> Tony wrote:

>> Born2beHmong,
>>
>> It seemed like you already make your acceptance speech as the man of
>> the year. What different will it make now?
>>
>> What has 2006 brought sch to and why a sudden rush to pick man of the
>> year?
>>
>> Define what had taken place in 2006 and then decide who was the man of
>> the year.

>
> Tony,
>
> I believe that you have known it better, and perhaps you must be in the
> role of leadership to understand how things play after you read my
> post...smiles! Since Pajyeeb has already given the unofficial
> recognition to me, as I am a man of wisdom and understands I would have
> to accept her recognition and to thanks her. And, as a man of
> conscious I would try to make my speech to reflect all participants, as
> to show them the true light of the good side of humanness and coming
> togetherness can achieve the greatness in SCH, or in the community
> itself, for the well being of our own race. With that speech of mine,
> it would have set a tone for all us to understand and focus to where we
> stand, but many people have failed to understand, and they still go
> right and left with an unnoticeable of the language that I put out. As
> far as you can see on my accepting post, if people cannot understand
> and able to interpret these words and wisdoms that I have said, and
> then, where would we go from here. And, that is exactly what I told
> you that we may be very educated but we are not yet having the ethical
> and professionalism within ourselves to understand the difference, that
> is why after such speech as mine we still struggled and wanted to go
> back to the initial stage of selection. After a careful reading of
> these many posts, one would understand clearly as where we are
> belonging in our own community and where we are in Hmong race.
>
> 2006 has brought back many of our previous colleagues and the memory of
> the past 10 years, and it also marked a 10 years anniversary for SCH.
>
> What have taken place in 2006 and then decide whom as the man of the
> year, gosh....a man of wisdom and knowledge should not have to question
> this very minor issue. Pajyeeb was only playing our men's minds, to
> see if we are actually real men and able understand and change our
> attitudes and behaviors, and be more partially, ethically, and
> professionally debated on issues and subjects that we posted here on
> SCH. But we men have failed her miserably..bad on us, Men...LOL! My
> speech was to tap along with Pajyeeb's idea, and hope to see if all
> us men can see the new light at the end of the other side of tunnel.
> But we men failed to see Pajyeeb's vision and goal for us in SCH, to
> have good behaviors, be educated, be ethically, be partially, and be
> professionally. Except that we Hmong/Mong/Mhong men are too arrogant
> to see this simple change of dream and vision for SCH as a virtue
> nation as Dr Pao-Oz had dream for. Aren't you seeing that we men of
> educated and professional fail to see this coming? And, this is the
> result from what I have been saying all along that we Hmong men are not
> yet educated and ethical enough or professional, but we think we
> are-don't you agree?
>
>
>
> Tseemyeej,
>
> The smiles are just for enjoyment the warmness of whatever my
> colleagues as you and many others in here put out for debates and for
> us to read. I supported of this idea of unofficial recognition is
> because it will help to open many others' eyes to see the good and bad
> side of a human being, and his/her own characters.
>
> GeNom,
>
> I would to agree with Xej, and as for Herlao, he is a fine man with
> lots of wisdom, knowledge, education but when it comes to issue within
> the norm of hmong people-he would walk himself right and left without a
> constraint fine line, another word for, as they don't walk finely and
> partially but only to what they see it fits and their own side of
> opinion without compromise or understand and see from the other side of
> another human being. Did you know why HerLao has moved away from SCH to
> SCL, because he cannot even sustained or handled issues that were
> debated by HerLao and Zhen. It goes the same to Zhen, she has a great
> knowledge and wisdom and a very good debater, but as it comes to foul
> language. She just cannot handle herself well enough that was the very
> reason that we are no longer having the nickname Zhen in SCH. Perhaps,
> you were not here very much to understand the result as to why HerLao
> and Zhen were no longer a participant of SCH, don't get me wrong they
> both are very educated people, and have lots of potential for us hmong
> people.
>
> If I would to nominate, I would nominate Dr Pao-Oz, but that too, he is
> a person who sits along the sideline without come in forefront on the
> many debate issues from bad to good that evolved in SCH. and, then that
> too I decided that Dr Pao does not fit into it.
>
> Born2beHmong