and supporting the
bahais and their issues as so-called non-bahais

The BAHAIM Technique

Caution - THE BAHAI TECHNIQUE
Show full article (1.15Kb)
no comments
Re: Bahaim Tactics & Technique         


Author: Viv
Date: Feb 1, 2008 02:36

On 1 Feb, 04:49, 383 gmail.com> wrote:
> BAHAIM Tactics & Techniques

Oh look, Nima's changing the header and starting his usual spam - he
seems to have realised that Fred is coming out of this thread very
badly, and wants to shut it down.

V.
no comments
Re: Bahaim Tactics & Technique         


Author: Hasley9
Date: Feb 1, 2008 08:36

On Feb 1, 4:36 am, Viv hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
> On 1 Feb, 04:49, 383 gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> BAHAIM Tactics & Techniques
>
> Oh look, Nima's changing the header and starting his usual spam - he
> seems to have realised that Fred is coming out of this thread very
> badly, and wants to shut it down.
>
> V.

Nima is both a self-hating Jew and a self-hating Bahai-zadeh. That's
why he has to associate all these Hebrew endings to Baha'i words.
no comments
Re: Bahaim Tactics & Technique         


Author: diamondsouled
Date: Feb 1, 2008 09:05

Howdy all,

Denis MacEoin is writing a paper in answer to Moojan's fundamentalist
slandering and stereotyping of former and present corelgionists as
Baha'i apostates. It will be interesting as well as informative to see
Denis quite easily deconstruct and debunk Moojan's poor excuse for a
scholarly paper.

Yours

Larry Rowe
no comments
Re: Bahaim Tactics & Technique         


Author: jimhabegger
Date: Feb 1, 2008 09:21

On Feb 1, 12:05 pm, diamondsouled northwestel.net> wrote:
> Howdy all,
>
> Denis MacEoin is writing a paper in answer to Moojan's fundamentalist
> slandering and stereotyping of former and present corelgionists as
> Baha'i apostates. It will be interesting as well as informative to see
> Denis quite easily deconstruct and debunk Moojan's poor excuse for a
> scholarly paper.
>
> Yours
>
> Larry Rowe

Hi Larry,

I'm writing a response to it too, in the form of my own glimpses of
the dialogue/Talisman chronicles, and experiences with the Talisman
liberal fellowship.

Jim
no comments
Re: Bahaim Tactics & Technique         


Author: Shahriar
Date: Feb 1, 2008 11:31

gmail.com> wrote in message
news:3678dd07-d209-4c45-b7ee-bcdcf82a0524@c4g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
> On Feb 1, 12:05 pm, diamondsouled northwestel.net> wrote:
>> Howdy all,
>>
>> Denis MacEoin is writing a paper in answer to Moojan's fundamentalist
>> slandering and stereotyping of former and present corelgionists as
>> Baha'i apostates. It will be interesting as well as informative to see
>> Denis quite easily deconstruct and debunk Moojan's poor excuse for a
>> scholarly paper.
>>
>> Yours
>>
>> Larry Rowe
>
> Hi Larry,
>
> I'm writing a response to it too, in the form of my own glimpses of
> the dialogue/Talisman chronicles, and experiences with the Talisman
> liberal fellowship. ...
Show full article (1.20Kb)
no comments
Re: Bahaim Tactics & Technique         


Author: jimhabegger
Date: Feb 1, 2008 12:29

On Feb 1, 2:31 pm, "Shahriar" wrote:
> gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:3678dd07-d209-4c45-b7ee-bcdcf82a0524@c4g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
>> On Feb 1, 12:05 pm, diamondsouled northwestel.net> wrote:
>>> Howdy all,
>
>>> Denis MacEoin is writing a paper in answer to Moojan's fundamentalist
>>> slandering and stereotyping of former and present corelgionists as
>>> Baha'i apostates. It will be interesting as well as informative to see
>>> Denis quite easily deconstruct and debunk Moojan's poor excuse for a
>>> scholarly paper.
>
>>> Yours
>
>>> Larry Rowe
> ...
Show full article (1.66Kb)
no comments
Re: vilification by Momen         


Author: Shariyar
Date: Feb 1, 2008 13:21

>> Hopefully you would have a credible data set figured. I am not sure how a
>> scholarly penmanship may be recognized and pass trough the scrutiny of
>> Talisman, if there is any. but opinions, I understand, maybe allowed,
>> though may not be considered scholarly or credible. The good thing about
>> academic journals is that the submitted articles are measured against
>> credible data, structure of logic, and contribution to the field. I am
>> looking forward to read your article.
>
> It will be a frankly personal and subjective account, with no pretense
> at being scholarly. There will be an appendix describing my own views,
> with no pretense of substantiation, another one with links to
> information about some of the people involved, and another one with a
> time line of the chronicles...
Show full article (0.94Kb)
no comments
Re: vilification by Momen         


Author: jimhabegger
Date: Feb 1, 2008 15:48

On Feb 1, 4:21 pm, "Shariyar" noserver.com> wrote:
>>> Hopefully you would have a credible data set figured. I am not sure how a
>>> scholarly penmanship may be recognized and pass trough the scrutiny of
>>> Talisman, if there is any. but opinions, I understand, maybe allowed,
>>> though may not be considered scholarly or credible. The good thing about
>>> academic journals is that the submitted articles are measured against
>>> credible data, structure of logic, and contribution to the field. I am
>>> looking forward to read your article.
>
>> It will be a frankly personal and subjective account, with no pretense
>> at being scholarly. There will be an appendix describing my own views,
>> with no pretense of substantiation, another one with links to
>> information about some of the people involved, and another one with a
>> time line of the chronicles and links to relevant information and
>> documents.
>
>> Jim
>
> Sounds to me like another web site! would it be a pro or sans-Bahai web
> page? ...
Show full article (1.77Kb)
no comments

RELATED THREADS
SubjectArticles qty Group
Re: My Response to Moojan Momen's Slanderous Vilificationnews.admin.netabuse.usenet ·
Re: A Response to Moojan Momen's Takfir & Slanderous Vilification24 talk.religion.bahai ·
 
1 2