> Astrology is perhaps the most ancient subject and also in a way the
> most ignored. It is the most ancient because astrology has been in

> as far back as we have been able to investigate the history of mankind.
> Astrological inscriptions have been found on bone remnants from the

> civilization, which existed twenty-five thousand years before Jesus. Bone
> remnants have been discovered with astrological inscriptions and with an
> outline of the moon's orbit in the sky.
>
> But in India this science is even older. In the Rigveda reference is
> made to a certain constellation of the stars, which could only have

> ninety-five thousand years ago. Because of this, Lokmanya Tilak concluded
> that the Vedas must certainly be even more ancient: the constellation of

> stars as the Vedas describe it could only have occurred at a certain

> ninety-five thousand years ago; so that particular vedic reference must be
> at least ninety-five thousand years old.
>
> That particular vedic reference could not have been added at a later
> period. Other, younger generations would not have been able to work out a
> constellation that existed many years before. But now we have scientific
> methods, which we can use to discover where the stars were at a particular
> moment in the distant past. The deepest laws of astrology were first
> discovered in India. In fact it was only because of astrology that
> mathematics was born. To make astrological calculations, first mathematics
> was needed.
>
> The digits used in arithmetic were invented in India - the numbers

> to ten, which exist in all the world's languages, are basically Indian in
> origin. And throughout the world the decimal system has been accepted: the
> decimal system was born in India, and it slowly spread throughout the

> world. When you say nine in English, it is simply a modification of the
> Sanskrit word nav. When you say eight in English, it is simply a
> modification of the Sanskrit word aht. The numerals one to nine, prevalent
> in all the world's languages, came into existence only because of the
> influence of Indian astrology.
>
>
> The first knowledge about the existence of astrology reached the
> Sumerian civilization from India.
>
>
> Six thousand years before Jesus, the Sumerians were the first to

> the doors of astrology to the Western world. The Sumerians laid the
> foundation for the scientific study of the constellation. They constructed

> gigantic tower, seven hundred feet tall, and from that tower Sumerian
> priests used to observe the sky twenty-four hours a day. Sumerian
> metaphysicians soon learned that whatever happens to mankind is somehow
> ultimately connected with the stars ? they are the source.
>
> Six thousand years before Jesus, it was the view in Sumeria that
> whenever illness occurs, whenever epidemics are born, the stars are

> connected. These days there is a scientific basis for this view. And those
> who understand the science of astrology today say it was the Sumerians who
> began the history of mankind.
>
> In 1920, a Russian scientist, Chijevsky, investigated this matter
> deeply and discovered that every eleven years enormous explosions take

> on the sun. Every eleven years a nuclear explosion occurs on the sun.
> Chijevsky discovered that whenever such nuclear explosions occur on the

> wars and revolutions begin on Earth. According to him, during the past

> hundred years, whenever such phenomena have occurred on the sun, there

> been disasters on Earth.
>
> Chijevsky's analysis was undeniable and, because it went against the
> Marxist viewpoint, in 1920 Stalin had him arrested and thrown into prison.
> Only after Stalin's death could Chijevsky be released. For Stalin,

> 's conclusions must have seemed very strange. According to Marxist and
> communist thinking, whatever revolutions occur on the Earth are
> fundamentally caused by economic differences between men. But Chijevsky
> declared that the cause of revolutions is the explosions happening on the
> sun.
>
>
> How can explosions on the sun possibly be related to the existence

> poverty or wealth in the lives of men?
>
>
> If Chijevsky's thesis is correct, then Marx's entire system
> disintegrates into dust. Then you cannot explain revolutions any longer in
> reference to economics and class struggle; then only astrology can explain
> revolution.
>
> Chijevsky could not be proved wrong. His calculation covering seven
> hundred years was so scientific, the connection he established between
> explosions on the sun and phenomena on the Earth was so close, that to

> him wrong was difficult. But to send him to Siberia was a simple matter.
>
> After Stalin's death Khrushchev released Chijevsky from Siberia.
> Nearly fifty valuable years of this man's life were lost in Siberia. After
> his release he only lived another four to six months, but in those few
> months he gathered together even more evidence for his thesis. He also
> linked the spread of epidemics on the Earth to solar influence.
>
> The sun is not a static ball of fire as we ordinarily think, but
> rather an infinitely alive and dynamic, fiery organism. The sun changes

> mood every moment. And when the sun changes its mood even a little, life

> Earth is affected. Nothing happens on the Earth without something

> on the sun. When there is a solar eclipse, the birds in the forest stop
> singing twenty-four hours before. During the entire time of the eclipse

> whole Earth becomes silent. The birds stop their singing and all of the
> animals in the forest become oppressed and frightened, full of

> The monkeys abandon their trees and come down below. They form themselves
> into groups, apparently as a means of protection. And it is a surprising
> thing that these monkeys, who are always gossiping and making a hue and

> become so quiet at the time of the eclipse that even meditators cannot
> compare with them.
>
> Chijevsky explained this entire matter, but such thinking first
> originated in Sumeria. Afterwards, a Swiss physician named Paracelsus
> discovered more information. He made an unparalleled discovery - and this
> discovery will transform all of medical science, if not today then

> Up until now this discovery could not be considered valid because

> is such an ignored subject - the most ancient, the most ignored, and the
> most respected at the same time.
>
> Last year in France, it was calculated that forty-seven percent of

> population believes that astrology is a science.
>
>
> In America, five thousand leading astrologers are currently at work
> night and day.
>
>
> They have so many clients that they can never finish their work
> properly - Americans pay millions of dollars yearly to astrologers. It is
> estimated that throughout the world, seventy-eight percent of people

> in astrology. The seventy-eight percent who believe in astrology belong to
> the general public. Thinkers and intellectuals are on red alert at the

> mention of astrology.
>
> C. G. Jung said that university doors have been closed to astrology
> for three hundred years, but that in the coming thirty years these doors
> will again open and astrology will enter the university. It will happen
> because claims that astrology has made, which have up to now been

> can now be proved.
>
> Paracelsus gave birth to one discovery - that man becomes ill only
> when the harmonious relationship between himself and the constellation of
> stars at his birth somehow breaks down. For this, a little explanation is
> necessary. Many years before Paracelsus, some six hundred years BC,
> Pythagoras gave birth to the very valuable principle of planetary harmony.
> When Pythagoras proclaimed this principle in Greece he had just returned
> from a journey to Egypt and India. At the time when he came, India was
> intensely absorbed in the ideas of Buddha and Mahavir. After his return to
> Greece, he included in his reports a specific reference to Buddhist and
> Jaina monks. He gave the Jaina monks the name Jainosophists, and also
> reported that they walk about naked.
>
>
> Pythagoras believed that every star, every planet and every

> gives out a unique vibration through its movement as it travels in space.
>
>
> Every movement of the stars gives out a vibration, and every star

> its own individual movement. All the vibrations of the stars together make

> musical harmony, which he called the harmony of the universe.
>
> When you are born, the melody that is created by the tuning of the
> stars at that time is inscribed on your mind in its freshest, most
> unsophisticated, and most sensitive state ? that of birth. Throughout your
> life this will cause good health or ill health. When you live in tune with
> the original musical harmony that existed at the time of your birth, then
> you are healthy. And whenever your tuning with this fundamental musical
> harmony breaks down, you become ill.
>
> In this connection Paracelsus has done very significant work. He

> not prescribe medicine to any patient until he had seen his kundali, his
> astrological birth chart. And it is a surprising thing that after having
> examined a patient's birth chart, Paracelsus would cure patients who had
> confused other physicians - patients who could not be cured by any other
> physician. He used to say, "Until I know the position of the stars at the
> time of this man's birth, it is not possible to know the notes of his

> harmony. And unless I know the arrangement of his inner harmony, how can I
> make this man healthy?"
>
> But what is meant by health? This we must try to understand.
> Ordinarily, if we ask a physician what the definition of health is, he

> only say that health is the absence of sickness. But this is a negative
> definition. It is unfortunate that we must define health in terms of
> illness. Health is a positive thing, a positive state; illness is

> Health is our nature; illness is an attack on nature. So it is very

> that we must define health in terms of illness. To define the host in

> of the guest is very strange.
>
>
> Health coexists with us; illness comes occasionally.
>
>
> Health accompanies us at birth; illness is a superficial phenomenon.
> But if we ask a physician to define health, he can only say that health is
> present when illness is absent.
>
> Paracelsus used to say that this interpretation is wrong - the

> of health needs to be positively defined. But how can we reach a positive
> definition, an interpretation of the concept of health that will be
> creative?
>
> Paracelsus used to say, "Until the state of your inner harmony is
> known, you can at best only be released from your illness ? because your
> inner harmony is the source of your health. But when you are released from
> one illness you will immediately get another, because nothing has been

> about your inner harmony. Your inner harmony has to be supported."
>
> Five hundred years have passed since Paracelsus, and his discoveries
> disappeared into oblivion. But now, during the past twenty years,

> has re-emerged. During this time a new science has been born. I will
> describe this new science a bit, and then you will be able to understand

> ancient science of astrology more easily.
>
> In 1950, a new science was born called cosmic chemistry. The
> originator of this science is Georgi Giardi, one of the most significant

> of the century. After endless experiments in the laboratory, this man

> scientifically that the whole universe is an organic unity ? that the

> universe is one body. If my finger is hurt, then my whole body is

> The body means that no limb is separate, all are joined together. If my

> is in pain, then my big toe also experiences that pain. If my foot is

> the message reaches the heart. If my mind is ill, my entire body will be
> disturbed. If my whole body is destroyed, then it will be difficult for my
> mind to find anywhere to be. The body is an organic unity: touch a single
> part and the whole body vibrates; all parts are affected.
>
>
> Cosmic chemistry says that the entire cosmos is a body.
>
>
>
>
>
> Nothing in it stands alone, all things are joined together. So no
> matter how distant a star may be from us, when it changes, our heartbeats
> also change. And no matter how far away the sun may be, when it becomes

> disturbed our blood circulation is also disturbed. Every eleven years an
> atomic storm occurs on the sun. The last time such a great atomic storm

> fiery explosions were going on, a Japanese doctor named Tamatto made an
> amazing discovery. This doctor had been doing work on women's blood for
> twenty years. There is one property unique to female blood which is absent
> in the blood of males. At the time of menstruation the blood of women
> becomes thin, but men's blood always remains the same. Women's blood at

> time of menstruation grows thin; at the time of pregnancy also their blood
> grows thin. According to Tamatto, this is the one basic difference between
> the blood of men and women. But when atomic energy storms were occurring

> the sun with great intensity, the blood of men also grew thin. This was a
> very novel phenomenon. Before this it had never been recorded that men's
> blood was affected by disturbances on the sun. And if blood can be so
> affected, then anything can be affected.
>
> There is an American thinker, Frank Brown, who has been working on

> safety and facility aspects of space travelers. For half his life, he has
> made it his task to ensure that the men who travel into space will face no
> difficulty. The most serious problem is how they will be affected as they
> leave the Earth. No one knows how much atomic radiation they may encounter
> or how it may affect them.
>
> For two thousand years after Aristotle, in the West it was thought
> that space is empty, that nothing is there: two hundred miles away from
> Earth the atmosphere ceases and there is empty space. But the

> of space travelers have proved this notion to be wrong. Space is not

> it is very full. It is neither empty nor dead - it is extremely alive.
>
> The truth is that the two-hundred mile wide layer of the Earth's
> atmosphere prevents many harmful influences from reaching us. But in space
> all kinds of strange currents are flowing, the effects of which man may

> be able to withstand.
>
> You will be surprised to learn this, and you will laugh, but before

> would let a man be sent into space, Frank Brown sent a potato into space.

> was Brown's contention that there is very little essential difference
> between a man and a potato. If the potato rots, then man cannot survive;

> the potato survives, then man may also survive. The potato is a very hardy
> organism, and man is very sensitive. If even a potato cannot survive in
> space, then there is no hope of survival for man. If a potato returns

> and if it sprouts after being sown in the ground, then man can be sent

> space. However, there would still be concern about man's ability to

>
> From his experiment Brown proved one more thing - that a potato seed
> lying in the ground, or any seed lying in the ground, grows only in

> to the sun. The sun alone arouses it and encourages it to emerge. The sun
> alone summons the embryo plant and induces its growth.
>
> Brown also did research in another field. This other subject has

> now not been given a suitable name, but at present it is called planetary
> heredity. There is another word in English, horoscope, which comes from

> Greek horoscopos. The meaning of the word horoscopos is: I observe the
> emerging planets.
>
>
> At the moment a child is born, many stars are emerging all around

> Earth's horizon.
>
>
> Just as the sun rises in the morning and sets in the evening, so

> rise and set in space twenty-four hours a day. If a child is being born at
> six o'clock in the morning, at that time the sun too is rising. At that

> some stars are also rising, and other stars are setting. Some

> are ascending, some constellations are on the decline. This child is being
> born into a certain arrangement of stars in space.
>
> Up until now we have doubted - and even now many people not deeply
> familiar with the subject still doubt - that the moon and stars can have
> anything to do with man. Wherever the stars may be, what difference will

> make to some child being born in a village? And then too, on the same

> under the same constellation, not just one child but thousands of children
> are born.... Among these one may become the president of some country, but
> the remainder will not. Among these one may die after one hundred years,

> another after two days. Among these one will be a genius and one will be

> idiot. So from a superficial viewpoint, one might ask how a child can be
> related to a horoscope just by being born under a certain constellation

> planetary pattern.
>
> The logic of such a question seems clear and direct: Why would the
> stars be concerned with the birth of a single child? And then also, not

> one child is born; under the very same stars many are born who are not all
> alike. From such logic it seems that the birth of a human being has no
> connection with the stars.
>
> But from the investigations of Brown, Picardi, Tamatto and others,

> can draw a great conclusion. All these scientists say that while we cannot
> yet claim that a child as an individual is influenced by the stars still

> can now say for certain that life as a whole is affected. Whether a child

> influenced as an individual we cannot now say or know, but life as a whole
> is. And if life as a whole is, then as we investigate the facts of the
> matter more deeply, we will discover that the individual too, is affected

> the stars.
>
> One thing more must be considered. It has been thought that

> is a science which, because it originated in an earlier time, could not
> develop. But in my view the situation is just the opposite. Astrology was

> infinitely developed science in some extremely advanced civilization, but
> that civilization has been lost and only incomplete fragments of its
> astrology have remained in our hands.
>
>
> Astrology is not a new science which needs to be developed, but a
> science which was at one time very advanced.
>
>
> Then the civilization which developed it was lost. Civilizations

> and go every day; the fundamentals, the basic sayings and the basic
> principles of those things which have been developed by them, become lost.
> Today, science is approaching the point where it will accept the thesis

> life as a whole is affected by the movements of the stars.
>
> At the time of birth, the condition of a child's mind is exactly

> a very sensitive photo plate. Two or three things need to be thought about
> if we want to understand how life is affected. And only if life is

> can there be the possibility of astrology - not otherwise.
>
> We should try to understand the phenomenon of twins. Two types of
> twins exist: One is identical twins - those who are born from one egg; the
> other type is of those who, although they are twins, are born from

> eggs - in the mother's womb two eggs become fertilized, and two children

> born. The first type is more rare - two children from one egg. They are

> significant subjects to study because they are born at the same time. Out

> necessity we call the children born from separate eggs twins, but the

> of their birth is not exactly the same.
>
> It must be understood that birth is an ambiguous phenomenon. The

> aspect of birth is conception - the actual birth takes place on the day

> the foetus is conceived in the mother's womb. This is the actual birth.

> you call birth is really birth number two - when the child comes out of

> mother's womb.
>
> If we were to carry out a complete astrological investigation - as

> Hindus alone have done, and done very thoroughly - then our actual concern
> would not begin when the child is born. Our actual concern begins when the
> child starts its journey in the mother's womb, when the conception takes
> place - because that is the actual birth. So Hindus have also come to feel
> that if a particular type of child is to be born, it will be born if
> intercourse and pregnancy occur under an arrangement of planets and
> constellation most suitable for that type. Now I will explain to you a
> little of the background of this, because much work has been done in this
> area and many things have become clear.
>
> Ordinarily, when a child was born at six o'clock in the morning, we
> thought that the constellation which existed at that time influences the
> child. But those who know astrology deeply say that the stars do not cast
> their influence over a child just because it is born at six o'clock in the
> morning. No, rather, the child chooses to be born under those stars which
> will influence him as he wishes to be influenced. This is a radically
> different thing.
>
>
> When the child is taking birth, it chooses the planets and stars,

> the moment at which it will take birth.
>
>
> And if we go still more deeply, then the child also chooses the time
> of its conception.
>
> Every soul chooses its own time of conception - when it will accept

> womb, at which moment. The moment of conception is not insignificant. It

> significant in that it is a question of how the entire universe exists at
> that moment, and to what sort of possibilities the universe opens the door
> at that moment.
>
> When two children are conceived together from one egg, then the

> of their conception is the same and the moment of their birth is the same.
> It is interesting that the lives of the two children who have taken birth
> from one egg are so alike, that it is difficult to say that the moment of
> birth has no influence. The IQ of twins born from one egg is just about
> equal. And those who know, say that the fractional difference which arises
> is because of our faulty measuring devices. Even today we have not been

> to develop adequate criteria by which we can quantitatively measure
> intelligence.
>
> If twins born from the same egg are brought up far apart from each
> other, their IQs still do not differ. Even if one child is raised in India
> and another in China, and neither is aware of the existence of the other,
> this will still be true. Cases have occurred where such twins have been
> raised far apart from each other until they have attained maturity, but
> their IQs did not differ. It is surprising that the IQ can be associated
> with the child's potential at birth.
>
> When the twin who lives in China suffers from a cold, at that time

> twin in India also suffers from a cold. Generally, twins born from one egg
> die in the same year. At the most, three years elapse between their

> and at the least, three days - but never more than three years. If one

> has died, then we can assume that after three days or within three years

> other will die. Their attitudes, their behavior, their feelings are
> parallel, and it seems that the two live in almost exactly the same way.
> Their similarity is seen in many other things also - each acts like a copy
> of the other.
>
> Everyone's skin is individual. If my hand is damaged and new skin
> needs to be grafted, then your skin cannot be grafted onto my hand; it

> be necessary to use a piece of my own skin. On the entire Earth, there

> be no one whose skin can be grafted onto my hand. My body will give signs

> rejection; it will not accept another's skin. However, the skin of twins
> born out of one egg can be transplanted. This is the only exception. If

> skin of one is grafted onto the skin of the other, the other's body will

> reject it. Why is that? What is the cause? We cannot say that it is

> they have the same parents, because even though two brothers may have the
> same parents, their skins are not interchangeable. The only exception is
> found in those children who were conceived at the same moment. Even

> them no other common factor exists.
>
> Their brothers also came from the same mother and father, but their
> skins cannot be interchanged