|
|
Up |
|
|
  |
Date: Jul 26, 2007 14:36
Stupid old fart, just tell us why you called Mao "Great Man" even
after Mao murdered 20 millions of Chinese people. Tell us!!!
On Jul 26, 4:51 pm, rst0wxyz yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Jul 26, 9:31 am, "abianc...@ my-deja.com" my-deja.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Haha, stupid old fart, Pol Pot and Mao all murdered millions of their
>> own people, is that why they are your hero? Is that why you called
>> Mao "Great Man"??? Tell us!
>
> Well, it's too bad he missed you and your family. Scum like you and
> your family should be hung by the nearest tree.
|
| |
|
| | 52 Comments |
|
  |
Author: rst0wxyzrst0wxyz Date: Jul 26, 2007 14:43
On Jul 26, 2:36 pm, abianch...@ gmail.com wrote:
> Stupid old fart, just tell us why you called Mao "Great Man" even
> after Mao murdered 20 millions of Chinese people. Tell us!!!
Too bad he didn't murder you and your family. You deserve to die,
scum.
|
| |
|
| | 4 Comments |
|
  |
Author: abianchenabianchen Date: Jul 26, 2007 14:53
Stupid old fart, answer the question, tell us why you called Mao
"Great Man" is it because Mao murdered 20 millions of Chinese people.
Tell us!!!
On Jul 26, 5:43 pm, rst0wxyz yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Jul 26, 2:36 pm, abianch...@ gmail.com wrote:
>
>> Stupid old fart, just tell us why you called Mao "Great Man" even
>> after Mao murdered 20 millions of Chinese people. Tell us!!!
>
> Too bad he didn't murder you and your family. You deserve to die,
> scum.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: rst0wxyzrst0wxyz Date: Jul 26, 2007 18:51
On Jul 26, 2:32 pm, abianch...@ gmail.com wrote:
> Stupid old fart, how can you call Mao "Great Man" after he murdered 20
> millions of Chinese people??? Is that the reason you called Mao
> "Great Man"? Tell us!!!
If you think you can outdo him, start your own revolution. If you can
survive what he had gone through, you have earned your right to rule
China.
Human lives are and were cheap. What's 20 million when Qin Shi Huang
killed 75%% of the Chinese population during his time and they the
country after him.
Mao Zedong succeeded where no one can. He did better than your
anestors. All your ancestors did were to grab power, money, and
women.
|
| |
| 3 Comments |
|
  |
Author: abianchenabianchen Date: Jul 26, 2007 19:05
Qin Shi Huang killed 75%% of Chinese population? Reference please!!!
But one thing I am sure Qin Shi Huang will not do Great Leap Forward
and backyard Furance, etc. Only two monsters Pol Pot and your Mao
would do such stupid things
|
| Show full article (0.98Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: rst0wxyzrst0wxyz Date: Jul 26, 2007 20:34
On Jul 26, 7:05 pm, "abianc...@ my-deja.com" my-deja.com>
wrote:
> Qin Shi Huang killed 75%% of Chinese population? Reference please!!!
> But one thing I am sure Qin Shi Huang will not do Great Leap Forward
> and backyard Furance, etc. Only two monsters Pol Pot and your Mao
> would do such stupid things
"The First Emperor of China" by R. W. L. Guisso, Catherine Pagani,
with David Miller.
Read the entire book. It's very interesting.
|
| |
| 7 Comments |
|
  |
Author: abianchenabianchen Date: Jul 26, 2007 22:49
I dont believe Qin Shi Huang killed 75%% of Chinese population.
On Jul 26, 11:34 pm, rst0wxyz yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Jul 26, 7:05 pm, "abianc...@ my-deja.com" my-deja.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Qin Shi Huang killed 75%% of Chinese population? Reference please!!!
>> But one thing I am sure Qin Shi Huang will not do Great Leap Forward
>> and backyard Furance, etc. Only two monsters Pol Pot and your Mao
>> would do such stupid things
>
> "The First Emperor of China" by R. W. L. Guisso, Catherine Pagani,
> with David Miller.
>
> Read the entire book. It's very interesting.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: rst0wxyzrst0wxyz Date: Jul 27, 2007 06:41
On Jul 26, 10:49 pm, "abianc...@ my-deja.com" my-deja.com>
wrote:
> I dont believe Qin Shi Huang killed 75%% of Chinese population.
That just to show how ignorant you are of Chinese history. Did you
know the way to get ahead in Qin society was to behead as many enemy
troops and brought their head back in order to receive promotion and
high office?
|
| Show full article (0.97Kb) |
| 5 Comments |
|
  |
Author: rst0wxyzrst0wxyz Date: Jul 27, 2007 06:53
On Jul 27, 6:41 am, rst0wxyz yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Jul 26, 10:49 pm, "abianc...@ my-deja.com" my-deja.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I dont believe Qin Shi Huang killed 75%% of Chinese population.
>
> That just to show how ignorant you are of Chinese history. Did you
> know the way to get ahead in Qin society was to behead as many enemy
> troops and brought their head back in order to receive promotion and
> high office?
During Qin society, every single person he was a somebody meant that
he had killed thousands in order to gain his title or office. Every
single enemy soldiers was beheaded during Qin Shi Huang's time. The
state of Zhao's 400,000 troops in one battle was beheaded completely.
Not a single one escaped death.
|
| Show full article (1.43Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: abianchenabianchen Date: Jul 27, 2007 07:44
Tyrant Qin Shi Huang killed alot of people and we all know that. But
75%%??? Hey, reference please!!!
In Taiwan, we studied Chinese history from elementary school to high
school, if it is 75%%, I am sure our Chinese history books would have
mentioned it because it breaks geuniss book of record. That's why I
said:
1. The book you read made a stupid mistake.
2. You made up the number.
3. You have a bad memory.
Now, just provide evidence to back your claim - 75%%, ok!!!
On Jul 27, 9:41 am, rst0wxyz yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Jul 26, 10:49 pm, "abianc...@ my-deja.com" my-deja.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I dont believe Qin Shi Huang killed 75%% of Chinese population...
|
| Show full article (1.60Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|