talk.religion.bahai
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
talk.religion.bahai only
 
Advanced search
July 2008
motuwethfrsasuw
 123456 27
78910111213 28
14151617181920 29
21222324252627 30
28293031    31
2008
 Jan   Feb   Mar   Apr 
 May   Jun   Jul   Aug 
 Sep   Oct   Nov   Dec 
2008 2007 2006  
total
talk.religion.bahai Profile…
RELATED GROUPS

POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
  Why I Resigned from the Mormon Church, then became a Baha'i, then resigned from the Baha'i Faith and became a DAHESHIST: a follower of Dr. Dahesh, the miracle-working Prophet of Lebanon......         


Author: Darrick
Date: Jul 23, 2008 10:40

no comments
  free sms and mms converter just go to web site         


Author: bala
Date: Jul 23, 2008 07:45

no comments
  Boycott Wikipedia!!!! Now already!!         


Author: All Bad
Date: Jul 22, 2008 18:44

Check out this URL and avoid it!!!!!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page

Oh, look, it is the evol Wikipedia!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page

- All Bad
1 Comment
  For your info         


Author: Pacifist
Date: Jul 22, 2008 08:05

1 Comment
  A History Department Bans Citing Wikipedia as a Research Source         


Author: 303
Date: Jul 22, 2008 02:24

Anti-Wikipedia "screed monkeys" (Paul Hammond, 2008) in the Ivory
Tower too. Seems the anti-cabal, anti-corporatist anti-wikipedians are
everywhere:

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/21/education/21wikipedia.html?_r=3&oref=s

A History Department Bans Citing Wikipedia as a Research Source

Article Tools Sponsored By
By NOAM COHEN
Published: February 21, 2007

When half a dozen students in Neil Waters’s Japanese history class at
Middlebury College asserted on exams that the Jesuits supported the
Shimabara Rebellion in 17th-century Japan, he knew something was
wrong. The Jesuits were in “no position to aid a revolution,” he said;
the few of them in Japan were in hiding.

He figured out the problem soon enough. The obscure, though incorrect,
information was from Wikipedia, the collaborative online encyclopedia,
and the students had picked it up cramming for his exam.
Show full article (6.05Kb)
1 Comment
  A History Department Bans Citing Wikipedia as a Research Source         


Author: 303
Date: Jul 22, 2008 02:24

Anti-Wikipedia "screed monkeys" (Paul Hammond, 2008) in the Ivory
Tower too. Seems the anti-cabal, anti-corporatist anti-wikipedians are
everywhere:

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/21/education/21wikipedia.html?_r=3&oref=s

A History Department Bans Citing Wikipedia as a Research Source

Article Tools Sponsored By
By NOAM COHEN
Published: February 21, 2007

When half a dozen students in Neil Waters’s Japanese history class at
Middlebury College asserted on exams that the Jesuits supported the
Shimabara Rebellion in 17th-century Japan, he knew something was
wrong. The Jesuits were in “no position to aid a revolution,” he said;
the few of them in Japan were in hiding.

He figured out the problem soon enough. The obscure, though incorrect,
information was from Wikipedia, the collaborative online encyclopedia,
and the students had picked it up cramming for his exam.
Show full article (6.05Kb)
no comments
  More anti-wikipedia         


Author: Death to Haifan Bahaism
Date: Jul 22, 2008 01:16

When The Truth Becomes Distorted, Look For Pattern!
Monday, December 10, 2007
Wikipedia’s Web 2.0 Totalitarian Universe

Wikipedia's Web 2.0 Totalitarian Universe
Kurt Nimmo

Responding to a New York Times Magazine article where Wikipedia
founder Jimmy "Jimbo" Wales declared some "people are idiots and
shouldn't be writing," so long as Wikipedia and its fawnish minions
make the call, Cade Metz, writing for the Register, states the
obvious: "Despite its popular reputation as a Web 2.0 wonderland,
Wikipedia is not a democracy. But the totalitarian attitudes of the
site's ruling clique go much further than Jimbo cares to acknowledge."

Metz writes:

In early September, the Wikipedia inner circle banned edits from
1,000 homes and one massive online retailer in an attempt to suppress
the voice of one man.
Show full article (6.99Kb)
11 Comments
  BAHAIM IT COMMITTEE & WIKIPEDIA EDITORIAL TECHNIQUES OF FALSIFICATION         


Author: Death to Haifan Bahaism
Date: Jul 21, 2008 20:11

http://www.aetherometry.com/Electronic_Publications/Politics_of_Science/Antiwikipedia/awp_index...
[Left Hand Tab]

III - WAYS & MEANS OF THE CABAL

1. WAR OF ATTRITION

1.1. Simplest facts falsified

1.4. Constant degradation of info

2. RAMPANT ADMIN BIAS
2.1. False parameters of truth
2.2. Prosecutorial sport

3. RAMPANT ADMIN ABUSES

4. A POLITICS OF HARASSMENT
4.1. Gratuitous mutilation
4.2. Deliberate suppression of facts
4.3. Deliberate denigration
Show full article (0.89Kb)
3 Comments
  CAUTION - BEWARE OF DERMOD RYDER'S PRETENSIONS         


Author: Death to Haifan Bahaism
Date: Jul 21, 2008 18:07

Dermod Ryder writing as Asparagus::
http://groups.google.com/group/talk.religion.bahai/browse_thread/
thread/bd7e852c70316c9/d146728618637ab4?
lnk=st&q=Guardian&rnum=3#d146728618637ab4

"The Beloved Guardian assured us that those diseased people who
attacked the Cause of God would deservedly suffer and be destroyed
and behold, this vicious one was struck down exactly as you will be
destroyed for your wanton and outrageous lies and calumnies."

See also,
http://www.aetherometry.com/Electronic_Publications/Politics_of_Science/Antiwikipedia/Section_I...

See *Bahais In My Backyard*
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2877478116441126906&hl=en-AU

BAHAIM Tactics & Techniques

"Slanderous Vilification" = The Baha'i Technique - Ad Hominem, Libel,
Slander, Demonize, Scapegoat, Ostracize, Shun, Banish, Backbite,
Defame, Vilify, Discredit, Smear, Revile, Suppress, Attack, Bully,
Intimidate, Threaten, Malign, Blackball, Deceive, Coerce, Silence,
Harass... etc., etc.... CAUTION NON-BAHAIS
Show full article (1.76Kb)
no comments
  Quote of the Year         


Author: 303
Date: Jul 21, 2008 00:39

http://www.aetherometry.com/Electronic_Publications/Politics_of_Science/Antiwikipedia/Section_III_4...

Perhaps the reader should be reminded, at this point, that Wikipedia
determines what is Science, by counting the number of Google hits...
12 Comments
 
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9