Re: thov kom nej pab kho kom tau tiag tiag
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
soc.culture.hmong only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: thov kom nej pab kho kom tau tiag tiag         

Group: soc.culture.hmong · Group Profile
Author: zhen
Date: Sep 19, 2008 20:47

teev,

is that a rhetorical question? if you truly want to discuss this
seriously, i'd be happy to hold a dialog with you. but if your
intention is to employ hit and run tactics to mock what i'm saying,
don't waste my time. i'd love to discuss this more deeply with you and
txajxab using english, as this will capture a larger audience. it's up
to you, make a gesture of good faith.

based on what you have said, you have misunderstood me 100%%.

now, we may play with semantics and say there is or there is not hmong
unity. it just depends. but against the context of what i am saying,
yes, there is division along dialect lines.
> Zhen,
>
> Let's see if I have understood your premises correctly:
>
> (1) RPA is responsible for disunity among Hmong
>
> (2) A non-RPA would bring unity to Hmong
>
> (3) Though, RPA is simpler, cause for disunity should disqualify RPA
>
> Thus, these premises need to be proven as being true of false.
>
> (1) Is RPA responsible for Hmong disunity, true or false?
>
> Answer: Even if RPA does not exist, Hmong disunity still rema
no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!