|
|
Up |
|
|
  |
Author: AbraxasAbraxas
Date: Jul 10, 2006 21:53
Do you notice how these hayvanat do *exactly* what they accuse others
of doing, but when the Mirror is put in their faces and a heavy dose of
their own medicine is dished out to them, they cry foul like a dog
whose tail has just been stepped on. This is very much in keeping with
the tactics and technique of their "profit." He was doing the exact
same things and reacting in the same manner, eg. 'the poisoning
incident', 'the murder of Aba Wahid and the others in Acre' etc.
W
steveblomberg2@ yahoo.com wrote:
> Viv
> I asked you some basic questions and yet you run to Nima remarking on
> 'mini-skirt' ! You do seem to be obsessed with him.
> I would be happy with just a couple of Y/N from you.
>
> Steve
|
| |
|
| |
no comments
|
|
  |
Author: nareshguptanareshgupta
Date: Jul 10, 2006 20:13
Books On Religion & Philosophy (New Releases)
This is one time mail only. To subscribe our Newsletter, mail us your
interested subjects.
Indian Books Centre
In the Service of the Scholarly World since 1976
Dear Sir/ Madam,
Our company is one of the leading publishers and suppliers of books
related to following subjects:
Indian Art/ Archaeology; Ayurveda, Tibetan, Unani & Alternative
Medicine; Dictionary & Grammar; Religion & Philosophy (Hinduism,
Buddhism, Jainism and Christianity); Indian Music, Dance & Performing
Arts; Sri Lankan Studies; Women & Gender Studies; Yoga & Meditation;
Tantra Mantra Yantra & Astrology; Sanskrit & Related Studies. We have
over 1000 titles of our own and we stock Rare & more than 50,000
titles.
Request a Complete Catalogue * Provide Complete Postal Address
|
| Show full article (22.89Kb) |
|
| |
no comments
|
|
  |
Author: Baha'i Technicque - CAUTION non-baha'isBaha'i Technicque - CAUTION non-baha'is
Date: Jul 10, 2006 18:41
Caution - THE BAHAI TECHNIQUE
"Slanderous Vilification" = The Baha'i Technique - Ad Hominem, Libel,
Slander, Demonize, Scapegoat, Ostracize, Shun, Banish, Backbite,
Defame, Vilify, Discredit, Smear, Revile, Suppress, Attack, Bully,
Intimidate, Threaten, Malign, Blackball, Deceive, Coerce, Silence,
Harass... etc., etc.... CAUTION NON-BAHAIS
PaulHammond wrote:
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
Author: AyauscaGnosticAyauscaGnostic
Date: Jul 10, 2006 18:38
Caution - THE BAHAI TECHNIQUE
"Slanderous Vilification" = The Baha'i Technique - Ad Hominem, Libel,
Slander, Demonize, Scapegoat, Ostracize, Shun, Banish, Backbite,
Defame, Vilify, Discredit, Smear, Revile, Suppress, Attack, Bully,
Intimidate, Threaten, Malign, Blackball, Deceive, Coerce, Silence,
Harass... etc., etc.... CAUTION NON-BAHAIS
PaulHammond wrote:
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
Author: AyauscaGnosticAyauscaGnostic
Date: Jul 10, 2006 18:37
Caution - THE BAHAI TECHNIQUE
"Slanderous Vilification" = The Baha'i Technique - Ad Hominem, Libel,
Slander, Demonize, Scapegoat, Ostracize, Shun, Banish, Backbite,
Defame, Vilify, Discredit, Smear, Revile, Suppress, Attack, Bully,
Intimidate, Threaten, Malign, Blackball, Deceive, Coerce, Silence,
Harass... etc., etc.... CAUTION NON-BAHAIS
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
Author: DarrickDarrick
Date: Jul 10, 2006 16:03
What I have said is pure TRUTH! You have been indoctrinated into lies,
and falsehoods, politically movtivated. Open your eyes.
KMerabi@ usc.edu wrote:
> Darrick i have read this before from other sources, and this is
> actually one of the only things you are right about (more or less). you
> are right about these as they are consistant...
|
| Show full article (3.42Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
Author: rosscampbellrosscampbell
Date: Jul 10, 2006 11:03
Dear Keyvan,
You indicated by your comments in the thread: "What did Shoghi Effendi
mean..." that you are offended by my clause by clause analysis of your
post, and that you prefer a single, flowing response. I will try to
accommodate your wishes.
The sum total of all of your comments appears to be saying that because
'Abdu'l-Baha', in 1907, issued an Instruction that, in the event of His
death, the Universal House of Justice should be formed, evidently
without a Guardian of the Baha'i Faith as its "sacred head", at its
beginning, that a headless Universal House of Justice would suffice to
administer on Earth, not only during this "Formative Age" of the
Administration of the New world Order, while the World Commonwealth of
Baha'u'llah is at its earliest embryonic stage, but also during the
future "Golden Age", to the extent that a headless Universal House of
Justice could, alone, bereft of he accompanying sacred Institutions of
the Guardianship and the Hands of the Baha'i Faith, triumphantly bring
God's Kingdom to Earth.
|
| Show full article (8.51Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
Author: PaulHammondPaulHammond
Date: Jul 10, 2006 08:09
AyahuascaGnostic wrote:
> Viv wrote:
>>> Viv
>>> I asked you some basic questions and yet you run to Nima remarking on
>>> 'mini-skirt' ! You do seem to be obsessed with him.
>>> I would be happy with just a couple of Y/N from you.
>>>
>>> Steve
>>
>> Steve,
>>
>> You pal Nima (who has a history of sexism,
>
> Bald faced lie, libel, BS. Kindly detail this history.
>
Erm, how about this post here:
|
| Show full article (1.41Kb) |
|
4 Comments |
|
  |
Author: PaulHammondPaulHammond
Date: Jul 10, 2006 07:53
AyahuascaGnostic wrote:
> Viv/palu,
>
> If I didn't know better, I'd think you are totally infatuated by me.
> Are you *really* female, and how old are you? Single?? When was the
> last time you fitted into a mini-skirt?? ;-)
>
> W
See, I had always assumed that Viv was male - the assumption that
Viv is female came from Nima in the first place, IIRC - but then Viv
hasn't
made any definitive statement one way or the other so far as I can
recall, and hasn't protested at Nima's assumption - so what do I know?
Viv, of course, is one of those names that could be either male or
female (like "Sam") - of the top of my head, I can think of Vivienne
Westwood, the fashion designer, who is a famous female Viv, and
then there is Viv Richards, the West Indian cricketer, who is a
famous male Viv.
I couldn't care less either way, myself.
|
| Show full article (1.10Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: abbiyikliabbiyikli
Date: Jul 10, 2006 06:11
Who is The Dhat's Emissary-you or me or another person? as far as i can
see you dont have much faith in your God or Absolute. or you are too
weird for me to understand. good bye to you little all bad.
All Bad yazdi:
> abbiyikli wrote:
>
>> every religion has a form. in fact, it is a form itself . because by
>> form it belongs to our formal world. but as for its source, it does not
>> belong to this world, in this respect every religion comes from The
>> Essence (The Dhat) (acording to your religion, you can call him God,
>> Allah, Wakantanka etc.) every religious form comprises The Essence;
>> therefore, it is as if it were a crystallized form of The Essence. so
>> there is something transcent forms in esotoric ways like sufism because
>> they form the kernel of religions.
>> well, according to my definition what is heretic belief or religion? my
>> answer is simply that it is a form that has seperated and become
>> distant to The Essence. such kind of beliefs are empty shells and do
>> not have any kernel about The Truth. maybe they are just ways of
>> consoling people in this world. but The Truth is not consoling. if
>> there is any good in us, it comes from The Essence. if our sense of ...
|
| Show full article (1.71Kb) |
|
1 Comment |
|
|
|
|
|
|