>
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.laos/msg/e1c3b7e7a7898ed0
>
> "Buck Pao,
> You are not going to simply misdirect the thread and wiggle
> out
> of supplying an answer as you are so famous for doing time and time
> again, year after year. Quit dodging! Quit lying about your level of
> English acuity. Quit misdirecting the thread!
>
> Can you explain why it is that you have never read all of Sayasith's
> letter? Yes, it is obvious that you have never read Sayasith's letter
> completely.
>
> Does your grade three English comprehension go along with either
> total blindness or an inability to read at all?
> Can you read for me the following quotation from Sayasith's
> letter:
>
> "Yes, the current political system in Laos is not perfect; and there
> is
> corruption within the system."
>
> Now I think that this single sentence goes directly to the root
> of
> your lying and all of your innuendo about the interpretation of
> Sayasith's comments. How do you interpret this sentence with regard
> to
> your own comments? If you want to simplify it, try breaking it apart
> at
> the commas and dealing with each part separately. This sentence is
> only
> four paragraph's below the line that you love quoting so much I think
> that you have it permanently burned into your computer's clipboard
> buffer cache.
>
> Does being deadly serious about all your discussions, excuse
> flagrant lying?
>
> Has your limited English comprehension kept up, Buck Pao? I don't
> care
> that you may be older than I am, you are a scared back-pedaling
> little
> man. You do not deserve any respect until you face up to your own
> comments and defend them with suitable responses instead of
> misdirecting
> and lying as a defense. It is amazing how your English acuity has
> increased so significantly as this thread has progressed. From
> misinterpreting simple English sentences and claiming near illiteracy
> to
> having no problems understanding my statements or comments.
>
> You see Buck Pao, you are a liar! A simple and plain liar, no more,
> no
> less.
> --
> Brad Velander
> "