In addition to what I've discovered, and my having been trying in my
dyslexic encrypted ways to share about Venus and our moon for the past
8+ years and counting, it seems there's lots more to behold about good
old Earth that's worth our knowing and sharing, such as the many
interesting discoveries and subsequent topics within the following
link:
www.beforeus.com
Other than deductively interpreting via observationology as to what
looks so perfectly intelligent/artificial of the Venus tarmac,
township/community of large structures, plus the surrounding
infrastructure and of that nearby bridge as looking so gosh darn
rational, I can't be absolutely certain about other intelligent life
still existing/coexisting on Venus, but at least the regular laws of
physics and of the best available science can't possibly exclude such,
because even us humans along with a sufficient degree of applied
technology could make a go of it, especially as representing ETs
capable of getting ourselves to/from Venus would in of itself offer
more than sufficient technological expertise for accommodating an
extended stay in spite of all that geothermally forced environment of
Venus being so geologically newish, hot and otherwise nasty from the
bottom up, and not as we've been told as being entirely greenhouse
roasted from the top down.
. - Brad Guth
On Mar 6, 9:47 am, BradGuth
gmail.com> wrote:> Though many official image archives exist, thanks again to our once
> upon a time Usenet contributor "tomcat", for having posted the
> optional link to this somewhat older but updated collective page of
> our Venus surface
images.http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/thumbnail_pages/venus_thumbnails.html
>
> Some of the most interesting of natural as well as AI(artificial
> intelligence) worthy information can be found within image No.17 from
> the top left, as clearly situated within the 225 m/pixel composite
> frame of view by way of such radar imaging obtained pixels that just
> so happens to include the robust, rather sizable and somewhat complex
> community of structures with 'GUTH Venus', of which by all means you
> should apply your very own PhotoShop or Photo whatever resampling/
> enlargement of at least 3X, along with using whatever's your best
> unsharp-mask filter plus other image cleaning or contrast options
> you'd care to apply. Try to remember, that a purely negative or
> naysay mindset of a true rusemaster or of faith-based formulated
> denial simply can not accomplish such PhotoShop enlargements, at least
> not without making this image look far worse off than it really is.
>
> "Lava channels, Lo Shen Valles, Venus from Magellan Cycle 1"
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/html/object_page/mgn_c115s095_1.htmlhttp://nssdc...
>
> First of all, you do not have to be an Einstein or most any other kind
> of wizard, just as long as you're not deductive impaired, logic
> impaired or faith-based mindset against ETs existing/coexisting upon
> other than Earth. Not that Earth isn't entirely extra special and
> perhaps far between similar wet and badly polluted worlds capable of
> accommodating our forms of complex life as is, as well as in the buff,
> so to speak.
>
> Speaking of other worlds; if you still can not manage to zoom in and/
> or enlarge sufficiently in order to find this complex community of
> interesting pixels on your own, much less properly photo enlarge for a
> somewhat better view, then perhaps you are not nearly as good at basic
> observationology as you think you are. Remember that the small
> details of the Venus terrain are in fact quite visible and of
> impressive geology formations as is, and of whatever else is looking
> as though intelligent created or as modified to suit are those items
> of somewhat larger pixel patterns. So, in all fairness you can't
> possibly claim seeing one set of pixels as forming a given pattern
> related to whatever is perfectly natural, as clearly being the case,
> and then not deductively interpret those of other pixels of them more
> substantial patterns that look as though anything but natural, or
> perhaps that's just my open mindset and otherwise deductive logic
> kicking in.
> - Brad Guth -
