On Jul 5, 10:03 am, Micky Wong wrote:

You are ignorant.

"Political power comes from the gun barrel" has no yesterday and
today.
It is true yesterday. It is true today and it will be true tomorrow.
What you
envision as "propensity to violence" is the only God given right. It
is the
inalienable right. It is the alpha and omega of human rights.

Please check your history book to verify these facts:

China like to view itself as the victim of foreign aggression, but
take a close look at Chinese history,
1/3 to 1/2 of China's territory today was obtained by invading
neighboring nations is the last 300 years.

In sharp contrast, British Empire at the late 1800s, occupied a area
of land amount to 35 million Sq. KM, in less than 30 years after 2nd
world war, most of British colony achieved independence without
bloodshed. Today's English people of UK still enjoys a living
standard at the top of the world on an area less than 250,000 Sq. KM
less than one percent of the old British Empire.

After Chinese becoming China's own master over 90 years, Chinese are
still bemoaning the pain of foreign aggression, this is a severe case
of psychopath in grand scale. This is real and present danger of
China threat to the world.

On Jul 6, 5:40 am, "ltl...@hotmail.com" hotmail.com> wrote:

On Jul 6, 5:51 am, Micky Wong - rogers.com> wrote:

The blood ran thicker and redder than you know, Micky Wong. England
promised independence to India if they help during WWII. After WWII,
England tried to regain their power in India. India used Gandha's
principle of non-violence. The English killed unarmed Indians by the
tens of thousands before they realized they can not kill them all and
gave in.

Do you need help to understand my Chinglish? I said "most of British
colony achieved independence without bloodshed. "

FYI, one of the exception of those British colony which failed to
gain independence (against local residents will) is Hong Kong. This is
due to Hong Kong's proximity of China, which is under the grip of CCP
tyranny.

On Jul 6, 12:47 pm, rst0wxyz yahoo.com> wrote:

On Jul 6, 1:08 pm, Micky Wong - rogers.com> wrote:

Absolutely nonsense.
The biggest prize is USA. And it achieved independence through
bllodshed.
In the case of Australia, the Brits had more or less extermiante the
natives.
Hence a white Australis ia not exactly the same kind of colony like
India. BTW,
the currency of Canada as well as Australia still feature the queen.
In commemoration of bloodshed in the name of the British Monarch?

Repeated shouting of "nonsense" do not make your argument more
convincing.
It is similar to raise your voice in public, which BTW is yet another
strong trait of Chinese inferiority. ;-) ;-)

American's can trace their roots on the land of today's USA back about
400 years. The earliest British settlement at Jamestown was first
established 1607. The relationship between new settler and local
natives was not one sided as you imagined or described in China's
history books. If you have interest to know more about the history of
North America, there is a book named "Chesapeake"by James A.
Michener, recent movies such as "Apocalypto" (2006, by Mel Gibson) or
"The Missing" (2003 Canadian Production starred by Cate Blanchett and
Tommy Lee Jones ) as a starter for reference. There was atrocities
committed by both sides.

As for what happened in Canada, I have a personal story of revelation:
The year of 1962, on the eve of my departing from China, I found the
Chinese translation of a book written by a Czechoslovakian writer...

On Jul 6, 10:08 am, Micky Wong - rogers.com> wrote:

Yeah, yeah, yeah, This "most of British colonies" were mostly white,
like Canada, Australia,... I gotcha.

You know very well Hong Kong can not be independent in any way. Hong
Kong depends on China for all its surrvival, most water, food, raw
materials,...

Instead of working against China, you and the falun gong should work
with China to speed-up the development of China and the Chinese
people's livelihood.

Ok my kind of talk Lieutenant Lee,

What kind of gun are we talking about?

I have in my collection: all made or modified in China

1. Takarov Chicom
2. Markarov Chicom
3. Type 56 AK47
4. SKS paratrooper
5. SKS spike bayonet 1952 factory 56 Beijing
6. HBAR long barreled AK47 Chicom + 100 round drums
7. TU-90
8. Modified Broom handle Mauser
9 Modified Arisaka type 99 Chicom 1939
10 Chicom AK47 paramodel
11. RPK belt fed Chicom Vietnamese

Which one should I use to insure my freedom when the negroes rise up or
terrorist attack us?

hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1183714810.603578.198190@n2g2000hse.googlegroups.com...