Re: Propensity to violence and liberty Re: "Rule of Law" with Chinese Characteristics: Beijing's Rule of Law Retreat/The Wall Street Journal
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
soc.culture.hongkong only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: Propensity to violence and liberty Re: "Rule of Law" with Chinese Characteristics: Beijing's Rule of Law Retreat/The Wall Street Journal         

Group: soc.culture.hongkong · Group Profile
Author: Micky Wong -
Date: Jul 6, 2007 12:18

Repeated shouting of "nonsense" do not make your argument more
convincing.
It is similar to raise your voice in public, which BTW is yet another
strong trait of Chinese inferiority. ;-) ;-)

American's can trace their roots on the land of today's USA back about
400 years. The earliest British settlement at Jamestown was first
established 1607. The relationship between new settler and local
natives was not one sided as you imagined or described in China's
history books. If you have interest to know more about the history of
North America, there is a book named "Chesapeake"by James A.
Michener, recent movies such as "Apocalypto" (2006, by Mel Gibson) or
"The Missing" (2003 Canadian Production starred by Cate Blanchett and
Tommy Lee Jones ) as a starter for reference. There was atrocities
committed by both sides.

As for what happened in Canada, I have a personal story of revelation:
The year of 1962, on the eve of my departing from China, I found the
Chinese translation of a book written by a Czechoslovakian writer (I
was unable to trace his name since) in a used book store in
Shanghai , The story's background is the war between English settler
and French settler in earlier Canada; Both sides had allies of
different native tribes. The books name in Chinese translation was
"Blue Bird" " " The main subject was a native boy who was captured
and adopted by an English family. The story carries a communism
revolutionary tone of how the native boy resisted the kindness of his
adopting family for many years and successfully escaped and returned
to his native tribe. What I find in my reading was, how kind the
English family was in treating the native boy, it is totally different
from what I was taught in school about the Europeans imperialist
enemy. My later experience in Canada proved my first impression
learned from this book was the truth. What Chinese history book
taught me then was a bunch of lies. And the name "blue bird" or "blue
Jay" happens to be one of the popular native bird specie s in Canada.

Seeing your propensity of bloodshed, May I ask: How many Chinese had
been slaughtered by Chinese in the last 50 years? How many minority
had been slaughtered by Chinese in the last 300 years? 100 years? 50
years? Does Chinese has the right to accuse others for earlier
atrocities ?

To most European or North Americans, Colonization is and was a shame
of the past. To Chinese, colonization of Tibet and Turkestan are still
considered patriotic. Who are the true barbarians? Who are the 21st
century criminal ?!

I say: China's colonization in 21st century is a great shame to
humanity!

Skilled in focusing on the fault of others but unable and unwilling to
stop it's own sin is yet another shameless characteristics with
Chinese inferiority.

ltlee1@hotmail.com wrote:
> On Jul 6, 1:08 pm, Micky Wong - rogers.com> wrote:
>> Do you need help to understand my Chinglish? I said "most of British
>> colony achieved independence without bloodshed. "
>
> Absolutely nonsense.
> The biggest prize is USA. And it achieved independence through
> bllodshed.
> In the case of Australia, the Brits had more or less extermiante the
> natives.
> Hence a white Australis ia not exactly the same kind of colony like
> India. BTW,
> the currency of Canada as well as Australia still feature the queen.
> In commemoration of bloodshed in the name of the British Monarch?
>
>
>>
>> FYI, one of the exception of those British colony which failed to
>> gain independence (against local residents will) is Hong Kong. This is
>> due to Hong Kong's proximity of China, which is under the grip of CCP
>> tyranny.
>>
>> On Jul 6, 12:47 pm, rst0wxyz yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Jul 6, 5:51 am, Micky Wong - rogers.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> Please check your history book to verify these facts:
>>
>>>> China like to view itself as the victim of foreign aggression, but
>>>> take a close look at Chinese history,
>>>> 1/3 to 1/2 of China's territory today was obtained by invading
>>>> neighboring nations is the last 300 years.
>>
>>>> In sharp contrast, British Empire at the late 1800s, occupied a area
>>>> of land amount to 35 million Sq. KM, in less than 30 years after 2nd
>>>> world war, most of British colony achieved independence without
>>>> bloodshed.
>>
>>> The blood ran thicker and redder than you know, Micky Wong. England
>>> promised independence to India if they help during WWII. After WWII,
>>> England tried to regain their power in India. India used Gandha's
>>> principle of non-violence. The English killed unarmed Indians by the
>>> tens of thousands before they realized they can not kill them all and
>>> gave in.
>>
>>> As you saw in Vietnam, the French also wanted to regain their power in
>>> Indochina and the U.S. was helping France to suppress the Vietnamese.
>>> The result was the Vietnam War for the U.S.
>>
>>>> Today's English people of UK still enjoys a living
>>>> standard at the top of the world on an area less than 250,000 Sq. KM
>>>> less than one percent of the old British Empire.
>>
>>> Are you kidding? The UK is the toy poodle of George Bush.
>>
>>>> After Chinese becoming China's own master over 90 years, Chinese are
>>>> still bemoaning the pain of foreign aggression, this is a severe case
>>>> of psychopath in grand scale. This is real and present danger of
>>>> China threat to the world.
>>
>>> And you are part of this Grand scale threat to China with the falun
>>> gong.
>>
>>>> On Jul 6, 5:40 am, "ltl...@hotmail.com" hotmail.com> wrote:- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!