What's wrong with multi-party system
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
soc.culture.china only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

soc.culture.china Profile…
 Up
Re: What's wrong with multi-party system         


Author: rst0wxyz
Date: May 10, 2008 12:55

On May 8, 11:47 pm, Jim Walsh gmNOail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 8 May 2008 12:18:36 +0800, rst0wxyz wrote
> (in article
> <4a2f2766-d1e0-40d6-8385-a2fae6c2f...@b5g2000pri.googlegroups.com>):
>
>> On May 7, 6:10 pm, demoris...@aol.com wrote:
>>> On May 7, 6:06 am, "ltl...@hotmail.com" hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>>> my attention.
>
>>> A multi-party system allows the existence of mavericks like John "Big
>>> Mac" McCain. A single-party system and collective dictatorship does
>>> not allow for mavericks. Proof: Name one maverick in the CCP.
>
>> Deng Xiao Ping.
>
> Who was restored to power by the PLA after a decade of Maoist nonsense.
>
> And he proved his hardline credentials when he order the PLA to kill as many
> as necessary to clear the Square. ...
Show full article (0.89Kb)
no comments
Re: What's wrong with multi-party system         


Author: PaPaPeng
Date: May 10, 2008 18:57

On Sat, 10 May 2008 12:23:28 -0700 (PDT), bmoore@nyx.net wrote:
>On May 8, 3:19 pm, PaPaPeng yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, 8 May 2008 11:59:12 -0700 (PDT), bmo...@nyx.net wrote:
>>
>>>And it's not "all about the Jews" either, though that won't stop
>>>people...
Show full article (3.09Kb)
no comments
Re: What's wrong with multi-party system         


Author: Osman
Date: May 10, 2008 19:24

nyx.net> wrote in message
news:26b3705c-7fee-46bd-b68e-f22bb208f265@y38g2000hsy.googlegroups.com...
On May 8, 3:19 pm, PaPaPeng yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 8 May 2008 11:59:12 -0700 (PDT), bmo...@nyx.net wrote:
>
>>And it's not "all about the Jews" either, though that won't stop
>>people from saying that over and over.
>>It's partially about them, but as usual with this NG, people always
>>tell partial truths at the expense of the whole truth.
>
> Oh yeah. Hiliary has to lend herself another $6 million on top of the
> first $5 million to keep her run alive. I don't keep track of US
> presidential primaries campaign but the figures are in the ballpark.
> Mitt Romney lost a bundle of his own money too. So did quite a few
> other early dropouts. You tell us that it doesn't...
Show full article (1.14Kb)
no comments
1 2 3 4