On May 12, 5:06 pm, Spell baby.net> wrote:
> According to canadian government websites, canada spent a hell of a
> lot of time and money creating false assumptions about men at or below
> poverty line.
Well, no skin off of your ass, because that wouldn't include you, at
> Is this an I-gotcha issue?
If the topic is whether or not we've caught you popping a Valium,
then, it is.
> Does it help build a case over sexism in the Canadian government?
That case is long since built, Angry Mom.
It was built by male-feminist liberals, like Rod "Tonto" Mechelen, &
Grizzlie Lapjob, who needed cheap & lightly-used Neo-con sportscoats
to augment all of their Affirmative Action grooming for their entry
into the White Man's world - as part of the new establishment-oriented
minority culture (Uncle Toms). They pretended to be white for a while
& eventually moved on to Obamics.
The problem is that only a microcosm of those, who actually have an
interest in putting such a dossier to use, have the spine to apply the
word, to the problem, that you just applied: "Sexism".
Unfortunately, the "mad dads" are all ignorant, semi-educated,
pussywhipped white trash (especially, your Brits...) who would rather
go down with the ship, by living in the past while getting their asses
kicked, than to survive by getting with the program and making the new
rules of modern life work to their advantage. They're not going to
change shit, and they know it. They're just too misled and mediocre
Their lip-syncing leaders know better, but aspire to nothing more than
personal careers as right wing, talk-media gurus ...possibly leading
to the publishing & sales of empty, idiotic & repetitious reactionary
books, containing the recycled views of others, and other get-rich,
lucrative schemes, based on safe protest. (The failed, brief
publishing career of David "Shorty" Morrow is one such obscene
Both sides of their dud phenomenon evince a major problem with
capitalizing on the "sexist" angle of the violations committed within
the "equality" scam, and it's truly laughable to identify the ones who
object the loudest. The ones who obstruct the most by insisting that
we run the cleanest, noblest, most honorable movement (regardless of
the loud shrieks rising from the great number of us being fed, like
Christians, to the lions) are invariably the most opportunistic, self-
seeking, cowardly backstabbing bastards and pitiful specimens of male
meat to be found. They're just a bunch of characters hiding, within
"safe" roles. This, of course, also defines the cross-over
So, any more "building a case" is just overkill. It's time for MEN to
apply what we know.
> (lets not forget the 'established' connection between poverty and
> crime often used by the same social engineers).
This is not about capitalism vs. socialism. It is about Men being
systematically oppressed by another group (women) and fighting back
against that group through strategies involving class warfare. The
ones who want to keep us playing cowboys & indians are the generally
the nepotists and the (hypocritical) non-private sector employees who
are protecting the economic advantages that they've gained by means of
class warfare ...Therefore, let us not forget the established
connection between your head and your ass.
- - -
You have, again, found yourself dissed, by:
I have such sites to show you...
"He who changeth, altereth, misconstrueth, argueth with, deleteth, or
maketh a lie about these words or causeth them to not be known shall
burn in hell forever and ever...."