|
|
Up |
|
|
  |
|
Author: abianchenabianchen Date: Jul 7, 2008 16:37
|
| |
|
| | 5 Comments |
|
  |
Date: Jul 7, 2008 17:29
It is more important for the Chinese themselves should treasure the heritage
sites. UNESCO or no UNESCO, it will be sad if the Chinese themselves don't
treasure it, instead exploit it for money.
my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:e1a1f86f-7595-4ac8-a991-9bca59bc1947@34g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
  |
Author: RichAsianKidRichAsianKid Date: Jul 8, 2008 22:53
On Jul 7, 7:37 pm, "abianc...@ my-deja.com" my-deja.com>
wrote:
Since this post is posted to soc.culture.hongkong (and I helpfully X-
posted to hk.politics too), well, how's the above qualitatively
different from the modern cheap public housing cages offered in
*modern* Hong Kong? Here's a comparable interior look:
http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1378/1139110628_93a37dd8ca.jpg?v=0
The building philosophy your link quoted and other similarites are
uncanny.
Shouldn't half of Hong Kong be some heritage site too now? And if not
now as some are averse to modernity, then couple centuries from now?
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: abianchenabianchen Date: Jul 9, 2008 13:01
Very soon tacky RAK will propose Luxor Hotel Las Vagas as world
heritage site. Haha!
http://www.luxor.com/
On Jul 9, 1:53 am, RichAsianKid hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 7, 7:37 pm, "abianc...@ my-deja.com" my-deja.com>
> wrote:
>
>> UNESCO just announced 7 new UNESCO world heritage sites...
|
| Show full article (1.08Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
|
|
RELATED THREADS |
  |
|
|
|