>> RAK, dont read, you are only interested in new things.
>
> Since this post is posted to soc.culture.hongkong (and I helpfully X-
> posted to hk.politics too), well, how's the above qualitatively
> different from the modern cheap public housing cages offered in
> *modern* Hong Kong? Here's a comparable interior look:
>
> Â Â Â http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1378/1139110628_93a37dd8ca.jpg?v=0
>
> The building philosophy your link quoted and other similarites are
> uncanny.
>
> Shouldn't half of Hong Kong be some heritage site too now? And if not
> now as some are averse to modernity, then couple centuries from now?