| Re: Peb Hmoob txoj kev sib hlub nyob 6 tiam 21. |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: soc.culture.hmong · Group Profile
Author: pebhmoobruampebhmoobruam Date: Aug 19, 2008 04:52
> Tus kwjtij pebhmoobbrother awd,
>
> Tav twg koj tseem hais "Hmoob/Moob" los yog  "Hmong/Mong" ces tsis tas
> yuav mus hais txog lawm yam li os. This divided term renders
> everything else absurd. In other words, if we cannot agree on who we
> are, then it is logically and pragmatically absurd to attempt at
> defining what the relations between us ought to be.
>
> Teev
>
> On Aug 17, 12:38Â pm, pebhmoobr...@ yahoo.com wrote:
>
>
> >> On Aug 14, 10:20Â pm, LOM gmail.com> wrote:- Hide quoted text ->
> - Show quoted text -
Teev
You may agree or disagree but the problem of Hmong/Mong divisive
already there unless we find the solution for it. I am as a Hmong
tell out in my hearth that we alway treat the Mong as second class
that's why many Mong turn to be Hmong because the hatred we have
toward them. This word I heard from Col Hang Chao, Hang Chao said, in
Long Cheng, he was one of closing with Vang Pao so he know very well
that the Hmong treat the Mong very bad because VP was the leader so
the Hmong think they are more superiod than the Mong. He keep memtion
that from now on if we will have land or perhape authority again than
we should be separate the Hmong and Mong as two group. One Hmong sit
in the government than must be a Mong in there too.
The last and strong word he said do not allow the Hmong to use our
Mong woman dress because the good and beautiful are belong to the Mong
not the Hmong. If we see any Hmong dress the Mong dress just tell her
are you change or (khai sak) already? Well just joke. hahahah....
| 
