> Though many official image archives exist, thanks again to our once
> upon a time Usenet contributor "tomcat", for having posted the
> optional link to this somewhat older but updated collective page of
> our Venus surface images.http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/thumbnail_pages/venus_thumbnails.html
>
> Some of the most interesting of natural as well as AI(artificial
> intelligence) worthy information can be found within image No.17 from
> the top left, as clearly situated within the 225 m/pixel composite
> frame of view by way of such radar imaging obtained pixels that just
> so happens to include the robust, rather sizable and somewhat complex
> community of structures with 'GUTH Venus', of which by all means you
> should apply your very own PhotoShop or Photo whatever resampling/
> enlargement of at least 3X, along with using whatever's your best
> unsharp-mask filter plus other image cleaning or contrast options
> you'd care to apply. Try to remember, that a purely negative or
> naysay mindset of a true rusemaster or of faith-based formulated
> denial simply can not accomplish such PhotoShop enlargements, at least
> not without making this image look far worse off than it really is.
>
> "Lava channels, Lo Shen Valles, Venus from Magellan Cycle 1"http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/html/object_page/mgn_c115s095_1.htmlhttp://nssdc...
>
> First of all, you do not have to be an Einstein or most any other kind
> of wizard, just as long as you're not deductive impaired, logic
> impaired or faith-based mindset against ETs existing/coexisting upon
> other than Earth. Not that Earth isn't entirely extra special and
> perhaps far between similar wet and badly polluted worlds capable of
> accommodating our forms of complex life as is, as well as in the buff,
> so to speak.
>
> Speaking of other worlds; if you still can not manage to zoom in and/
> or enlarge sufficiently in order to find this complex community of
> interesting pixels on your own, much less properly photo enlarge for a
> somewhat better view, then perhaps you are not nearly as good at basic
> observationology as you think you are. Remember that the small
> details of the Venus terrain are in fact quite visible and of
> impressive geology formations as is, and of whatever else is looking
> as though intelligent created or as modified to suit are those items
> of somewhat larger pixel patterns. So, in all fairness you can't
> possibly claim seeing one set of pixels as forming a given pattern
> related to whatever is perfectly natural, as clearly being the case,
> and then not deductively interpret those of other pixels of them more
> substantial patterns that look as though anything but natural, or
> perhaps that's just my open mindset and otherwise deductive logic
> kicking in.
> - Brad Guth -