I am just a poor person so no money to go there nor desire to either, I'll
leave it to experts like you who knows best to bitch. PDM asked for proof, I
referred to the extracts that contradicts your 'DKJ says so...." CHILDISH
indeed! DKJ said "OPEN to all ", Thanouxay = "No (to few)", GOL unofficially
says "Yes" (according to Pao & Kam), Larray/PDM= "OPEN to all" I am sure in
time an official line will come out; and that will be that!!
Anyway to further end this stupid accusation see if you sign to this:
We condemn all human right abuses in:
Pan Larry PDM others....
Laos Y
Thailand Y
US & co Y
China & co Y
Russia & co Y
AU Y
Indonesia Y
France Y
England Y
etc. etc.. Y
That's want I meant in my previous limited English that my HR is a UNIVERSAL
rights as declared by the UN in the name of the world community and black is
black no grey or but... What you do is your business but stick to facts. In
fact as a US tax payer why don't you write to your representatives, you
have, good! We exercised our rights and voted out the far right gov. in AU.
"???????????"
yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:66ecfe6b-b903-40cb-b55e-7a28008186a5@n75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
On Mar 20, 3:51 am, "Pan" Lao.net> wrote:> I hate playing this childish game, please read in "Ban Phalak is killed",
> all extracted from Thanouxay's postings:
> .... This trouble maker attitude will of course always >>> be turn down
> <<<.
> What a
> shame.....
>
> .....Once again, we >>>do not need you in Phalak <<<....
>
> Sorry me know not English!
>
> plus others who reported not able to go into Bane Phalak including SK & RI
> who are respected people who would do no harm to Laos; they are waiting in
> VTE. SO! if it's "open to all" ie. "NOT closed" please advise SK & RI MoFA
> have their mobile numbers.
>
> "Phi Dung Mo"
drivelauto.com> wrote in
> messagenews:tenEj.97664$w94.67818@pd7urf2no...> Pan,>> Where has Thanouxay said it is closed? Closed to the ego maniacal Dr.
>> Pao and his egocentric group maybe,
>
> Pao is one person access is closed to.... therefore NOT OPEN TO ALL
> .... sorry me no English!
>
>
>
>>but then they are playing a game as though they are big-time HR group as
>>well. Thanouxay has stated the Ban Phalak is closed access? You're going
>>to
>>have to prove that, show me, where did he states that!
>
>> Phi Dung Mo
>
>>> Sabaydii PDM & all,
>>> Don't shoot the messenger! if I contradict DKJ reported open access to
>>> all, when Thanouxay said it's closed. Fact or fiction?!
>
>>> When I repost human rights watch report people called me names; we can
>>> not undo what the international communities say with all our talks,
>>> only
>>> GOL can act on them.
>
>>>> Your humanitarian groups are restricted from all of Laos, you can't
>>>> say they are restricted from Phalak and that makes Phalak restricted.
>>>> That is just pure stupidity. Most were also denied access by Thailand
>>>> also.
>>> This is exactly the problem lack of open and transparent process as
>>> adopted by international aid norms; if this happen in Africa people do
>>> say the same as what is happening in Dafur. When it happen in Thailand
>>> or
>>> Laos; the reports speak out as well. in fact HRW have pages on every
>>> countries in the world on human rights status; whether any country like
>>> it or not.
>
>>> What people do about it, it's up to the stakeholders.- Hide quoted
>>> text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Hey Pan, after you go visit Abu Graibe and Guantanamo Bay and take a
few pictures for us than you can come back and bitch some more. How a
bout that?
Your friend,
Larry
