Obama is shot by a gunman
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
soc.history.whatif only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

soc.history.whatif Profile…
 Up
Obama is shot by a gunman         


Author: SolomonW
Date: Jun 15, 2008 02:30

Last week, I read that Obama has had federal protection since May of
2007. That is the earliest any presidential candidate have received such
protection. Obviously they are worried.

What happens if a gunman takes a shot at him and

1) Obama lives, reasons, speaks and decided to continue. However many
feel that he is clearly medically unfit to run including some but not
all of his doctors.

2) He lives, reasons and speak but is clearly unfit and Obama
decides not to continue.

3) Obama goes into a coma and does not get out of it.

The doctors say that he could wake up any time but after a few days,
then a week, then two weeks he remains in this coma.

4) Obama is assassinated.

41 Comments
Re: Obama is shot by a gunman         


Author: Graham
Date: Jun 15, 2008 04:34

"SolomonW" DONTBOTHER.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.22bf8c4ed7cde5d19897d8@news...
> Last week, I read that Obama has had federal protection since May of
> 2007. That is the earliest any presidential candidate have received such
> protection. Obviously they are worried.
>
> What happens if a gunman takes a shot at him and
>
> 1) Obama lives, reasons, speaks and decided to continue. However many
> feel that he is clearly medically unfit to run including some but not
> all of his doctors.
>
> 2) He lives, reasons and speak but is clearly unfit and Obama
> decides not to continue.
>
> 3) Obama goes into a coma and does not get out of it.
>
> The doctors say that he could wake up any time but after a few days,
> then a week, then two weeks he remains in this coma.
> ...
Show full article (1.36Kb)
no comments
Re: Obama is shot by a gunman         


Author: SolomonW
Date: Jun 15, 2008 06:02

In article <4854fe48_3@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com>,
graham.truesdale@tiscali.nospam.co.uk says...
> "SolomonW" DONTBOTHER.com> wrote in message
> news:MPG.22bf8c4ed7cde5d19897d8@news...
>> Last week, I read that Obama has had federal protection since May of
>> 2007. That is the earliest any presidential candidate have received such
>> protection. Obviously they are worried.
>>
>> What happens if a gunman takes a shot at him and
>>
>> 1) Obama lives, reasons, speaks and decided to continue. However many
>> feel that he is clearly medically unfit to run including some but not
>> all of his doctors.
>>
>> 2) He lives, reasons and speak but is clearly unfit and Obama
>> decides not to continue.
>>
>> 3) Obama goes into a coma and does not get out of it.
>>
>> The doctors say that he could wake up any time but after a few days, ...
Show full article (1.20Kb)
6 Comments
Re: Obama is shot by a gunman         


Author: Raymond Speer
Date: Jun 15, 2008 07:23

There is no Ban on Politics.

There was a cabal that assumed it was entitled to rule this group, and
they decreed that there would be no discussion of any subject that was
after the Disco Era. They then disgraced themselves intellectually by
being unable to agree as to what subjects were pre-, during and
post-disco.

It was incredible that the rudest, most disagreeable posters on the 'net
claimed they were saving SHWI from turmoil and discontent by attacking
anybody who posted stuff like: "What If the Clintons Had Passed A
Health Care System Through Congress."

I was always flabbergasted that swaggering bullies would flame people
who asked about prospects for modest social reform while the toughs were
promoting with impunity threads on extreme topics like thermonuclear
warfare or why they hate Fidel Castro. A few amateur Russ Limbaughs
still spew their bile, but not enough to worry about.

It is amusing. Our trollish counterparts don't make alt-historical
contributions and post only to exclaim how rotten SHWI now is because
they do not approve of SHWI's active members. Yet they appear out of the
woodwork to flame any entry that violates their shibboleths.
no comments
Re: Obama is shot by a gunman         


Author: Raymond Speer
Date: Jun 15, 2008 07:43

William Safire wrote a novel, Full Disclosure, in which a President was
injured and went blind. The man thought and communicated well, but he
could not see stuff.

Is that a disability that required the man to be replaced at his job?

Safire concludes that such judgments are intensely subjective. People
who don't like X to start with will think that the guy has to go, and
people who like X will rally behind him. And fair minded people will
note that everyone has good days and bad days, and incapacity is never
something that is set in stone.

Short of the politician being dead, everybody will have an opinion and
most of them will stink (if _they_ disagree with your own preference).
In the past, the tendency in America ( Garfield, Wilson, Reagan) is to
give the Prez the benefit of all doubts and keep patting him on the back
until he recovers.
Show full article (1.37Kb)
no comments
Re: Obama is shot by a gunman         


Author: Per Rønne
Date: Jun 15, 2008 08:40

Raymond Speer webtv.net> wrote:
> William Safire wrote a novel, Full Disclosure, in which a President was
> injured and went blind. The man thought and communicated well, but he
> could not see stuff.
>
> Is that a disability that required the man to be replaced at his job?
>
> Safire concludes that such judgments are intensely subjective. People
> who don't like X to start with will think that the guy has to go, and
> people who like X will rally behind him. And fair minded people will
> note that everyone has good days and bad days, and incapacity is never
> something that is set in stone.

Well, Romaioi tended to blind political enemies - to romove them from
politics.
Show full article (1.02Kb)
no comments
Re: Obama is shot by a gunman         


Author: Graham
Date: Jun 15, 2008 08:50

"Raymond Speer" webtv.net> wrote in message
news:5576-485525F5-667@storefull-3172.bay.webtv.net...
> There is no Ban on Politics.
> There was a cabal that assumed it was entitled to rule this group, and
> they decreed that there would be no discussion of any subject that was
> after the Disco Era. They then disgraced themselves intellectually by
> being unable to agree as to what subjects were pre-, during and
> post-disco.
>
By any definition, an assassination attempt on Obama would count as
post-Disco.
> It was incredible that the rudest, most disagreeable posters on the 'net
> claimed they were saving SHWI from turmoil and discontent by attacking
> anybody who posted stuff like: "What If the Clintons...
Show full article (1.94Kb)
2 Comments
Re: Obama is shot by a gunman         


Author: The Horny Goat
Date: Jun 15, 2008 13:19

On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 23:02:31 +1000, SolomonW DONTBOTHER.com>
wrote:
>>> Last week, I read that Obama has had federal protection since May of
>>> 2007. That is the earliest any presidential candidate have received such
>>> protection. Obviously they are worried.
>> ...
Show full article (1.94Kb)
no comments
No Bans on Subjects, was Obama is shot by a gunman         


Author: Raymond Speer
Date: Jun 15, 2008 19:12

Question: Does the Frequently Asked Questions introduction to SHWI
prohibit the discussion of recent subjects?

Answer: No.

Explanation: The FAQ explicitly states that there are "no enforceable
rules" on SHWI. That kind of says it all, doesn't it?

This is an unmoderated forum. People who preferred being told what to
think have long been able to go to Jim Baen's site or Allan
Montgomerie's site, where the rules are plentiful and the boss is
infallible.

This group used to be a playground for cyberbullies whose principal
activity was harassing everyone they disagreed with. And they invented
lots of rules, not one of which was ever presented for ratification by a
majority vote, and pounced on anyone who did not kowtow to their
majesty.
Show full article (2.36Kb)
no comments
Re: Obama is shot by a gunman         


Author: SolomonW
Date: Jun 16, 2008 05:04

In article <5576-48552A8B-669@storefull-3172.bay.webtv.net>,
raystwo@webtv.net says...
>
> William Safire wrote a novel, Full Disclosure, in which a President was
> injured and went blind. The man thought and communicated well, but he
> could not see stuff.
>
> Is that a disability that required the man to be replaced at his job?
>
> Safire concludes that such judgments are intensely subjective. People
> who don't like X to start with will think that the guy has to go, and
> people who like X will rally behind him. And fair minded people will
> note that everyone has good days and bad days, and incapacity is never
> something that is set in stone.
>
> Short of the politician being dead, everybody will have an opinion and
> most of them will stink (if _they_ disagree with your own preference).
> In the past, the tendency in America ( Garfield, Wilson, Reagan) is to
> give the Prez the benefit of all doubts and keep patting him on the back
> until he recovers. ...
Show full article (1.67Kb)
no comments

RELATED THREADS
SubjectArticles qty Group
Re: Obama this, Obama that, Obama the other...alt.atheism ·
Boy, FOX news sure is scared of Obama! And even more scared of an Obama/Clinton ticket!10 alt.politics.usa ·
1 2 3 4 5