Published on Tuesday, August 19, 2008 by CommonDreams.org

G8 Clueless on Food Policy

by Jim Goodman

In June the G8 (Group of Eight; Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan,
Russia, United Kingdom and the United States), the rulers of the
industrialized north, the power brokers of the world, met in Kobe, Japan.
They meet annually to discuss topics of mutual and global concern. Not
surprisingly, according to ABC News, the World Food Crisis and Africa were
in the spotlight.

And what better way to prepare for intense discussions of the World Food
Crisis than to start the meetings off with the "Blessings of the Earth and
Sea Social Dinner," an eight-course, eighteen-dish banquet accompanied by
five wines from around the world. While fifteen guests were invited, the
leaders of Ethiopia, Tanzania and Senegal (who had taken part in the
meetings that day) were not among them. Earlier that day UK Prime Minister
Gordon Brown urged the world to reduce their "unnecessary demand" for food.
Apparently he wasn't speaking to the G8 leaders.

Does the G8 really understand the food crisis? I don't think they have a
clue. An eight-course banquet? How demeaning. They invite leaders from
African countries affected by the food crisis, hear their pleas, but
certainly, do not let them interfere with their agenda, their industrial
development, their pleasure.

While floods, droughts and climate change are contributing factors, they are
not the cause of the current worldwide food crisis. The G8's pet projects,
international trade, finance and corporate policy are the real cause of the
food crisis. Does the G8 propose anything in the way of solutions to the
food crisis or just more of the same, more of what caused the problem in the
first place? Do they support anything other than the failed agenda of the
Bush Administration? Policies which include:

-Removing export restrictions (So countries trying to protect their domestic
food supplies by prohibiting export of food crops, like rice, are not
allowed to do so).

-Successful conclusion of the Doha round of the World Trade Organization
(WTO) (So food deficit countries cannot protect their domestic food
production and farmers, but must produce commodity crops for sale on the
world market).

-Increased access to Genetically Modified (GM) crops in food deficit
countries. ( The White House supports the use of GM drought resistant crops,
but those crops do not exist. GM crops have done nothing to lessen hunger
anywhere in the world. Farmers in Africa cannot afford the seed, the
fertilizer or the pesticides that GM crops require. African farmers stand a
better chance of feeding their people with traditional crops. They do not
need GM seed; they need roads, storage facilities, credit, investment in
small scale agriculture and more democracy).

As the Democratic and Republican delegates move into discussions of their
respective party platforms, they could move US foreign policy in a new
direction. A new president, from whatever party, with a rational agenda
could move the G8 to effect progressive change in Africa and elsewhere.

A new President could forgo the call of the banquet bell and listen to the
farmers, farm workers and social justice advocates on the ground in Africa,
perhaps join them for a meal of foufou and millet. See what it means to be
hungry and listen to their pleas for Food Sovereignty.

A new President could insist it is time the G8 stops forcing the world to
accept the expensive and failed trade policies of the WTO and the World
Bank. Stop the unquestioning support of Monsanto, Dow, Cargill and the rest
of the multi-national agribusiness giants who see their profit as being
transcendent over the lives of farmers, workers and the people of entire
continents.

National elections should motivate us. Clearly, most Americans are not
pleased with the direction we have taken for the last eight years at home or
abroad. In the eyes of the world we are no longer a compassionate nation.
There are 800 million starving people in the world and 1 billion overweight
people. It is time for a policy change. Delegates heading for St. Paul and
Denver should think about that and they should think about how their party
platforms could move the G8 to change world food policy.

Jim Goodman is a farmer in Wonewoc and a policy fellow for the Food and
Society Fellows Program .

--
NOTICE: This post contains copyrighted material the use of which has not
always been authorized by the copyright owner. I am making such material
available to advance understanding of
political, human rights, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues. I
believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright
Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107

"A little patience and we shall see the reign of witches pass over, their
spells dissolve, and the people recovering their true sight, restore their
government to its true principles. It is true that in the meantime we are
suffering deeply in spirit,
and incurring the horrors of a war and long oppressions of enormous public
debt. But if the game runs sometimes against us at home we must have
patience till luck turns, and then we shall have an opportunity of winning
back the principles we have lost, for this is a game where principles are at
stake."
-Thomas Jefferson