Re: 霉國民主造成的金融危機係世紀大災難
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
soc.culture.hongkong only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: 霉國民主造成的金融危機係世紀大災難         

Group: soc.culture.hongkong · Group Profile
Author: ltlee1
Date: Sep 14, 2008 23:11

On Sep 15, 12:16 am, bakyimsing nomail.com> wrote:
> How about china?

My comment is based on the following article.

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/lehman-crumbles-wall-street-turns/story.aspx...

"Was it almost 10 years ago when after the bailout of Long-Term
Capital Management when Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan waved
off lawmakers trying to rein in hedge funds?
Was it during the past five years when the rampant practice of
securitizing mortgages took responsibility out of the loan-making
game?
Was it the expiration of the uptick rule that allowed short sellers to
drop rumors like matches on the gasoline of market panic?"

Yes, yes, and yes. Behind these "yes" is moral irresponsibility.

"It's about time someone put moral hazard back on the industry. And
what's Wall Street doing with it? Punting, of course."

"On Wall Street they like to dazzle you with big numbers. Private
equity giant Blackstone Group LP (C:Citigroup, Inc
News, chart, profile, more C 17.96, -0.65, -3.5%%) has $120 billion in
assets under management. Its chief, Steven Schwarzman, cashed in
nearly a half a billion dollars after the firm's public offering. But
neither could spend $1 on Lehman. "

Hypocrisy according to the writer of the article.

"Dick Fuld, the soon-to-be former chairman and chief executive of
Lehman, and Jimmy Cayne, the former CEO of Bear Stearns, tried to
outdo each other with compensation. "

What do these leaders care except their own benefits?

"The employees of these firms aren't much better. They can't figure
out why the market has lost confidence in their eggshell companies
built on mountains of combustible derivatives. They scowl at
journalists, pay coffee vendors not to serve reporters who make a
fraction of what brokers do. They blame the media for their woes, not
their banking counterparts who have cold feet."

Where is their sense of being responsible?

"The mantra we've operated under since the Reagan administration has
been allowing deregulation to flower and counting on the marketplace
to discipline players in that marketplace," Hayes said. "Without
having the heavy hand of government regulation carrying that role" the
market failed. "

Adam Smith's invisible hand only work if guided by morality.
>
> 不單止是雷曼兄弟和美林﹐連AIG保險公司都死。
> 問題是他們的房屋債卷資產如果跌幅過多﹐就要
> 將賬面蝕水報銷。好似房屋債卷﹐可能都未必有
> 問題﹐不過市場不看好﹐於是價值超低。但是如果
> 價值超低﹐資產要大幅度報銷﹐反映資產實價。公
> 報後﹐變成資產不夠﹐信用評級等會降低﹐借錢
> 利益提高﹐不能集資。唔死都唔得。絕對有可能這
> 些債卷﹐如果(才查)足三十年﹐虧損率可能只有百
> 份之十上下。
>
> http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=amE9cvUPd30A&refe...
>
> 反觀祖國金融機構秘秘密密﹐根據我上次貼的國內
> 樓宇貸款文章﹐根據經濟學家唐柏橋講﹕http://big5.soundofhope.org/programs/162/104527-1.asp
>
> 2008年9月11日 星期四 節目長度:3分 下載mp3
>
> 唐柏橋【錄音】:房地產市場一定會全面崩潰,我們可以以一
> 個簡單的原理,知道就是北京上海的房地產價格達到了紐約
> 水平,比美國絕大多數的地方還要高,但是中國的人均收入
> 是美國的十分之一不到,二十分之一差不多,他的真正收入
> 那麼低,為什麼能買那麼高的房產,就是一批人在炒,中國
> 人民銀行現在可動用的資金只有140億,總共存款可能有上
> 萬億,這些錢到哪裡去了,
>
> _______________________________\
>
> 中國人民銀行現在可動用的資金只有140億﹐不過中國總
> 存款額可能過萬億。能動用的資金只有存款額的1%%。那麼
> 大部分存款變成貸款資產貸到那裡呢﹖是否供應上海﹐北
> 京﹐廣東的超貴樓宇豪宅興建之用呢﹖
>
> 上海樓市全盛時期﹐根據德國之聲說﹐一個上海的地產
> 總值就超過霉國整個國家的地產市值。現在祖國全國地產
> 價值跌差不多40%%﹐祖國的銀行和金融機構﹐這包括紅
> 籌龍頭平安人壽﹐應否如霉國一樣要公開撇帳﹐減低其
> 資產價值呢﹖
>
>
>
> ltlee1 wrote:
>> A sign of moral vacuum.
>
>> On Sep 14, 8:54 pm, s...@tpsur.net (大吹法螺) wrote:
>>> 格老:金融危機百年僅見[07:46]
>>> 2008年9月15日
>
>>> 美國聯儲局前主席格林斯潘表示,現時美國面對的金融危機是百年僅見的。
>
>>> 格林斯潘指出,現時的危機是他見過最嚴重的,料仍會持續一段時間,並會繼續影響美國樓價。
>>> 他認為美國能避過經濟衰退的機會不足五成。
>
>>> 他又預計會有更多大型金融機倒閉,是好是壞就要看當局如何處理。但他認為政府毋須出手拯救
>>> 所有機構。(法新社)
>
>>> =================================
>>> →民主詐財犯人權,多行不義終自斃←
>>> =================================
>
>>> -- Posted on news://freenews.netfront.net - Complaints to n...@netfront.net --- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!