|
|
 Up |
|
  |
Author: BradGuthBradGuth Date: Mar 24, 2008 19:59
On Mar 24, 8:59 am, Saul Levy cox.net> wrote:> You just made up that term, Brad! lmao!
>
> You aren't fooling us. The term is meaningless.
>
> Saul Levy
>
> On Sun, 23 Mar 2008 20:23:16 -0700 (PDT), BradGuth
>
> gmail.com> wrote:>>On Mar 23, 3:38 pm, Saul Levy cox.net> wrote:>>> Don't act DUMB with me, Brad! lmao!
>
>>> The word observation is enough...
>
>>> Saul Levy
>>>>> On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 16:30:52 -0700 (PDT), BradGuth
>>OBSERVATIONOLOGY is a science that I'm good at, and obviously you are
>>not. Get over it.
>>. - Brad Guth ...
|
| Show full article (1.00Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: BradGuthBradGuth Date: Mar 24, 2008 20:00
On Mar 21, 7:44 pm, Saul Levy cox.net> wrote:> The exact opposite, Brad! lmao!
>
> You are just a WACKO NUTJOB! lmao!
>
> Saul Levy
>
> On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 16:26:19 -0700 (PDT), BradGuth
>
> gmail.com> wrote:>>Unlike yourself, I'm willing to share the best available science as
>>based upon the regular laws of physics, as offered to the free world
>>that obviously you and others of your pretend-atheism kind do not want
>>any such free world to exist.
>
>>BTW, you never did say what scares you so about intelligent other life
>>existing/coexisting on Venus.
>>. - Brad Guth
|
| Show full article (0.67Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: BradGuthBradGuth Date: Mar 25, 2008 01:02
On Mar 24, 12:52 pm, Saul Levy cox.net> wrote:> What the fuck are you talking about now, Brad? lmao!
>
> Everything you write about is meaningless DRIVEL! lmao!
>
> Saul Levy
>
> On Mon, 24 Mar 2008 11:59:20 -0700 (PDT), BradGuth
>
> gmail.com> wrote:>>On Mar 24, 8:59 am, Saul Levy cox.net> wrote:>>> You just made up that term, Brad! lmao!
>
>>> You aren't fooling us. The term is meaningless.
>
>>> Saul Levy
>
>>> On Sun, 23 Mar 2008 20:23:16 -0700 (PDT), BradGuth
>
>>> gmail.com> wrote: ...
|
| Show full article (1.74Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: BradGuthBradGuth Date: Mar 26, 2008 05:43
On Mar 6, 9:47 am, BradGuth gmail.com> wrote:> Though many official image archives exist, thanks again to our once
> upon a time Usenet contributor "tomcat", for having posted the
> optional link to this somewhat older but updated collective page of
> our Venus surface images.http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/thumbnail_pages/venus_thumbnails.html
>
> Some of the most interesting of natural as well as AI(artificial
> intelligence) worthy information can be found within image No.17 from
> the top left, as clearly situated within the 225 m/pixel composite
> frame of view by way of such radar imaging obtained pixels that just
> so happens to include the robust, rather sizable and somewhat complex
> community of structures with 'GUTH Venus', of which by all means you
> should apply your very own PhotoShop or Photo whatever resampling/
> enlargement of at least 3X, along with using whatever's your best
> unsharp-mask filter plus other image cleaning or contrast options
> you'd care to apply. Try to remember, that a purely negative or
> naysay mindset of a true rusemaster or of faith-based formulated
> denial simply can not accomplish such PhotoShop enlargements, at least
> not without making this image look far worse off than it really is.
> ...
|
| Show full article (3.05Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: BradGuthBradGuth Date: Mar 27, 2008 21:16
On Mar 25, 8:43 pm, BradGuth gmail.com> wrote:> On Mar 6, 9:47 am, BradGuth gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>
>> Some of the most interesting of natural as well as AI(artificial
>> intelligence) worthy information can be found within image No.17 from
>> the top left, as clearly situated within the 225 m/pixel composite
>> frame of view by way of such radar imaging obtained pixels that just
>> so happens to include the robust, rather sizable and somewhat complex
>> community of structures with 'GUTH Venus', of which by all means you
>> should apply your very own PhotoShop or Photo whatever resampling/
>> enlargement of at least 3X, along with using whatever's your best
>> unsharp-mask filter plus other image cleaning or contrast options
>> you'd care to apply. Try to remember, that a purely negative or ...
|
| Show full article (3.57Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: BradGuthBradGuth Date: Mar 28, 2008 19:07
On Mar 6, 9:47 am, BradGuth gmail.com> wrote:> Though many official image archives exist, thanks again to our once
> upon a time Usenet contributor "tomcat", for having posted the
> optional link to this somewhat older but updated collective page of
> our Venus surface images.http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/thumbnail_pages/venus_thumbnails.html
>
> Some of the most interesting of natural as well as AI(artificial
> intelligence) worthy information can be found within image No.17 from
> the top left, as clearly situated within the 225 m/pixel composite
> frame of view by way of such radar imaging obtained pixels that just
> so happens to include the robust, rather sizable and somewhat complex
> community of structures with 'GUTH Venus', of which by all means you
> should apply your very own PhotoShop or Photo whatever resampling/
> enlargement of at least 3X, along with using whatever's your best
> unsharp-mask filter plus other image cleaning or contrast options
> you'd care to apply. Try to remember, that a purely negative or
> naysay mindset of a true rusemaster or of faith-based formulated
> denial simply can not accomplish such PhotoShop enlargements, at least
> not without making this image look far worse off than it really is.
> ...
|
| Show full article (4.24Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: BradGuthBradGuth Date: Mar 29, 2008 00:38
Mars at best is a seriously cold energy pit or sinkhole of a mostly
frozen to death and nearly moon like vacuum of an old dead planet w/o
magnetosphere, as well as offering hardly a spare geothermal BTU or
accessible joule worth of core heat, as otherwise barely survivable by
way of whatever technology and energy is brought along for the ride
that's capable of keeping us frail humans alive until there's simply
not enough undamaged DNA to go around.
On the other hand, compared to this following terrestrial energy
alternative that works it's environmentally friendly form of clean/
renewable worth of low energy density footprint magic (on average
offering less than 0.5w/m2), of giving us its solar thermal and
atmospheric pressure differential derived energy by way of each sunny
day, and as such capable of offering a clean 200 MW worth of peak
energy output, whereas at best isn't hardly worth 0.1%% of what an
entirely similar vertical stack or vertical atmospheric wind and
pressure differential generating tower could produce on Venus, except
continuously by day or night rather than peak limited as of high noon
on Earth.
|
| Show full article (5.48Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: ahah Date: Mar 29, 2008 15:32
BradGuth wrote:
> On Mar 6, 9:47 am, BradGuth gmail.com> wrote:>> Though many official image archives exist, thanks again to our once
>> upon a time Usenet contributor "tomcat", for having posted the
>> optional link to this somewhat older but updated collective page of
>> our Venus surface images.http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/thumbnail_pages/venus_thumbnails.html
>>
>> Some of the most interesting of natural as well as AI(artificial
>> intelligence) worthy information can be found within image No.17 from
>> the top left, as clearly situated within the 225 m/pixel composite
>> frame of view by way of such radar imaging obtained pixels that just
>> so happens to include the robust, rather sizable and somewhat complex
>> community of structures with 'GUTH Venus', of which by all means you
>> should apply your very own PhotoShop or Photo whatever resampling/
>> enlargement of at least 3X, along with using whatever's your best
>> unsharp-mask filter plus other image cleaning or contrast options
>> you'd care to apply. Try to remember, that a purely negative or
>> naysay mindset of a true rusemaster or of faith-based formulated
>> denial simply can not accomplish such PhotoShop enlargements, at least
>> not without making this image look far worse off than it really is. ...
|
| Show full article (3.15Kb) |
| 1 Comment |
|
|
Author: BradGuthBradGuth Date: Mar 29, 2008 22:36
On Mar 29, 6:32 am, ah gmail.com> wrote:> BradGuth wrote:
>> On Mar 6, 9:47 am, BradGuth gmail.com> wrote:>
>>> Some of the most interesting of natural as well as AI(artificial
>>> intelligence) worthy information can be found within image No.17 from
>>> the top left, as clearly situated within the 225 m/pixel composite
>>> frame of view by way of such radar imaging obtained pixels that just
>>> so happens to include the robust, rather sizable and somewhat complex
>>> community of structures with 'GUTHVenus', of which by all means you
>>> should apply your very own PhotoShop or Photo whatever resampling/
>>> enlargement of at least 3X, along with using whatever's your best
>>> unsharp-mask filter plus other image cleaning or contrast options
>>> you'd care to apply. Try to remember, that a purely negative or
>>> naysay mindset of a true rusemaster or of faith-based formulated
>>> denial simply can not accomplish such PhotoShop enlargements, at least ...
|
| Show full article (3.91Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Raymond SpeerRaymond Speer Date: Mar 30, 2008 16:11
Dear Mr. Guth ----
Please get to your point.
Are you telling us that you think you have seen cities on Venus?
Do you agree with George Adamski that Venus has air and temperature
equivalent to the Southwest states of the United States?
Yours Truly, Ray Speer
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
