|
|
Up |
|
|
  |
Author: chatnoirchatnoir Date: Apr 4, 2008 18:10
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2008/04/05/do0504.xml
We should subject China to an Olympic boycott
By Sam Leith
Last Updated: 12:01am BST 05/04/2008s
Vladimir Lenin framed the fundamental question in politics as Kto
kovo?, or in English "Who whom?" It is a question that frames
political power in grammar. Who is nominative, and whom is accusative;
who is subject and whom is object; who controls the verb and whom gets
the verb in the jacksie.
It was stylishly - albeit ungrammatically - restated by Aretha
Franklin in the title of her 1985 album Who's Zoomin' Who?
And it has found new expression in China with the summary jailing for
three and a half years of the 34-year-old human rights activist Hu
Jia. Hu whom? Given that the Chinese leader shares a surname with the
dissident, we could even recast Aretha: Hu's zoomin' Hu.
|
| Show full article (4.89Kb) |
|
| | 11 Comments |
|
  |
Author: ltlee1ltlee1 Date: Apr 5, 2008 08:44
On Apr 4, 8:10 pm, chatnoir mindspring.com> wrote:
> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2008/04/05...
>
> We should subject China to an Olympic boycott
> By Sam Leith
> Last Updated: 12:01am BST 05/04/2008s
>
> Vladimir Lenin framed the fundamental question in politics as Kto
> kovo?, or in English "Who whom?" It is a question that frames
> political power in grammar. Who is nominative, and whom is accusative;
> who is subject and whom is object; who controls the verb and whom gets
> the verb in the jacksie.
>
> It was stylishly - albeit ungrammatically - restated by Aretha
> Franklin in the title of her 1985 album Who's Zoomin' Who?
>
> And it has found new expression in China with the summary jailing for
> three and a half years of the 34-year-old human rights activist Hu
> Jia. Hu whom? Given that the Chinese leader shares a surname with the
> dissident, we could even recast Aretha: Hu's zoomin' Hu. ...
|
| Show full article (5.80Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
  |
Author: chatnoirchatnoir Date: Apr 5, 2008 08:49
On Apr 5, 9:44 am, "ltl...@ hotmail.com" hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 4, 8:10 pm, chatnoir mindspring.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>> We should subject China to an Olympic boycott
>> By Sam Leith
>> Last Updated: 12:01am BST 05/04/2008s
>
>> Vladimir Lenin framed the fundamental question in politics as Kto
>> kovo?, or in English "Who whom?" It is a question that frames
>> political power in grammar. Who is nominative, and whom is accusative;
>> who is subject and whom is object; who controls the verb and whom gets
>> the verb in the jacksie.
>
>> It was stylishly - albeit ungrammatically - restated by Aretha
>> Franklin in the title of her 1985 album Who's Zoomin' Who?
> ...
|
| Show full article (6.09Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: ltlee1ltlee1 Date: Apr 5, 2008 09:00
On Apr 5, 10:49 am, chatnoir mindspring.com> wrote:
> On Apr 5, 9:44 am, "ltl...@ hotmail.com" hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>> On Apr 4, 8:10 pm, chatnoir mindspring.com> wrote:
>
>
>>> We should subject China to an Olympic boycott
>>> By Sam Leith
>>> Last Updated: 12:01am BST 05/04/2008s
>
>>> Vladimir Lenin framed the fundamental question in politics as Kto
>>> kovo?, or in English "Who whom?" It is a question that frames
>>> political power in grammar. Who is nominative, and whom is accusative;
>>> who is subject and whom is object; who controls the verb and whom gets
>>> the verb in the jacksie. ...
|
| Show full article (6.80Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: ¬Û¹« Micky Wong¬Û¹« Micky Wong Date: Apr 5, 2008 09:45
On 4月5日, 下午12時00分, "ltl...@ hotmail.com" hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 5, 10:49 am, chatnoir mindspring.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Apr 5, 9:44 am, "ltl...@ hotmail.com" hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> On Apr 4, 8:10 pm, chatnoir mindspring.com> wrote:
>
>
>>>> We should subject China to an Olympic boycott
>>>> By Sam Leith
>>>> Last Updated: 12:01am BST 05/04/2008s
>
>>>> Vladimir Lenin framed the fundamental question in politics as Kto
>>>> kovo?, or in English "Who whom?" It is a question that frames
>>>> political power in grammar. Who is nominative, and whom is accusative;
>>>> who is subject and whom is object; who controls the verb and whom gets
>>>> the verb in the jacksie. ...
|
| Show full article (7.44Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: rst0wxyzrst0wxyz Date: Apr 5, 2008 11:17
On Apr 5, 9:45 am, 相鼠 Micky Wong rogers.com> wrote:
> On 4月5日, 下午12時00分, "ltl...@ hotmail.com" hotmail.com> wrote:
> IMHO, The Han Chinese are the foreign devils in the eyes of many
> minorities, this is exactly why the foreign devil Chinese government
> is using cruel and brutal force of suppression and killing to
> preventing anyone from speaking out the truth, this is why the foreign
> devil Chinese government has kicked out all journalists of the free
> media and sealed off Tibet.
Well, what do you know? Wacky Wrong came out from his hiding in a
cave to respond. Maybe the CIA gives him extra money to do this.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: xixi Date: Apr 5, 2008 11:38
Poor Micky, he did a real effort. Although we do not share his
comments, he deserves an smile for his effort.
Well done, Micky.
:)
On Apr 5, 8:17 pm, rst0wxyz yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Apr 5, 9:45 am, 相鼠 Micky Wong rogers.com> wrote:
>
>> On 4月5日, 下午12時00分, "ltl...@ hotmail.com" hotmail.com> wrote:
>> IMHO, The Han Chinese are the foreign devils in the eyes of many
>> minorities, this is exactly why the foreign devil Chinese government
>> is using cruel and brutal force of suppression and killing to
>> preventing anyone from speaking out the truth, this is why the foreign
>> devil Chinese government has kicked out all journalists of the free
>> media and sealed off Tibet.
>
> Well, what do you know? Wacky Wrong came out from his hiding in a
> cave to respond. Maybe the CIA gives him extra money to do this.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: rst0wxyzrst0wxyz Date: Apr 5, 2008 12:01
On Apr 5, 11:38 am, xi gmail.com> wrote:
> Poor Micky, he did a real effort. Although we do not share his
> comments, he deserves an smile for his effort.
No, Wacky Wrong does not deserve any smile, but a whipping. He's a
CIA running dog doing all CIA's dirty work.
>
> Well done, Micky.
Take him out to the nearest tree and hang him.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MDIra IRa IRA Humperdink MD Date: Apr 5, 2008 16:45
On Apr 5, 2:17 pm, rst0wxyz yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Apr 5, 9:45 am, 相鼠 Micky Wong rogers.com> wrote:
>
>> On 4月5日, 下午12時00分, "ltl...@ hotmail.com" hotmail.com> wrote:
>> IMHO, The Han Chinese are the foreign devils in the eyes of many
>> minorities, this is exactly why the foreign devil Chinese government
>> is using cruel and brutal force of suppression and killing to
>> preventing anyone from speaking out the truth, this is why the foreign
>> devil Chinese government has kicked out all journalists of the free
>> media and sealed off Tibet.
>
> Well, what do you know? Wacky Wrong came out from his hiding in a
> cave to respond. Maybe the CIA gives him extra money to do this.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: chatnoirchatnoir Date: Apr 5, 2008 20:22
On Apr 5, 1:01 pm, rst0wxyz yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Apr 5, 11:38 am, xi gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Poor Micky, he did a real effort. Although we do not share his
>> comments, he deserves an smile for his effort.
>
> No, Wacky Wrong does not deserve any smile, but a whipping. He's a
> CIA running dog doing all CIA's dirty work.
>
>
>
>> Well done, Micky.
>
> Take him out to the nearest tree and hang him.
That is your way!
|
| |
| no comments |
|
RELATED THREADS |
  |
|
|
|
|
|