> http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/africa/04/19/safrica.china/index.html
>
> The weapons are to be used by the government engaged in tyranny against the
> courageous Zimbabwe people. Over and over China supports the philosopy of
> government tyranny against the people. That is because the Chinese
> government itself is anything but a government of the people, so that view
> is all it can understand.  Over and over, we clearly see China defining
> itself, not by hollow words, but by it's actions we see it. Always, they are
> on the side of oppression of the people. Are they ever, speaking up and
> defending people agianst oppression, anywhere?

> http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/africa/04/19/safrica.china/index.html

>You are wrong Llama Breath. First of all the communist Chinese sided
>with the oppressed slaves of Tibet against the oppression of the
>nobles and monks. Have you ever wonder why none of the exiled
>Tibetans ever claimed to be a former serf and is fighting for his
>freedom to be a serf again? Did any say life as a serf was way better
>than life under communist Chinese?

>Of course the exiled Tibetans want the freedom to return to be lords
>in their little serfdoms. They don't want the freedom to punch a time-
>clock to earn their keep. Life in exile isn't bad. Western charity
>can afford to give an exile the life of Riley compared to the pennies
>that the Chinese can afford.

>The west thinks Tibetans live in terrible conditions whereas the
>Chinese are proud that they have raised the Tibetan standard of living
>so much. It's analogous to the west thinking how much they've helped
>the subhuman Third World.

> http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/africa/04/19/safrica.china/index.html
>
> The weapons are to be used by the government engaged in tyranny against the
> courageous Zimbabwe people. Over and over China supports the philosopy of
> government tyranny against the people. That is because the Chinese
> government itself is anything but a government of the people, so that view
> is all it can understand.  Over and over, we clearly see China defining
> itself, not by hollow words, but by it's actions we see it. Always, they are
> on the side of oppression of the people. Are they ever, speaking up and
> defending people agianst oppression, anywhere?

>
> "James" hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:b68139a6-3d8b-4681-a64c-4d001e9cefc9@m3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> On Apr 19, 4:09 pm, "RussellT" telus.net> wrote:

>> http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/africa/04/19/safrica.china/index.html

>

>>You are wrong Llama Breath. First of all the communist Chinese sided
>>with the oppressed slaves of Tibet against the oppression of the
>>nobles and monks. Have you ever wonder why none of the exiled
>>Tibetans ever claimed to be a former serf and is fighting for his
>>freedom to be a serf again? Did any say life as a serf was way better
>>than life under communist Chinese?

>

>>Of course the exiled Tibetans want the freedom to return to be lords
>>in their little serfdoms. They don't want the freedom to punch a time-
>>clock to earn their keep. Life in exile isn't bad. Western charity
>>can afford to give an exile the life of Riley compared to the pennies
>>that the Chinese can afford. ...

> James certainly isn't illogical or irrelevant in his opinion. The Tibetan
> people you are supporting
> outside of Tibet are the gangs who supressed their own people when they
> were in power. China...

>
> "john" ozemail.com.au> wrote in message
> news:480a7218$0$29942$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>

>> James certainly isn't illogical or irrelevant in his opinion. The
>> Tibetan
>> people you are supporting
>> outside of Tibet are the gangs who supressed their own people when they
>> were in power. China
>> did not invade Tibet. If you don't know the facts about Tibet then learn
>> it. Tibet was part of
>> China for centuries well before the exisitance of USA. To say China
>> invaded Tibet is like
>> saying US invaded Virginia so stop lying. Is Chinese view different to
>> US
>> ? US supported
>> oppressive government such as Kingdom of Saudi Arabia for more than 40+
>> years and ...

>
> "RussellT" telus.net> wrote in message
> news:BbvOj.568$PM5.477@edtnps92...

>>
>> "john" ozemail.com.au> wrote in message
>> news:480a7218$0$29942$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>>

>>> James certainly isn't illogical or irrelevant in his opinion. The
>>> Tibetan
>>> people you are supporting
>>> outside of Tibet are the gangs who supressed their own people when they
>>> were in power. China
>>> did not invade Tibet. If you don't know the facts about Tibet then learn
>>> it. Tibet was part of
>>> China for centuries well before the exisitance of USA. To say China
>>> invaded Tibet is like
>>> saying US invaded Virginia so stop lying. Is Chinese view different to
>>> US ...

> http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/africa/04/19/safrica.china/index.html

> The weapons are to be used by the government engaged in tyranny against the
> courageous Zimbabwe people. Over and over China supports the philosopy of
> government tyranny against the people. That is because the Chinese
> government itself is anything but a government of the people, so that view
> is all it can understand.  Over and over, we clearly see China defining
> itself, not by hollow words, but by it's actions we see it. Always, they are
> on the side of oppression of the people. Are they ever, speaking up and
> defending people agianst oppression, anywhere?

>
> "RussellT" telus.net> wrote in message
> news:BbvOj.568$PM5.477@edtnps92...

>>
>> "john" ozemail.com.au> wrote in message
>> news:480a7218$0$29942$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>>

>>> James certainly isn't illogical or irrelevant in his opinion. The
>>> Tibetan
>>> people you are supporting
>>> outside of Tibet are the gangs who supressed their own people when they
>>> were in power. China
>>> did not invade Tibet. If you don't know the facts about Tibet then learn
>>> it. Tibet was part of
>>> China for centuries well before the exisitance of USA. To say China
>>> invaded Tibet is like
>>> saying US invaded Virginia so stop lying. Is Chinese view different to
>>> US ...