On Jul 29, 5:45Â pm, ltlee1
hotmail.com> wrote:> On Jul 29, 7:40Â pm, "AleXX" wrote:
>
>> Finally, the no hair bird uses his typical word "garbage" against you !
>
> Miay be Baldeage is right.
>
> Basically, the famine lasted for three years. It is one thing to blame
> bad policy for a short lived event. It is difficult to pin the famine
> to policy for three years.
LT doesn't care how much shit he spews or if there is even a shred of
logic in what he says. LT gets his panties in a bunch if anyone blames
Chairman Mao for anything bad. So he'll say anything, anyhow. He tries
to make it sound vaguely logical, but if he's out of steam he will,
and has, just said anything, without regard to any rational train of
thought.
In other words, LT will not accept any facts that suggest Mao was a
bad man, and the reason is because he cannot possibly be. Just
because.
This joker has the gall to insist that we use "facts and logic" while
he pays no attention to his own edict.
> For example, let us say the deep plowing
> and the concentrated planting method were bogus. It would fool the
> farmers for one year. But for thrree years? The same reeason applis to
> governmental abuse. The farmers might be willing to send in more food
> for one year despite the fact that they did not have enough for
> themselves. But for the second year and the third years after they had
> suffered? Were the people really that dumb?
>
> Undernutrition and malnutrition could last for decades under a
> capitalistic system.
Ah, so LT is saying that the GLF debacle could only have happened in a
capitalistic country, not China. yet it *did* happen in China. Another
inconvenient truth, eh LT?
> Because the determining factor is not the
> availability of food but the availabiity of money to buy the food. It
> is a problem in distribution. In this case, one can link
> undernutrition and malnutrition to policy such as cut back in welfare.
> But China's case is more a production problem and due to natural
> causes.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
