Hi Jim,
You are right about July 4 in MN.
It is all about money, pride, popularity and contest... and an
opportunity to show off on stage or on the playing field, day out to
sell, to shop, to eat and to experience the mobile toilets and the
rubbish or what you US Hmong called THASH. And intersting to meet
people.
I only attended July 4 once... I saw VP procession and crashed into
the VIP tent to take some video and pics( after making friends with
some of the guards around the tent!). VP was there... and many VIP
were there with all those uniformed men all around and few State
Police around. It was an add sight to be but I got some very good
shots. Yes.. the VPism is strong. The Force is felt all around.
Intersetingly, I met some of my relatives from Laos... then few hours
later, I met another group of family members from France, ia addition
to all other relatives from around the USA! Wow... what a place to
be.
Then... the soccer players, the Kator ectc... it is really something
but it is hard to keep track of what going on the fields.
My family and my kids were with me and there were so amaze about the
mobile toilets and the quantity of rubbish... my sons took a lots of
photo about the different types of thrash around!!!
So, it is what you make it in July 4.
There is plenty to pick and to enjoy... not just politic.
Pao
On Jul 12, 12:40 am, All4One yahoo.com> wrote:
> Dr. Pao,
>
> YES, the choice is mine...and here's where I have issue with Hmong
> politic. All I'm saying was...there are times for political
> talks....and there are times for peace and enjoyment of peace. The
> festival offers a time for peace to enjoy life...hence the name "JULY
> 4 HMONG FESTIVAL". It's a time to reflect how far we have come and
> how much we have to go yet. It's not like Hmong doesn't have event
> catering specifically for political agenda...we do have plenty of
> those events. It's just "out of place" to use such event to promote
> political issues which the majority of the event goers probably pay
> little to no attention, let alone wanted to be part of the festival. I
> think this is "jungle" politic!!! If they wanted to promote important
> issues concerning the Hmong, there are better and more effective ways
> of promoting those issues.
>
> Bottom line is...If one were to examine closely, their MAIN ADJECTIVE
> is making MONEY...they LOVE to attach important political figures
> (i.e. VP/Mee Moua/Dr. YD, etc) to draw more crowds...more crowds
> equal more uncle bens and more masions being built for these cronies,
> that's it! No wonder Hmong politic goes nowhere after 30+ years,
> because the so call "hmong leaders" only play politic for money and
> where there's money to be made, there bounds to be politic. Ua
> tsaug!
>
> Jim
>
> On Jul 10, 9:09 pm, Pao dex.hmoob.net> wrote:
>
>> Whether we like it or not, VP will remain as a factor in the Hmong
>> life for some time.
>> He is still the mover and shaker even when he was arrested and was
>> locked away. Leaders like VP, who are not elected, are not known to
>> step down - they stay on for as long as people still remember them.
>> Some leaders may even still exercise more power from their graves!!!
>
>> So... sawvdaws es... just get used to that idea of VPism.
>
>> What we need to do, and are capable of doing exceptionally well, is
>> to study the man and learn and adopt all his good traits ... and at
>> the same time, learn from his bad traits and drop all - and never to
>> repeat them . It is time to surpass him if any one has "the calling"
>> and/or the gut to step forward.
>
>> VP may not the Genghis Khan for the Hmong but he has certainly changed
>> the Hmong history for ever - that fact alone is worth pondering on!
>
>> Pao
>
>> ps. All4One... all thiongs are political movivated. You can either
>> play politic or politic play you - there is no any other way!. It is a
>> choice that YOU must make but if you do not make your own choice then
>> YOU have given your power of choice for others to make the choice FOR
>> you already. Hence... it is still tour choice!!! (think about it) -
>> so no need to complaint about it!
>
>> All4One wrote:
>>> What never cease to amazes me was the fact that...almost every major
>>> Hmong tournaments/new years are use for political reason. Don't Hmong
>>> leaders know the meaning of what a "FESTIVAL" is from a political
>>> gathering? I realized that tournaments provide the public mass, but
>>> who's really going to listen to their speeches when people are more
>>> concern about meeting up with their families and friends? At best, a
>>> few die-hard old men and their women may gather to listen to the empty
>>> words shouted through the microphones in fading hopes. The people
>>> came to enjoy the sun and the company of relatives, NOT to listen to
>>> the past 30 years of failed political effort to overthrow the LPDR.
>>> Frankly, I'm SICK of public events being politcized with the same old
>>> political speeches by the former general. It's time to move on! Hmong
>>> CANNOT wins battles, let alone a war if we can't even differentiate
>>> festival from politic. ua tsaug!
>
>>> jim
>
>>> On Jul 9, 7:21�pm, "syang...@
hotmail.com"
hotmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> after more than 30 yrs of residency in the US, one of the world most
>>>> efficient democracies, in which elections are frequently held to
>>>> evaluate leadership performance at all levels of governments, hmong
>>>> general vang pao, although he began preaching equality, opportunity,
>>>> and hmong national unity since his house arrest, neither grasps the
>>>> concept of democracy nor want to change his dictatorial attitude. in
>>>> his july 4, 2008, speech, the general asserts that "all organizations
>>>> are his" since he is the "father" of the Hmong and thus led them to
>>>> come to the US. such catch words are often spoke by communist leaders,
>>>> such Kim Il Sung, Mao Zedong, and Castro, implying that they are the
>>>> states and the states are them so that they are the rules of society
>>>> and thus control all means of production.
>
>>>> according to the law of the situation, the words might be appropriate
>>>> in communist states, but they are not appropriate in democracy. �since
>>>> a leader without policy direction to move his/her people toward growth
>>>> and prosperity in a democratic way in a world of democracy, is the
>>>> leader still effective? why or why not? if not, in what way will the
>>>> people do to choose a new leader?- Hide quoted text -
>
>> - Show quoted text -