> Larry wrote:

>> "_ Prof. Jonez _" jonez.net> wrote:

>>> Larry wrote:

>>>> "_ Prof. Jonez _" jonez.net> wrote:

>>>>> Larry wrote:

>>>>>> In article rac1.wam.umd.edu>, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab)
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>

>>>>>>> In article
>>>>>>> earthlink.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net>, Larry
>>>>>>> y.com> wrote:

>>>>>>>> "_ Prof. Jonez _" jonez.net> wrote:

>>>>>>>>> tjab wrote:

>>>>>>>>>> Larry y.com> wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>> "_ Prof. Jonez _" jonez.net> wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>> Larry wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article rac3.wam.umd.edu>, tjab@wam.umd.edu
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (tjab) wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kent Wills gmail.com> wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9 Jun 2008 11:07:19 -0400, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _ Prof. Jonez _ jonez.net> wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kent Wills wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9 Jun 2008 01:02:59 -0400, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kent Wills gmail.com> wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 8 Jun 2008 15:40:32 -0600, "_ Prof. Jonez _"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jonez.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "I never mentioned New York? That's so
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> demonstrably false I'm still laughing. Anytime I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> speak in anything resembling a specific, I make it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clear that I'm referring to NY statutes. I've
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> never claimed to know the details of criminal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> statutes in other jurisdictions." -- Larry Glasser
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pathological Liar

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you offer evidence to prove your claim that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Larry who posts is Larry Glasser?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have seen evidence that gives reason to suspect
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> he is, but you've listed Larry Glasser as being the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> author of the quote. Please present the proof you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have that they are the same person. If you prefer,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you may
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> admit you're lying
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and that,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at best, you're guessing.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd say the same about the racist posts you falsely
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> attributed to Jonez, but I'd leave off the 'at best
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you're guessing part,' seeing as how you were just
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flat out lying.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You've seen some, but not all, of the evidence.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're lying again, you pathological prevaricator.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Technically, Kent is a compulsive liar, not a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pathological one.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here's a bit of a racist post from your hero (MID is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> included so context can be verified. Something Jonezie
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NEVER permits):

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have no heroes on usenet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> =========

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Or you could discuss the holocaust of Native Americans
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by the invading White Man ...

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure. I for Indian or N for Native?

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> S for Savage.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Message-ID: <6b3i56F2svfk5U1@mid.individual.net>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> =========
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This still doesn't compose 100%% of the evidence, of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> course.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Comprise. Not a flame, just thought that since you claim
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be a teacher, you should know that.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> However, even you must accept that your hero is a racist.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He proudly displays it often enough.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Again, I have no heroes on usenet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jonezie:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Or you could discuss the holocaust of Native Americans
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by the invading White Man ...

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Deadrat:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure. I for Indian or N for Native?

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jonezie:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> S for Savage.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Prof. Jonez expressing his racial HATE for Native
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Americans.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I see sarcasm here, not hatred. After all, the first
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reference by Jonez is to Native Americans. The context
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> also suggests sarcasm. But Jonez has never been shy about
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expressing unpopular or politically incorrect opinions. If
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> he really does hate Native Americans I suspect he will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> post here and correct my misapprehensions.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (I suspect Deadrat also saw Jonez's comment as sarcasm,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> being as how he never challenged him on it.)

>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You don't think calling an entire race of people "Savage"
>>>>>>>>>>>>> is racist?

>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> "The Palestinians are like crocodiles ...."
>>>>>>>>>>>> -EhudBarak, Prime Minister of Israel at the time - August
>>>>>>>>>>>> 28, 2000. Reported in the Jerusalem Post August 30, 2000
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> "[The Palestinians are] beasts walking on two legs."
>>>>>>>>>>>> - Menahim Begin, speech to the Knesset,
>>>>>>>>>>>> quoted in Amnon Kapeliouk, New Statesman, 25 June 1982.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> "The Palestinians "would be crushed like grasshoppers ...
>>>>>>>>>>>> heads smashed against the boulders and walls."
>>>>>>>>>>>> - Isreali Prime Minister, Itzhak Shamir, in a speech to
>>>>>>>>>>>> Jewish settlers New York Times April 1, 1988
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> "When we have settled the land, all the Arabs will be able
>>>>>>>>>>>> to do about it will be to scurry around like drugged
>>>>>>>>>>>> cockroaches in a bottle." - Raphael Eitan, Chief of Staff
>>>>>>>>>>>> of the Israeli Defence Forces, New York Times, 14 April
>>>>>>>>>>>> 1983.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> "We have to kill all the Palestinians unless they are
>>>>>>>>>>>> resigned to live here as slaves."
>>>>>>>>>>>> - Chairman Heilbrun, Committee for the Re-election of
>>>>>>>>>>>> General Shlomo Lahat, the mayor of Tel Aviv, October 1983
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> "These people are niggers in spite of the thin varnish of
>>>>>>>>>>>> education and refinement."
>>>>>>>>>>>> - US General Littleton Waller, referring to Haitians
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> "Imagine!, Niggers speaking French!"
>>>>>>>>>>>> - US Secretary of State William Jennings Bryan, referring to
>>>>>>>>>>>> Haitians

>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You're deflecting your own racist and bigoted statements by
>>>>>>>>>>> citing racist and bigoted statements made by others 20+ years
>>>>>>>>>>> ago? Do you really think that's an effective strategy?

>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> For Jonez, probably so, since he got you to call Itzhak Shamir
>>>>>>>>>> (sp?) a racist bigot.

>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ziiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiing !

>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> By the same "ziiiiiing" token, tjab just admitted you made
>>>>>>>> racist and bigoted statements!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> But Shamir's statement was no more racist than a current US
>>>>>>>> soldier saying "we're going to crush the Sunnis and Shiites in
>>>>>>>> Iraq."

>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ""
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You don't think it's bigotry to say "we're going to crush the
>>>>>>> Sunnis and Shiites in Iraq?"

>>>>>>
>>>>>> Of course not. That's who we're fighting. Everyone understands
>>>>>> that it doesn't mean we're going to crush every one who practices
>>>>>> those religions, regardless of whether they actually oppose us or
>>>>>> not. It's just another way of saying "the enemy in this
>>>>>> particular battle."

>>>>>
>>>>> Kind of like the way the German National Socialists used the word
>>>>> Jew as "just another way of saying the enemy in this particular
>>>>> battle", eh Larry?

>>>>
>>>> No, not at all, because they used the word Jew to mean every Jew,
>>>> regardless of whether that particular human being did anything
>>>> against them or not.

>>>
>>> Riiight. Yet "every Jew" wasn't terminated, were they lyin' Larry ?

>>
>> Not for their lack of trying.

>
> Ditto for the U$ Imperialists ...