http://www.zaobao.com/special/realtime/2006/11/061101_17.html

女佣潜病房偷拍肥肥　被判坐牢4周

--------------------

It is surprising because entertainment celebrities primarily sell their
image
for a living. Of course, they are still artists. But their artistry is
closely
connected to their image. Many also manipulate the media to project a
different
image at different time to gain fans.

A maid of the hospital taking a picture is inherently no different from
the hospital
having a monitor. To be sure, the maid could be and should be fired
for violation
hospital rule. Why is the compelling government interest to prosecute
her?

ltlee1 wrote:

McDonalds sell hamburgers. But you can't go steal a McDonalds
hamburger. Celebrities own their images. When you steal it it's
theft.

PeterL wrote:

ltlee1 wrote:

PeterL wrote:

ltlee1 wrote:

Yes that would be nonsense because you are not an employee of the
hospital. Higher standards are applied to employees, even the lowest
level of employees.

ltlee1 wrote:

I don't know about HK Law on this matter, but the comparison between
a monitor and the photo is invalid. The patient gives up some
privacy and allows himself to be monitored so that he can receive
the proper medical treatment. He does not gives up his privacy and
allows to be photographed so that the maid can have a show-and-
tell.

PeterL wrote:

Tak To wrote:

ltlee1 wrote: