 Up |
  |
Author: Nomen NescioNomen Nescio
Date: May 31, 2007 21:50
"Arturo Alfonso Schomburg" collection.com> wrote in message news:z%%J7i.316305$ZA5.278845@newsfe15.phx...
>> your argument is comparing traffic to immigration law? indeed your stupidity and hipocrisy are amazing.
>
> You obviously are an uneducated person who has no critical thinking skills.
pulgarcito, remember you are the hypocrite comparing traffic to immigration law. besides, your argument lacks merit for critical thinking analysis
btw, my mom sends you her apology for almost stepping on you while walking down the hall of csu-lb
|
| |
|
1 Comment |
|
|
Author: Borked Pseudo MailedBorked Pseudo Mailed
Date: May 31, 2007 21:45
"Arturo Alfonso Schomburg" collection.com> wrote in message news:z%%J7i.316305$ZA5.278845@newsfe15.phx...
>> your argument is comparing traffic to immigration law? indeed your stupidity and hipocrisy are amazing.
>
> You obviously are an uneducated person who has no critical thinking skills.
pulgarcito, remember you are the hypocrite comparing traffic to immigration law. besides, your argument lacks merit for critical thinking analysis
btw, my mom sends you her apology for almost stepping on you while walking down the hall of csu-lb
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: Anonymous SenderAnonymous Sender
Date: May 31, 2007 21:33
"Arturo Alfonso Schomburg" collection.com> wrote in message news:z%%J7i.316305$ZA5.278845@newsfe15.phx...
>> your argument is comparing traffic to immigration law? indeed your stupidity and hipocrisy are amazing.
>
> You obviously are an uneducated person who has no critical thinking skills.
pulgarcito, remember you are the hypocrite comparing traffic to immigration law. besides, your argument lacks merit for critical thinking analysis
btw, my mom sends you her apology for almost stepping on you while walking down the hall of csu-lb
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Arturo Alfonso SchomburgArturo Alfonso Schomburg
Date: May 31, 2007 17:48
Matt Hungo wrote:
> On May 30, 4:31 pm, " krp" verizon.net> wrote:
>
> Even the FCC cannot just yank a license. If they wish to such actions
> MUST be reviewed by the courts.
>
> Esto no es cierto. Al vencimiento...
|
| Show full article (1.01Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: Matt HungoMatt Hungo
Date: May 31, 2007 16:39
On May 30, 4:31 pm, " krp" verizon.net> wrote:
Even the FCC cannot just yank a license. If they wish to such actions
MUST be reviewed by the courts.
Esto no es cierto. Al vencimiento de una licencia la FCC puede
renovarla o no sin ninguna intervención de otra instancia. Ocurrió la
situación recíproca hace poco cuando se trató de la renovación de la
licencia de KAZA en Los Angeles. LA FCC la renovó pero la cadena NBC
intentó acudir a la Corte para que se anulara la renovación. El juez
rechazó la demanda diciendo que renovar o no una licencia es una
decisión puramente administrativa de la FCC y que ninguna instancia
judicial puede opinar a favor o en contra salvo que se alegue una
actividad criminal conexa (por ej., que se haya pagado un soborno para
obtener la licencia).
Matt
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: Viejo VizcachaViejo Vizcacha
Date: May 31, 2007 15:29
On May 30, 11:28 pm, " krp" verizon.net> wrote:>>>> Una cosa muy particular es que ningun juzgado encontro a RCTV de
>>>> culpable,
>>>> negligente o responsable de ningun acto de sedicion, solo que no le
>>>> renovaron la licencia y listo. Esto por recomendacion directa del
>>>> Presidente Chavez. Aun en Cuba le hacen juicio a los Anti-castristas.
>>>> Es triste ver como funcionan las cosas en esos paises, pero ellos son
>>>> paises soberanos. Veo que el ciclo se esta repitiendo de nuevo,
>>>> Latinoamerica esta entrando nuevamente a la etapa del socialismo, esto
>>>> durara unos 20 anos aprox.... O hay que contar los primeros 10 de
>>>> Chavez... no se
>>>> Tan lindo que es Venezuela, pero fijate, me siento mas seguro en
>>>> Bogota,
>>>> que en Caracas. ...
|
| Show full article (3.05Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
