On Sep 5, 1:17 am, Mogee
hotmail.com> wrote:> On Sep 4, 6:11 am, ເຄຣຊີ້ແລຣີ້
yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>>> On Sep 4, 8:59 am, ເຄຣຊີ້ແລຣີ້
yahoo.com> wrote:>
>
>>> "Buck Pao,
>>> You are not going to simply misdirect the thread and wiggle
>>> out
>>> of supplying an answer as you are so famous for doing time and time
>>> again, year after year. Quit dodging! Quit lying about your level of
>>> English acuity. Quit misdirecting the thread!
>
>>> Can you explain why it is that you have never read all of Sayasith's
>>> letter? Yes, it is obvious that you have never read Sayasith's letter
>>> completely.
>
>>> Does your grade three English comprehension go along with either
>>> total blindness or an inability to read at all?
>>> Can you read for me the following quotation from Sayasith's
>>> letter:
>
>>> "Yes, the current political system in Laos is not perfect; and there
>>> is
>>> corruption within the system."
>
>>> Now I think that this single sentence goes directly to the root
>>> of
>>> your lying and all of your innuendo about the interpretation of
>>> Sayasith's comments. How do you interpret this sentence with regard
>>> to
>>> your own comments? If you want to simplify it, try breaking it apart
>>> at
>>> the commas and dealing with each part separately. This sentence is
>>> only
>>> four paragraph's below the line that you love quoting so much I think
>>> that you have it permanently burned into your computer's clipboard
>>> buffer cache.
>
>>> Does being deadly serious about all your discussions, excuse
>>> flagrant lying?
>
>>> Has your limited English comprehension kept up, Buck Pao? I don't
>>> care
>>> that you may be older than I am, you are a scared back-pedaling
>>> little
>>> man. You do not deserve any respect until you face up to your own
>>> comments and defend them with suitable responses instead of
>>> misdirecting
>>> and lying as a defense. It is amazing how your English acuity has
>>> increased so significantly as this thread has progressed. From
>>> misinterpreting simple English sentences and claiming near illiteracy
>>> to
>>> having no problems understanding my statements or comments.
>
>>> You see Buck Pao, you are a liar! A simple and plain liar, no more,
>>> no
>>> less.
>>> --
>>> Brad Velander
>>> "
>
>> Eventhough I haven't read these before, I too had come tothis
>> conclusion about Pao.
>
>> After all these years, looks like Pao is still a bag of wind.
>
>> Yourfriend,
>> ແລຣີ້- Hide quoted text -
>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> And what conclusion is that exactly? While I could very well be
> predispositioned to agree with you, I am afraid you've lost me in this
> thread.
>
> You've got only one quote that claims to be something said by Dr. Pao:
>
> "Yes, the current political system in Laos is not perfect; and there
> is
> corruption within the system."
>
> The rest of the posts and links you've supplied are testimonials and
> accusations made by other people, but without context and actual 1st
> hand sources, the evidence you have supplied amounts to not much more
> than gossip.
>
> Of course those that do not agree with him would have less than
> spectacular things to say about him. Let's stick to the things he's
> actually done or said when making a critque of him. Simpler and more
> easily demonstrable and supported, if at all.
