The Story of Nima and William:

While looking for Nima stating categorically that he never paid William
Pleasant a dime to get his book vanity published, I found the following
-
just an example of a desparate fellow making a bunch of secondary
hypothosis
to save his increasing ridiculous conspiracy theories.

To begin with, Nima announces the imminent "publication" of his book,
which, back in 2004, was going to destroy the Baha'is soon, veeeery
soooon. William expresses his great admiration for our favourite
Plastic Guru, and the feeling is totally mutual.

http://groups.google.com/group/talk.religion.bahai/msg/1a0d4f0ed01a6132?hl=en&

"I testify that there is no god but God and that William Pleasant is
the Singularity of God (Vahid'ullah)!

Thank you brother Vahid'ullah for your words of Truth in every moment,
before every and after every moment (fi kullu hin, qabla hin wa ba'da
hin). " (and so on in the same vein for several paragraphs)

Wahid (Sat 3 July, 2004)

I found this one was quite amusing, too, considering the date.

Like the Baha'i Faith itself, which Nima has been proclaiming will be
dead "soon, very soon", apparently, I too have already been totally
destroyed by the mighty Plastic Guru.

Even back in 2004, when I was telling him that I felt quite alright,
and
that reports of my death had been esaggerated - apparently, I've been
a ghost since back then when I was still working at the Tap:

http://groups.google.com/group/talk.religion.bahai/msg/a4492331335483be?hl=en&

pahamm...@onetel.net.uk (Paul Hammond) wrote in message

And, as proclaimed, it is happening right in front of our eyes, and in
public too!

Tis the season to be jolly!

---

Yup - it's certainly very jolly to be able to confirm, Nima, that once
more,
I am alive and well and annoying the hell out of YOU!

Baha'i Spy Ring Busted! wrote:

I couldn't find that one - but the rest of the farce was still
incredibly
amusing!!!

Unlike you, I don't assert without proof, and I don't pretend I've
already provided proof when I haven't.

Paul

PaulHammond wanked:

Or, rather, selective posts opportunistically cobbled together, i.e.
the baha'i technique, which is no proof at all. You forgot to put in
the posts you selectively quoted in there were I specified I paid him
_specificaly_ per the contract for printing costs. Now you assert that
I had never paid him at all, implying that William Pleasant has
actually told you this. I have asked you to bring the statement from
him where he overtly says this and you come back with typical baha'i
technique BS. Ball in your court, cultist!

W

PaulHammond wrote:

Like this, for example:

http://groups.google.com.au/group/talk.religion.bahai/browse_frm/thread/e3594a59...&

"LIAR! I have never had a bad word to say about Larry...."

When you have said,
http://groups.google.com.au/group/talk.religion.bahai/browse_frm/thread/1887081b...#6ffa0b62942bbbb2

Yup.

Teaming up with a lunatic like Nima is *precisely* the way to
convince someone that a person has a direct link to the man upstairs,
right?

A no-mark loser with delusions of grandeur that can't make his
mind up whether he's the voice of God or a hopeless joker!

Paul

Let me help you out:

http://groups.google.com/group/talk.religion.bahai/msg/48e31ca4c7c23410?hl=en&

And when you, Prof. Maneck, step before the mainly Black students you
are charged with educating at JSU--some of them may wish to be
writers, by the way--inform them that contrary to what you had been
taught and what you had believed, writers do not pay publishers to
produce their books. Quite the opposite: publishers pay writers for
the right to produce and market their books. This usually takes the
form of what is called an ADVANCE.

So, Prof. Maneck, you are correct. Nima Hazini paid me "zip" to
publish his book. I paid Nima Hazini for the privilege to produce and
market his first book. It was a privilege.

--wm pleasant

Hasley9@aol.com wrote:

And let me help you out on the admission by you that I was indeed
defrauded by Bill Pleasant, and that this is widely known by your ilk:

http://groups.google.com.au/group/talk.religion.bahai/browse_thread/t...

Newsgroups: talk.religion.bahai
From: sman...@jam.rr.com - Find messages by this author
Date: 25 Oct 2005 16:40:23 -0700
Local: Wed, Oct 26 2005 9:40 am
Subject: Re: YooHoo palu!

You should have been Bill Pleasant. After all, if you are going to make

a sucker out of Nima Hazini you might as well make money at it.

http://groups.google.com.au/group/talk.religion.bahai/browse_frm/thread/1491f8f1...#43af3c9641255381

AyahuascaGnostic wrote:

AyahuascaGnostic wrote:

No, I don't.

I assert that, while we were teasing you about having to pay
William to get you work published *you* were the one
saying that in fact you hadn't paid him a dime.

Here's the post from Bill Pleasant where he was backing you
up on this one while you two were still "buddy, buddy", and
apparently I was "mad as hell"