The key phrase here is "seemed to", not "altered".
On Jan 28, 1:02 pm, "Brian Downstairs"
blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:> Well, I beg to differ. I agree that she was very odd in behaviour and
> seemed to alter her beliefs simply to piss people off, and eventually folk
> decided to, as the saying goes, send her to Coventry. I did not and do not
> agree with that sort of thing, as no matter waht that person is still human,
> and can be just ignored by those not wanting to engage.
> There really is not need to get vindictive as did tend to happen in some
> quarters, as if that person personally owned the group, In a way, they were
> doing exactly what the accused was doing. and its really not right.
> In them old days of shell accounts and no web sites, there were almost
> secret societies with very strange practices here, but one has to adapt to
> the new realities, of people who see this as just long lived chatlines and
> of course places to sit and annoy people.
>
> Brian being deliberately argumentative.
>
> --
>
> mildew_spo...@
blueyonder.co.uk
> I hope I grow on you...
> I'm a Fungi!!!
>
> If you send me pictures, you deserve a spanking!
> I'm blind you see!"Lusus Naturae"
pobox.com> wrote in message
>
> news:0vajl5h4l9ldf2cu53q6cdonu9hc15f2i3@4ax.com...
>
>
>>> There was no relentless antagonism -- at least early on. In fact, there
>> was a curious and pernicious lack of antagonism at times. And the
>> relentlessness was entirely on the side of the disrupter.
>> --
