> On Oct 14, 1:27 pm, rst0wxyz yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>

>> On Oct 14, 1:14 pm, Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD

>

>> hotmail.com> wrote:

>>> On Oct 14, 10:55 am, rst0wxyz yahoo.com> wrote:

>

>>>> On Oct 14, 8:52 am, Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD

>

>>>> hotmail.com> wrote:

>>>>> On Oct 14, 8:18 am, rst0wxyz yahoo.com> wrote:

>

>>>>>> On Oct 14, 6:23 am, bob young netvigator.com> wrote:

>

>>>>>>> rst0wxyz wrote:

>>>>>>>> On Oct 13, 6:58 pm, bob young netvigator.com> wrote:

>>>>>>>>> rst0wxyz wrote:

>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 12, 9:24 am, bmo...@nyx.net wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 11, 6:31 pm, bob young netvigator.com> wrote:

>

>>>>>>>>>>>> Then do some home work and you will find that it is.

>

>>>>>>>>>>> OK, I'll believe you. So was it different laws for different races?
>>>>>>>>>>> How late in the game was that still the case, if I may ask?

>

>>>>>>>>>> The laws in Hong Kong were similar to the laws in the United States,

>

>>>>>>>>> Rubbish. HK Law is based on British law and even followed legal reforms
>>>>>>>>> in both countries as and when they applied.

>

>>>>>>>> And American law was based on British law. There may have been
>>>>>>>> changes, but both are still similar.

>

>>>>>>> Very true and as you say, the earlier law was british

>

>>>>>>>>>> they were the same for all people, except it was and still is control
>>>>>>>>>> by white people,

>

>>>>>>>>> More arrant blinkered racists rubbish.

>

>>>>>>>> "All men are created equal" is still not a reality today, not in
>>>>>>>> America, not in England. And you say this is racist rubbish?

>

>>>>>>>>> There are a few British
>>>>>>>>> magistrates and judges left the majority are now Chinese and the
>>>>>>>>> government minister in charge of legal matters is also Chinese.

>

>>>>>>>> The Chinese people had been racist bigots throughout Chinese history.
>>>>>>>> They were the "center of the world", remember? Even today, you see it
>>>>>>>> within SCC. The Chinese people discriminated against other Chinese.

>

>>>>>>> which has what, exactly, to do with the structure of HK Law that we were
>>>>>>> discussing?

>

>>>>>> You started out saying: "... the majority are now Chinese and the
>>>>>> government minister in charge of legal matters is also Chinese."

>

>>>>>> My response was: "The Chinese people had been racist bigots
>>>>>> throughout Chinese history. They were the "center of the world",
>>>>>> remember? Even today, you see it within SCC. The Chinese people
>>>>>> discriminated against other Chinese."

>

>>>>>> And the Chinese called the Western people "barbarians". They built
>>>>>> walls around their country to keep others out, and of course, to keep
>>>>>> Chinese people in. They refused to accept western technogies until
>>>>>> recently, when they realized they are way, way, way behind. Now,
>>>>>> Chinese students are all over the world, but most would not return to
>>>>>> China. They flee China at any cost.

>

>>>>>>>>>> with white prejudice and white man's way of life. In
>>>>>>>>>> pre-1997 Hong Kong, the laws were for the British, controlled by the
>>>>>>>>>> British, and of course Chinese life did not equal to a British life.

>

>>>>>>>>> So yuo think but you have obviously not studied the matter. You really
>>>>>>>>> are a racist bigot

>

>>>>>>>> No, on the contrary, I know it only too well.

>

>>>>>>> This ng should be changed to soc.culture.racism

>

>>>>>> Chinese people know very well about racism. It started out with the
>>>>>> British East India Company in the 1600s in India, and Lord Macartney
>>>>>> in QianLong's court, the American's internment of the American
>>>>>> Japanese during WWII, to today's treatment of the Iraqis and bullying
>>>>>> of Iran and North Korea. We all still feel the past humiliation, the
>>>>>> past treatment by foreigners occupying Chinese land, and the "no dog
>>>>>> or Chinese allowed" of the past. That is what I called racism of the
>>>>>> worst kind.

>

>>>>> you've been telling us along that you are american, resty, and now
>>>>> suddenly it's "we" when you're talking about the chinks. so, what do
>>>>> you want us to call you? yank or chink? chinky yank or yanky chink?

>

>>>> dr ira, you're an educated man. "we" is a common pronoun everybody
>>>> can use for any and all purposes. It just make the sentence complete.

>

>>> lol ! so you just shift from one side to the other according to your
>>> convenience, huh, resty?

>

>> Didn't you read my profile, dr ira? I philosophize on what it was or
>> is and what it should be. Life is not perfect.

>
> profile? bwahahaha ! what I read of your psychological profile is that
> you are passing your time as a troll answering posts that you often
> know very little about, and you think it's fun.

> that is not
> philosophizing ! when it comes to choosing sides, you take the one
> that is most convenient,

> but at least you're not like that paki homo
> rak. now him we know to be a liar.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -