> How can the people of the world, using the internet, organize a vote by the
> Tibetan people worldwide, inside and outside China? We could start outside
> first. We could use as a model a similar approach like Oprah-Tolle are
> doing, to reach out worldwide using modern internet, connecting the world,
> outside of control by governments. China has a government that does immense
> control, but that cannot last, and those days are numbered.http://www.oprah.com/obc_classic/webcast/archive/archive_watchnow.jsp
> The people will decide. The people will speak.

>ok we should have a wolrd wide democracy, let the entire world
>population vote on how to manage earth. don't cry when Chinese out
>vote nato alliance.

> "Yu" yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:2b41a7b0-8534-4fc8-8ce0-3ce49183a32d@s33g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
>

>>ok we should have a wolrd wide democracy, let the entire world
>>population vote on how to manage earth. don't cry when Chinese out
>>vote nato alliance.

>
> Only Tibetans will vote in my proposal. You claim to have done good for
> them, so why are you worried? I think we all know why.

>Wh don't you let

>the native american to decide whether the white europeans must return
>Europe?
>black american to decide whether they should be compensated with $100,
>000, 000, 000, 000 and 100, 000 tons of gold?
>the South Asian to decide whether the UK government should compensate
>them with $100, 000, 000, 000, 000 and 100, 000 tons of gold?
>the people in middle east to decide whether Israel should exist or
>not?

>Maybe those are what you really want, but they are not going to
>happen!

> yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:15b71df6-acd3-44ed-9a25-03eb1bf813b5@l42g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
>

>>Wh don't you let
>>the native american to decide whether the white europeans must return
>>Europe?
>>black american to decide whether they should be compensated with $100,
>>000, 000, 000, 000 and 100, 000 tons of gold?
>>the South Asian to decide whether the UK government should compensate
>>them with $100, 000, 000, 000, 000 and 100, 000 tons of gold?
>>the people in middle east to decide whether Israel should exist or
>>not?
>>Maybe those are what you really want, but they are not going to
>>happen!

>
> You claim that you are making a better Tibet for Tibetans. So, let's ask
> them what they think about your torturing, forced sterizations, etc. Israel
> makes no such promise to any Middle East country. If we want to know about ...

>BTW, Tibet was a part of China, according to the US government film
>made in 1944:

>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_tOtVQ7cNWY

>All chinese have a say in the tibet issue. Divide and conquer will
>work.

> yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:30cfd9a3-aede-4cf0-bb9f-1697966c604b@f63g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>

>>BTW, Tibet was a part of China, according to the US government film
>>made in 1944:
>>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_tOtVQ7cNWY
>>All chinese have a say in the tibet issue. Divide and conquer will
>>work.

>
> We already dealt with that film. It was a wartime video to get recruits and
> build up support. It's not about historical accuracy. If Tibet was part of
> China, why did they invade, conquer, occupy in the early 1950's? It wasn't
> like there was someone else who had taken them, separated them ,etc. They
> were there on their own, trying to keep all external hands off. They had
> their own language...

>You explanation about the film is unnecessary. I just want the fact
>known.

>China did not invade Tibet, Just like that America did not invade the
>Cnfederate states.

>Tibetans have their own languages, so? There are 56 languages spoken
>in China, do you suggest that China be divided into 56 pieces?

>Do you also know that Dalai Lama was the vice chairman of the Chinese
>People Congress in the 1950s? Here is a movie, where you can see Dalai
>Lama had photo taken with Mao under the Chinese national flag (, and a
>lot more if you know Chinese):

>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s8iC79teLvo

>Again, explanation is unnecessary.

> yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:9515af98-0c0d-40db-b888-05ab7562471b@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
>

>>You explanation about the film is unnecessary. I just want the fact
>>known.
>>China did not invade Tibet, Just like that America did not invade the
>>Cnfederate states.
>>Tibetans have their own languages, so? There are 56 languages spoken
>>in China, do you suggest that China be divided into 56 pieces?
>>Do you also know that Dalai Lama was the vice chairman of the Chinese
>>People Congress in the 1950s? Here is a movie, where you can see Dalai
>>Lama had photo taken with Mao under the Chinese national flag (, and a
>>lot more if you know Chinese):
>>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s8iC79teLvo
>>Again, explanation is unnecessary.

>
> Explanation needed to negate your incorrect implications.
> Where do they speak 56 languages daily in China? Chinese Multiple languages ...