|
|
Up |
|
|
  |
Author: áÇ Çáå ÇáÇ Çááå ÍÞÇð ÍÞÇðáÇ Çáå ÇáÇ Çááå ÍÞÇð ÍÞÇð Date: May 12, 2008 19:23
On May 1, 10:55 am, "Asparagus" spimspam.com> wrote:
> Not in the least ... it has to do with respect for the beliefs of others and
> their freedom to believe as they do irrespective of how idiotic their
> beliefs are ... which explains why you are permitted to hang loose around
> here (and elsewhere) and attempt to convince a gullible readership that your
> views are not idiotic.
Pot, kettle, black! Well, well, well. One of the biggest sectarian
biggest around these parts obviously knows which the way the wind has
begun blowing and has changed his tune. And this is the same gobshite
who uttered the following,
1) When lying about his identity:
http://groups.google.com/group/talk.religion.bahai/browse_thread/
thread/bd7e852c70316c9/d146728618637ab4?
lnk=st&q=Guardian&rnum=3#d146728618637ab4
"The Beloved Guardian assured us that those diseased people who
attacked the Cause of God would deservedly suffer and be destroyed
and behold, this vicious one was struck down exactly as you will be
destroyed for your wanton and outrageous lies and calumnies."
When advocating a nuclear preemptive strike against Iran:
|
| Show full article (1.71Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
  |
Author: áÇ Çáå ÇáÇ Çááå ÍÞÇð ÍÞÇðáÇ Çáå ÇáÇ Çááå ÍÞÇð ÍÞÇð Date: May 12, 2008 19:25
On May 1, 10:55 am, "Asparagus" spimspam.com> wrote:
> Not in the least ... it has to do with respect for the beliefs of others and
> their freedom to believe as they do irrespective of how idiotic their
> beliefs are ... which explains why you are permitted to hang loose around
> here (and elsewhere) and attempt to convince a gullible readership that your
> views are not idiotic.
Pot, kettle, black! Well, well, well. One of the biggest sectarian
biggots around these parts obviously knows which the way the wind has
begun blowing and has changed his tune. And this is the same gobshite
who uttered the following,
1) When lying about his identity:
http://groups.google.com/group/talk.religion.bahai/browse_thread/
thread/bd7e852c70316c9/d146728618637ab4?
lnk=st&q=Guardian&rnum=3#d146728618637ab4
"The Beloved Guardian assured us that those diseased people who
attacked the Cause of God would deservedly suffer and be destroyed
and behold, this vicious one was struck down exactly as you will be
destroyed for your wanton and outrageous lies and calumnies."
When advocating a nuclear preemptive strike against Iran:
|
| Show full article (1.71Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
  |
Author: AsparagusAsparagus Date: May 13, 2008 04:30
> I am also still waiting for those criminal charges you were
> threatening to bring against me here, Mr terrorist,
It's usually the Police who initiate criminal proceedings. If you break the
criminal law then they come down upon you like a ton of bricks!
given that I have
> a taped confession from you circa 2000 unequivocally suggesting that
> you had sympathized with the Irish Republican Army.
I remember that conversation! You are quite right! I did sympathise,
empathise with and express admiration for the IRA!
Of course, that was the IRA and/or the IRB, not the PIRA or CIRA or RIRA and
that was the IRA under Collins, Brugha, Griffith, Mulcahy, Barry, Breen et
al that, though few in numbers, fought the British Empire to a standstill
and led to the establishment of Saorstat Eireann in 1922. That's a far cry
from more recent events ... which you may realise ... though I doubt it.
If you recall I did note that this was the first of the wars of liberation
in which an oppressed population could and did politically defeat a major
power by military means. Others have copied .... though not quite as well!
|
| Show full article (2.04Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: áÇ Çáå ÇáÇ Çááå ÍÞÇð ÍÞÇðáÇ Çáå ÇáÇ Çááå ÍÞÇð ÍÞÇð Date: May 13, 2008 16:04
On May 13, 9:30 pm, "Asparagus" spimspam.com> wrote:
>> I am also still waiting for those criminal charges you were
>> threatening to bring against me here, Mr terrorist,
>
> It's usually the Police who initiate criminal proceedings. If you break the
> criminal law then they come down upon you like a ton of bricks!
You're backtracking - as usual. You are on tape confessing to being a
sympathizer of the Irish Republican Army. I have the tape to prove it.
You threatened to go to the police here - as if there is a cause. I
have called your bluff and given you more cause to consult your
failing heart medication. I challenged you to throw your best shot,
and you have come up short...as always.
And more reminder - as if any more was needed - about your shifty,
opportunistic and two-faced duplicity:
1) When lying about his identity:
|
| Show full article (2.04Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: AsparagusAsparagus Date: May 13, 2008 17:53
> On May 13, 9:30 pm, "Asparagus" spimspam.com> wrote:
>>> I am also still waiting for those criminal charges you were
>>> threatening to bring against me here, Mr terrorist,
>>
>> It's usually the Police who initiate criminal proceedings. If you break
>> the
>> criminal law then they come down upon you like a ton of bricks!
>
> You're backtracking - as usual. You are on tape confessing to being a
> sympathizer of the Irish Republican Army. I have the tape to prove it.
> You threatened to go...
|
| Show full article (2.78Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: áÇ Çáå ÇáÇ Çááå ÍÞÇð ÍÞÇðáÇ Çáå ÇáÇ Çááå ÍÞÇð ÍÞÇð Date: May 14, 2008 02:07
On May 14, 10:53 am, "Asparagus" spimspam.com> wrote:
>> On May 13, 9:30 pm, "Asparagus" spimspam.com> wrote:
>
>>>> I am also still waiting for those criminal charges you were
>>>> threatening to bring against me here, Mr terrorist,
>
>>> It's usually the Police who initiate criminal proceedings. If you break
>>> the
>>> criminal law then they come down upon you like a ton of bricks!
>
>> You're backtracking - as usual. You are on tape confessing to being a
>> sympathizer of the Irish Republican Army. I have the tape to prove it.
>> You threatened to go to the police here - as if there is a cause.
>
> If you publish a sound recording of a telephone conversation without the
> permission of the other party or parties to the conversation, you commit a ...
|
| Show full article (1.44Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: AsparagusAsparagus Date: May 14, 2008 04:03
>> If you publish a sound recording of a telephone conversation without the
>> permission of the other party or parties to the conversation, you commit
>> a
>> criminal offence in Queensland. I cannot report a crime that has not
>> happened. You go ahead and commit the crime and I'll report it.
>
> Sounds like backtracking and cold feet to me. And do not deign to
> pontificate on QLD law, which you know nothing about. Go and battle
> your usual welfare phantoms in Northern Ireland instead. That is all
> you are worthy of...
>
> W
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: AsparagusAsparagus Date: May 14, 2008 04:05
"Asparagus" spimspam.com> wrote in message
news:ufqdnV7y871sW7fVnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@bt.com...
>>> If you publish a sound recording of a telephone conversation without the
>>> permission of the other party or parties to the conversation, you commit
>>> a
>>> criminal offence in Queensland. I cannot report a crime that has not
>>> happened. You go ahead and commit the crime and I'll report it.
>>
>> Sounds like backtracking and cold feet to me. And do not deign to
>> pontificate on QLD law, which you know nothing about. Go and battle
>> your usual welfare phantoms in Northern Ireland instead. That is all
>> you are worthy of...
>>
>> W
>
> So I must assume therefore that this link is an inaccurate representation
> of the law in Queensland: - ...
|
| Show full article (2.54Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: áÇ Çáå ÇáÇ Çááå ÍÞÇð ÍÞÇðáÇ Çáå ÇáÇ Çááå ÍÞÇð ÍÞÇð Date: May 16, 2008 00:25
On May 14, 9:03 pm, "Asparagus" spimspam.com> wrote:
>So I must assume therefore that this link is an inaccurate representation of
>the law in Queensland: -
In this case, absolutely!
W
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: áÇ Çáå ÇáÇ Çááå ÍÞÇð ÍÞÇðáÇ Çáå ÇáÇ Çááå ÍÞÇð ÍÞÇð Date: May 16, 2008 00:28
On May 14, 9:05 pm, "Asparagus" spimspam.com> wrote:
> "Asparagus" spimspam.com> wrote in message
>
> news:ufqdnV7y871sW7fVnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@bt.com...
>
>
>
>
>
>>>> If you publish a sound recording of a telephone conversation without the
>>>> permission of the other party or parties to the conversation, you commit
>>>> a
>>>> criminal offence in Queensland. I cannot report a crime that has not
>>>> happened. You go ahead and commit the crime and I'll report it.
>
>>> Sounds like backtracking and cold feet to me. And do not deign to
>>> pontificate on QLD law, which you know nothing about. Go and battle
>>> your usual welfare phantoms in Northern Ireland instead. That is all ...
|
| Show full article (1.59Kb) |
| no comments |
|
RELATED THREADS |
  |
|
|
|
|
|