The Portraits of Les Miserables of an "Olympic Host" -- In Chinese factories, lost fingers and low pay
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
soc.culture.hongkong only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
The Portraits of Les Miserables of an "Olympic Host" -- In Chinese factories, lost fingers and low pay         

Group: soc.culture.hongkong · Group Profile
Author: Micky Wong
Date: Jan 5, 2008 07:57

The Portraits of Les Miserables of an "Olympic Host" -- In Chinese
factories, lost fingers and low pay

International Herald Tribune

http://www.iht.com/bin/printfriendly.php?id=9031450

In Chinese factories, lost fingers and low pay

By David Barboza
Saturday, January 5, 2008

GUANGZHOU, China: Nearly a decade after some of the most powerful
companies in the world ― often under considerable criticism and consumer
pressure ― began an effort to eliminate sweatshop labor conditions in
Asia, worker abuse is still commonplace in many of the Chinese factories
that supply Western companies, according to labor rights groups.

The groups say some Chinese companies routinely shortchange their
employees on wages, withhold health benefits and expose their workers to
dangerous machinery and harmful chemicals, like lead, cadmium and mercury.

"If these things are so dangerous for the consumer, then how about the
workers?" said Anita Chan, a labor rights advocate who teaches at the
Australian National University. "We may be dealing with these things for
a short time, but they deal with them every day."

And so while American and European consumers worry about exposing their
children to Chinese-made toys coated in lead, Chinese workers, often as
young as 16, face far more serious hazards. Here in the Pearl River
Delta region near Hong Kong, for example, factory workers lose or break
about 40,000 fingers on the job every year, according to a study
published a few years ago by the Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences.

Pushing to keep big corporations honest, labor groups regularly smuggle
photographs, videos, pay stubs, shipping records and other evidence out
of factories that they say violate local law and international worker
standards.

In 2007, factories that supplied more than a dozen corporations,
including Wal-Mart, Disney and Dell, were accused of unfair labor
practices, including using child labor, forcing employees to work
16-hour days on fast-moving assembly lines, and paying workers less than
minimum wage. (Minimum wage in this part of China is about 55 cents an
hour.)

In recent weeks, a flood of reports detailing labor abuse have been
released, at a time when China is still coping with last year's wave of
made-in-China product safety recalls, and as it tries to change
workplace rules with a new labor law that took effect on Jan. 1.

No company has come under as harsh a spotlight as Wal-Mart, the world's
biggest retailer, which sourced about $9 billion in goods from China in
2006, everything from hammers and toys to high-definition televisions.

In December, two nongovernmental organizations, or NGO's, documented
what they said were abuse and labor violations at 15 factories that
produce or supply goods for Wal-Mart ― including the use of child labor
at Huanya Gifts, a factory here in Guangzhou that makes Christmas tree
ornaments.

Wal-Mart officials say they are investigating the allegations, which
were in a report issued three weeks ago by the National Labor Committee,
a New York-based NGO.

Guangzhou labor bureau officials say they recently fined Huanya for wage
violations, but officials say they found no evidence of child labor.

A spokesman for Huanya, which employs 8,000 workers, denied that the
company broke any labor laws.

But two workers interviewed outside Huanya's huge complex in late
December said that they were forced to work long hours to meet
production quotas in harsh conditions.

"I work on the plastic molding machine from 6 in the morning to 6 at
night," said Xu Wenquan, a tiny, baby-faced 16-year-old whose hands were
covered with blisters. Asked what had happened to his hands, he replied,
the machines are "quite hot, so I've burned my hands."

His brother, Xu Wenjie, 18, said the two young men left their small
village in impoverished Guizhou Province four months ago and traveled
more than 500 miles to find work at Huanya.

The brothers said they worked 12 hours a day, six days a week, for $120
to $200 a month, far less than they are required to be paid by law.

When government inspectors visit the factory, the young brothers are
given the day off, they said.

A former Huanya employee who was reached by telephone gave a similar
account of working conditions, saying many workers suffered from skin
rashes after working with gold powders and that others were forced to
sign papers "volunteering" to work overtime.

"It's quite noisy, and you stand up all day, 12 hours, and there's no
air-conditioning," he said. "We get paid by the piece we make but they
never told us how much. Sometimes I got $110, sometimes I got $150 a month."

In its 58-page report, the National Labor Committee scolded Wal-Mart for
not doing more to protect workers. The group charged that last July,
Huanya recruited about 500 16-year-old high school students to work
seven days a week, often 15 hours a day, during peak production months
for holiday merchandise.

Several students interviewed at the Guangzhou Technical School, less
than two miles from Huanya, confirmed that classmates ages 16 to 18 had
spent the summer working at the factory.

Some high school students later went on strike to protest the harsh
conditions, the report said. The students also told labor officials that
at least seven children, as young as 12 years old, were working in the
factory.

"At Wal-Mart, Christmas ornaments are cheap, and so are the lives of the
young workers in China who make them," the National Labor Committee
report said.

Jonathan Dong, a Wal-Mart spokesman in Beijing, said the company would
soon release details of its own investigation into working conditions at
Huanya.

Disney and Dell have also been criticized by labor rights groups.
Officials of Disney and Dell declined to comment on specific
allegations, but both companies said they carefully monitor factories in
China and take action when they find problems or unfair labor practices.

"The Walt Disney Company and its affiliates take claims of unfair labor
practices very seriously and investigates any such allegations
thoroughly," the company said in a statement. "We have a strong
commitment to the safety and well-being of workers, and fair and just
labor standards."

Many multinationals were harshly criticized in the 1990s for using
suppliers that maintained sweatshop conditions. Iconic brand names, like
Nike, Mattel and Gap responded by forming corporate social
responsibility operations and working with contractors to create a
system of factory audits and inspections. Those changes have won praise
in some quarters for improving worker conditions.

But despite spending millions of dollars and hiring thousands of
auditors, some companies admit many of the programs are flawed.

"The factories have improved immeasurably over the past few years," says
Alan Hassenfeld, chairman of the toy maker Hasbro and co-chairman of
Care, the ethical-manufacturing program of the International Council of
Toy Industries. "But let me be honest: there are some bad factories. We
have bribery and corruption occurring but we are doing our best."

Some factories are warned about audits beforehand and some factory
owners or managers bribe auditors. Inexperienced inspectors may also be
a problem.

Some major Western auditing firms working in China even hire college
students from the United States to work during the summer as inspectors,
an indication that they are not willing to invest in more expensive or
sophisticated auditing programs, critics say.

Chinese suppliers regularly outsource to other suppliers, who may in
turn outsource to yet another operation, creating a supply chain that is
hard to follow ― let alone inspect.

"The convoluted supply chain is probably one of the most underestimated
and unrecognized risks in China," says Dane Chamorro, general manager
for Greater China at Control Risks, a risk-consulting firm. "You really
have to have experienced people on the ground who know what they're
doing and know the language."

Many labor experts say part of the problem is cost: Western companies
are constantly pressing their Chinese suppliers for lower prices while
also insisting that factory owners spend more to upgrade operations,
treat workers properly and improve product quality.

At the same time, rising food, energy and raw material costs in China ―
as well as a shortage of labor in the biggest southern manufacturing
zones ― are hampering factory owners' ability to make a profit.

The situation may get worse before it improves. The labor law that took
effect on Jan. 1 makes it more difficult to dismiss workers and creates
a whole new set of laws that experts say will almost certainly increase
labor costs. Yet it may become more difficult for human rights groups to
investigate abuses. Concerned about the growing array of threats to
profitability, as well as embarrassing exposés, factories are
heightening security, harassing labor rights groups and calling the
police when journalists show up at their gates.

At the center of the problem is a labor system that relies on young
migrant workers, who often leave small rural villages for two- or
three-year stints at factories, where they hope to earn enough to return
home to start families.

As long as life in the cities promises more money than in rural areas,
they will brave the harsh conditions in factories in this and other
Chinese cities. And as long as China outlaws independent unions and
proves unable to enforce its own labor rules, there is little hope for
change.

"This is a problem that has been difficult to solve," said Liu Kaiming,
the director of the Institute on Contemporary Observation, which aids
migrant workers in nearby Shenzhen, of sweatshop labor. "China has too
many factories. The workers' bargaining position is weak and the
government's regulation is slack."

There is little that any Western company can do about those issues, no
matter how seriously they take corporate social responsibility ― other
than leaving China.

http://www.iht.com/bin/printfriendly.php?id=9031450
no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!