Karunanithi is still with a HINDU name. No one knows his converted
MUSLIM name so far.

DRAVIDIAN culutre , I hope is not informative and worse than the
Brahmanical issues!

I still not get any reply from the DRAVIDA goons why M.Karunanithi,
whose original name was Dakshinamoorthy, in fear to come for a chat on
the legacy of DMK or DK!

I hope Stalin the son of Karunanithi may attack and rape TAMIL women
from the homes where Anti-Karunanithi Tamils live.

The casteist struggles in TN especially, are propagated not by the
Brahmins, but by the other 'upper caste'. Yet the Brahmins seem to be
the ones that are targetted. Very soon thre will be no brahmins in
TN...

On May 20, 1:12 am, ramanan1...@yahoo.com wrote:

I agree but why do this DMK use Brahmans as a HATE tool in thier
politics?

On May 20, 1:32 am, karthika wrote:

Colonisers Brits and muslims used this tactic of hatred against
Brahmins. They taught, like Tamils are taught by DMK et al, that
Hindusim is only for brahmins and they even invented a brahmanaical
Hinduism! You can see references to "brahmanaical Hindusim' by
European "scholars" and pseusointellectual Indian journalists. Thus
they cleverly sought to divide Hindus into minority brahmins and
others so they can convert and rule the whole of India making them
slaves. Since brahmins are the most orthodox of Hindus they attacked
them so they can demolish Hindus as a whole. If some one can isolate
brahmins and make them irrelevant and others lose respect for them,
then Hinduism is going to lose they thought.

Colonisation is still in vogue. We are not really free! Hindus should
rise.

Clever would you not think especially as it is working so far at least
in TN!

On May 20, 8:20 pm, uNmaiviLambi yahoo.com> wrote:

On May 21, 12:12 am, karthika wrote:

Brits used any one who could read and write to do their clerical
duties as coolies. All upper castes could read and write and were also
deprived of their normal earnings like royal patronages, hereditary
privileges all taken over by the Brits who donated many lands to
Christian missionaries and deprived temples from manyam( earnings).
Muslims di the same thing.Thus the so called upper castes had to go
for these jobs from Brits But almost all Hindus fought against Brits
fro freedom. Kamaraj's guru was Sathyamoorthy

Thus it was colonisation that led to problems for 1000 years. It is
not from within the Hindu fold

On May 21, 8:22 am, uNmaiviLambi yahoo.com> wrote:

On May 21, 9:12 am, karthika wrote:

On Jun 3, 5:50 am, ramanan1...@yahoo.com wrote:

On 3 Jun, 21:29, karthika wrote: