ms,

nws hais raug siab es hais raug li cas maj? thov qhia seb yom? xob
ploj li hnub i es cia li tso kuv pluav txog john tucker nawb mog.

cov no yog cov ywj pheej xyooj hais/thuam (criticize) hmoob es yuam
kev.

1. nws hais tias "huab tais" vwj paj yias lawv cov phom zoo dua suav
cov, tiam si, vim li cas hmoob ho swb rog? vim hais tias "hmoob tsis
muaj nom muaj tswv." does this make sense to you? yog hmoob tsis muaj
nom muaj tswv es nws twb hais tias vwj paj yais yog "huab tais" ne?
txawv dhau hwv lawm.

2. nws thuam tias hmoob tsis xav hloov los pauv hmoob tej txuj ci.
qhov no nws xav cav li cas los tau tas. tiam si, kom nws xob ua heev
heev cem hmoob kom ti ntsa xwb ces zoo mloog lawm. he already said
this is good + bad, but then goes on to say it is so bad this and
that, which is strange. i wonder what goes into the preparation for
his shows; zoo lawv cia li lam tau lam hais tsuav hais kom haum siab
xwb ces tag li ntawv..... i unno.

3. nws thuam tias hmoob pheej tos ib tug vaj nqes los saum ntuj los
pab hmoob. good point. tiam si, tsis yog haiv hmoob ntseeg li no xwb,
tag nrho ntiaj teb feem ntau yeej ntseeg li no. i.e. cov christian/
muslims tos ntses xus, cov tibetans tos lamas. i am not really sure
what his point is if he is to smear this fundamental belief of most
people/faith, and not focus on a better alternative. as for "saub",
tej yam zoo li no, lwm haiv neeg kuj mauj tib yam thiab; xws li cov
jews/christains/muslims muaj prophets/messiahs. nws hais tias "ntau
haiv twb tso pov tseg + hla dhau los lawm" which is wrong and
incorrect. where is this guy getting his information? tremendous
distortion.

4. "ntseeg me nyuam yug los txawv txawv." this is not just "chinese"
or "hmong", but also "india". remember, just recently, in india, a
girl was born with multiple legs, and she was revered as one of the
gods reincarnate. call it primitive belief, but this is not a
"primitive" belief. even in science, we look for "outliers" to
understand how to make breakthroughs. so, yue pheng xiong is either
ignorant or limited in his greater understanding.

these are his "guidelines" or argumentative points for improving
hmong.
1. hmoob muaj keeb kwm zoo <- yes, but, hmoob kuj muaj keeb kwm phem
thiab, thiaj li pooj teb chaws.
2. kab lis kev cai <- yes, but didn't he say to accept "change"
3. peev xwm <- yes, so what.. others have it too..
4. nrhiav haiv <- yes, but what about the mong who do not claim to be
hmong, the mong who wants to assimiliate the hmong ntsuab, etc..
etc... etc...
5. hmoob pab hmoob <- rhetoric
6. tso tseg tos lwm haiv neeg pab <- good point, but "use" others..
lis amekas siv fab kis tuav ees kiv thaum lub sij hawm american
revolutionary war
7. siv ntsis phom tsim teb chaws <- D.O.A. = dead on arrival... kav
tsij hais li no tiag, ib me ntsis FCC tuaj rho hlo license + FBI tuaj
muab caum mas yom...

yue pheng xiong gets a C- for effort.

On Aug 12, 10:33 pm, Moobsib gmail.com> wrote: