|
|
 Up |
|
  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author: The GreatestThe Greatest
Date: Jun 8, 2010 04:17
> In article <3qged6.8ig.19.1@ news.alt.net>,
> Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries earthling.net> wrote:>>
>>I obviously have no idea what you're talking about.
>>
>>
>>Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
>
>
> What I'm talkin about is a you and me redhot session in the bubble
> bath with a bottle of Vino Collapso and some Red Hot Chile Peppers
> vids blasting from the surround-sound system in a Vegas penthouse
> this weekend.
>
> Massive oral tittilation, and spank-me harder Daddy lesson you've
> never before dreamt of....
>
> you in?
> -- ...
|
| Show full article (0.76Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: Koos Nolst TreniteKoos Nolst Trenite
Date: Jun 8, 2010 02:40
'
________
Preamble (of 20100518, revised 20100607)
You have been made, and are being kept (by Criminal Minds) so
INCONCEIVABLY, so Destructively, so Nauseatingly Stupid... *(a)
that you even DENY the existence, in "science," of those
(of Criminal Minds) who MAKE you so, and you are made to
DENY (by Criminal Minds) HOW they do so,
not to mention, your desire or compulsion - which is inflicted
in you equally by Criminal Minds, and of which you are equally
made to DENY, HOW they do so - to KEEP yourself and to KEEP
others that INCONCEIVABLY, that Destructively and Nauseatingly
Stupid*
- but you certainly know
of Criminal Minds (including such who are teachers
or parents or religious leaders or government
personnel, and you know of any other dictators)
|
| Show full article (23.68Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: PolishKnightPolishKnight
Date: Jun 7, 2010 23:43
In article
x27g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
Linda hotmail.com> wrote:
> X-No-Archive:
> On Jun 7, 9:56
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: ShrikebackShrikeback
Date: Jun 1, 2010 09:14
On May 29, 9:08 pm, BE-VA testland.org> wrote:> On Sat, 29 May 2010 12:14:13 -0400, ¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) ••
> Fudgepacker wrote
> (in article ):
>
>
>
>
>
>> Homosexuality is not a healthy lifestyle, physically or mentally. Weak
>> mentally unstable individuals choose to engage in homosexual activities,
>> they are not born "gay."
>
>> Homosexuals cannot provide a family environment for children, see Frank
>> Lombard, homosexual pedophile from Duke. Homosexuals are determined to
>> poison the minds of children by using a "normalizing" agenda to make
>> their filthy habits appear common place. They are also actively working
>> to remove all legislation protecting children from sexual predators.
>
>> Homosexuals are disease carriers. They engage in risky sexual habits ...
|
| Show full article (1.73Kb) |
|
5 Comments |
|
|
Author: RamRod Sword of BaalRamRod Sword of Baal
Date: Jun 1, 2010 08:55
> On Mon, 31 May 2010 12:39:12 -0400, RamRod Sword of Baal wrote
> (in article news-server.bigpond.net.au>):
>>>>>>> There is nothing normal about a man putting a penis that has been up
>>>>>> his
>>>>>> own rectum, and covered with his own shit in his mouth. It's sick,
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> act of a mentally ill degenerate.
>>>>>
>>>>> And they do pay a terrible price for their promiscuity and
>>>>> uncleanliness.
>>>>> More than 300,000 homosexual males died from AIDS in the US between
>>>>> 1980 and 1995 ...
|
| Show full article (1.75Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: DustbinDustbin
Date: Jun 1, 2010 08:54
George Orwell wrote:
> "Aaron" home.net> wrote in message news:ddt5069fat70j5g9n47qkt4d6glnq7bbhc@4ax.com...>>
>> Gaza really should be liberated from the Islamic terrorists who have
>> invaded and seized the land from Israel.
>>
>
This is the horror that pervades our world.
The reverse is true; it has laways been the jews that do the invading -
just as they did 3,500 years ago. The jews are the occupiers and the
jews are the problem in the middle east. The secondary problem is that
western governments will not recognise the right of the Palestinians to
their homeland as promised to the them by the british.
In teh late 1940s David Begurion drove the vilagers for something like
500-600 villages to make way for jewish settlers. If anyone did that the
the british we would surely be outraged and doing something about it. I
bet the yanks would too.
Yet we seem to think that it is okay to force the Palestinians off their
land and n prtend thethe jews havv somekind of right to be thee.
|
| Show full article (1.21Kb) |
|
1 Comment |
|
|
Author: Mark BorgersonMark Borgerson
Date: Jun 1, 2010 05:16
In article news.giganews.com>,
marek1965@comcast.net says...> It's a topic that we've danced around for years for years on soc.men and
> in the men's rights movement, but not really addressed head on. I'm not
> pretending that this article is a complete solution but at least helps
> to scope the problem.
>
> Let's start out with this daring proposition: Men's rights are human
> rights. When men's rights are infringed or undermined, then society and
> women and children suffer in the long run. When men's rights are
> protected and affluence enhanced, society and women and children benefit.
Are you mixing apples and oranges to include affluence in the list?
>
> Note that protection of men's rights is not equivalent to denying women
> rights (human or civil) as in the case of non-western...
|
| Show full article (9.12Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author: DustbinDustbin
Date: May 14, 2010 09:21
John Doe wrote:
> Since women are generally defenseless, do they even believe in self
> defense? Or are they mostly clueless about self defense? And what is
> women in high places doing to our country? Is that why 19 box knife
> carrying cave dwellers were allowed to kill 3000 of our people? Is
> that why we cannot stop illegal immigration? Maybe women make good
> underlings for liberal politicians, but to what end?
>
> Barack Obama's last Supreme Court appointment, Sonia Sotomayor,
> supposedly the most intelligent female mind in our country, acts
> clueless when asked simple questions about self-defense.
>
> In the July 2009 supreme court nominee hearings, Sonia Sotomayor
> being questioned by Tom Coburn...
>
> COBURN: As a
> citizen of this country, do you believe innately in my ability to
> have self-defense of myself -- personal self-defense? Do I have a
> right to personal self-defense?
> ...
|
| Show full article (2.83Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
|
|
