On Mar 23, 6:33 pm, "PL"
wrote:
[snipping portions of PL's posting already debunked here, or too lame
to bother with]
>>> In the mean time Castro persues propaganda projects abroad (like donating
>>> light bulbs to people in Jamaica
>
>> [snip]
>
>> What has it been -- over a year now?
>
> (snip)
>
> Yep.
> And I have proven that Castro donated millions while the WFP was underfunded
> by less millions to feed Cuban people.
>
No you haven't. And it's not just me -- not even your mafia pals in
Miami are buying into your wacky conspiracy theory here. That's gotta
hurt!
Again, we (including your mafia pals?) are STILL waiting for your
proof that the Cuban government paid anything at all for these light
bulbs, which were made in China and also distributed cost-free to
Cuban households to conserve energy.
> Today 7%% of the Cuban people need WFP food aid while Castro hands out free
> light bulbs to Jamaicans.
>
Again, the total WFP aid amounts to only a few cents per person per
year.
> The purchase by Castro of light bulbs sent to Jamaica (U$30 million worth of
> them):
>
[snip]
Let's see your proof they paid $30 million for them. You are just
speculating here. We need proof. Might this explain why not even your
mafia pals are buying it this bullshit, Mr. Lobbyist? But you always
were a bit of a loose cannon, weren't you?
>>> HURRICANE DENNIS
>>> Castro rebuffs aid despite rising death toll, damage
>>> Cuba's damages and deaths from Hurricane Dennis keep rising -- and so
>>> does
>>> its government's resolve not to accept any help from Washington.
>
>> [snip]
>
>> We are STILL waiting for your proof that sufficient aid was not
>> obtained
>
> (snip)
>
> Easy 773,000 people needed WFP food aid until today.
>
This has nothing to do with hurricane aid. Again, we are STILL waiting
for your proof that sufficient hurricane aid (emergency rations,
building materials etc.) was not received from other sources.
>>> On the economical disaster:
>
>>> The disaster is now "irrevocable"
>
>>> Jul 4th 2002 | HAVANA
>>> From The Economist print edition
>
>> [snip]
>
>> That was 5 years ago.
>
> (snip)
>
> and nothing has changed.
>
They have changed, according to The Economist anyway
