> On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 05:55:51 +0000, GW Chimpzilla's Eye-Rack Neocon Utopia
> replied to the best of all possible persons:
>

>> Dr. Pangloss wrote:
>>

>>> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 21:00:44 -0700, Bush War is for GOP Profit replied
>>> to
>>> the best of all possible persons:
>>>

>>>> Hey Hastert, why not just do the right thing and resign because you
>>>> majorly fucked up? how about that reason?
>>>>
>>>>he Democrats are so desperate that they once again stoop to smear
>>>>tactics

>>> and dirty tricks, which as all of you are well aware even if you are
>>> reluctant to admit it, is their hallmark and trademark.
>>>
>>> This whole business of 'who knew what when' is a concoction of the
>>> Democrats, Soros, and liberal media outlet ABC News:
>>>
>>> http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/politics/15681144.htm
>>>
>>> "When asked about a groundswell of discontent among the GOP's
>>> conservative
>>> base over his handling of the issue, Hastert said: "I think the base has
>>> to realize after awhile, who knew about it? Who knew what, when? When
>>> the
>>> base finds out who's feeding this monster, they're not going to be
>>> happy.
>>> The people who want to see this thing blow up are ABC News and a lot of
>>> Democratic operatives, people funded by George Soros.""
>>>
>>> I would not be at all surprised to find that the Foley emails were a
>>> Demmie hack job, like the Dems' practice of doctoring Diebold machines
>>> to
>>> tamper with elections. Foley could be completely innocent too,
>>> because nothing illegal happened despite text that relates to the GOP
>>> member's org*sms in one of those page emails: those GOP org*sms are not
>>> necessarily illegal, even if amoral. Could Foley be a Demmie mole or
>>> plant? There's no level the Dems won't stoop to to get at innocent GOP
>>> operatives.
>>>
>>> Respectfully Yours,
>>>
>>> Dr. Pangloss

>> Thanks for the laugh.

>
> We are not amused.