Dr. Pao,

I'm a late comer to SCH/SCL and I think you and others who have
launched SCH/SCL, but I was wondering if there's a way for you and
others to re-create SCH/SLC to mandate real identifiable names only
and no alias usage? I have learned quite abit from all threads
regardless of their nature. However, I would like the world to see
more of the nature of our culture and not the nature of our personal
acculturated self. Preferred SCH/SCL for me should be as follow:

1. Member need to be invited or approved by SCH/SCL outstanding
committee;
2. There should be a committee/advisory group set up to monitor the
daily course of SCH/SCL; and
3. All SCH/SCL thread needs to be approved prior to being posted

Hope it can be done to better serve the image of the communities...

Ua tsaug,

-Txiabneeeb
On Sep 14, 6:23 am, DownUnder dex.hmoob.net> wrote:

Sabaydii Tzianeng et all,
Soon after SCL was created (before SCH) we pondered on the same points you
are talking about and taking a lead from Singapore.Moderated we submitted
for a creation of Laos.moderated but we failed by only in the teens of vote,
not within our community as we always lobby first. The vote was lost due to
external/outsider freedom of speech/rights groups voting againts the idea.
Anyone can propose to set a group it is just a process, groups are created
everyday.

What you are asking for exist today in the form or private discussion boards
e.g. mailling lists and webboards where the site and members define the
rules of engagement and whether moderators are needed.

SCL, SCH,SHT etc. are open forums where everything go, no moderator, no ID
check (except big brother CAN/DO track you down). NETethics guide such as
referred to by Pao is a rule of chaos, we self govern and self control,
common sense, consensus and respect(for self & others) rule, the abusers
just abuse themselves.

Houmphanh, I agree with your assessment of the overall of these two
forums SCL/SCH. As for Txiabneeb, I agree with him on somewhat extend,
such that we can always create a new group somewhere in this net
world. I believe that the sooner we agree with each other, then the
forum would just died down. With that say, as the rate of heat in
these two forums—we had seen more materialistic and information than
ever, from every inch of our skeletons.

Since I was here, to nowadays I had experienced and learned more, from
the so many, not only good ideals and ideas, as well as personality,
trait, and characteristics as a human being.

Born2beMhong

On Sep 15, 7:37 pm, "Houmphanh Thongvilu" Lao.Net> wrote:

Houmphanh and all,

I agreed in regard to "Freedom of Speech," but the group names of SCL/
SCH should contain and pertain to only realistic and identifiable
sources only...that's just my take on it; I am most open to "Freedom
of Speech" but that's should be under another group name and with such
for the idiotic bashings does not resonate any means or form of the
socialization and cultural integrity of the Hmong and Lao...it's
simply a wish, maybe a personal wish...

Thanks for the reply...

-Tzianeng

On Sep 15, 7:37 pm, "Houmphanh Thongvilu" Lao.Net> wrote:

I agree. As the wrestling ring announcer said: "The rules are no rules!"

On Sep 16, 4:14 pm, Sahai Mak Muan yahoo.com> wrote:

I agree, now my openly question for
Sahai Mak Muan is: do you think Dr. Pao
at down under did his own prostate check?

?????? ????????? wrote:

The ANSWER is NO ANSWER :-D

ລາວພວນ ລາວຮັກຊາດ wrote:

On Sep 16, 4:14 pm, Sahai Mak Muan wrote:

I agree. As the wrestling ring announcer said: "The rules are no rules!"

Tzianeng Vang et. al.,

Houmphanh & BBH have provided the salient response that I totally
agree.
When SCH was about to be go to voting, many people had concern that
SCH would be out of control but at then end, we alll agreed that
common sense would prevail and we are confident that there are enough
people, among ourselves. who have a genuine heart to better our people
- and these people would be the ones that would steer these two forums
toward the dream and the visions that we envisaged.

Looking back, SCL has gone on air fro 15 years and SCH just over 10
years and these two forums remain the most dynamic forums of all the
100's - if not 1000's of private forums (Houmphanh & I had set up more
discussion forums than any one else -- and most have died of... only a
few still have the occ heart beat! and the odd posting every now and
then).. SCH/SCL just keep going and goping, years after years...

On Sep 18, 5:20 am, DownUnder dex.hmoob.net> wrote:

ບັກໝາຕື່ນຕົດ..ບັກໝາບ້າຍົດ..ບັກໝາຕື່ນຕົດ..ບັກໝາບ້າຍົດ..ບັກໝາຕື່ນຕົດ
ບັກໝາຕື່ນຕົດ..ບັກໝາບ້າຍົດ..ບັກໝາຕື່ນຕົດ..ບັກໝາບ້າຍົດ..ບັກໝາຕື່ນຕົດ
ບັກໝາຕື່ນຕົດ..ບັກໝາບ້າຍົດ..ບັກໝາຕື່ນຕົດ..ບັກໝາບ້າຍົດ..ບັກໝາຕື່ນຕົດ
ບັກໝາຕື່ນຕົດ..ບັກໝາບ້າຍົດ..ບັກໝາຕື່ນຕົດ..ບັກໝາບ້າຍົດ..ບັກໝາຕື່ນຕົດ
ບັກໝາຕື່ນຕົດ..ບັກໝາບ້າຍົດ..ບັກໝາຕື່ນຕົດ..ບັກໝາບ້າຍົດ..ບັກໝາຕື່ນຕົດ
When I fart back Larry bark. ໝາຕື່ນຕົດ..ໝາເລັຍດາກແກວແນວລາວ
When I fart back Larry bark. ໝາຕື່ນຕົດ..ໝາເລັຍດາກແກວແນວລາວ
When I fart back Larry bark. ໝາຕື່ນຕົດ..ໝາເລັຍດາກແກວແນວລາວ
When I fart back Larry bark. ໝາຕື່ນຕົດ..ໝາເລັຍດາກແກວແນວລາວ
When I fart back Larry bark. ໝາຕື່ນຕົດ..ໝາເລັຍດາກແກວແນວລາວ
When I fart back Larry bark. ໝາຕື່ນຕົດ..ໝາເລັຍດາກແກວແນວລາວ
When I fart back Larry bark. ໝາຕື່ນຕົດ..ໝາເລັຍດາກແກວແນວລາວ
When I fart back Larry bark. ໝາຕື່ນຕົດ..ໝາເລັຍດາກແກວແນວລາວ
When I fart back Larry bark. ໝາຕື່ນຕົດ..ໝາເລັຍດາກແກວແນວລາວ
When I fart back Larry bark. ໝາຕື່ນຕົດ..ໝາເລັຍດາກແກວແນວລາວ
When I fart back Larry bark. ໝາຕື່ນຕົດ..ໝາເລັຍດາກແກວແນວລາວ
When I fart back Larry bark. ໝາຕື່ນຕົດ..ໝາເລັຍດາກແກວແນວລາວ
When I fart back Larry bark. ໝາຕື່ນຕົດ..ໝາເລັຍດາກແກວແນວລາວ
When I fart back Larry bark. ໝາຕື່ນຕົດ..ໝາເລັຍດາກແກວແນວລາວ
When I fart back Larry bark. ໝາຕື່ນຕົດ..ໝາເລັຍດາກແກວແນວລາວ ...