The idea of worldwide population control is not new to society. Even
Aristotle discussed the subject:

Obviously, the time has come to control the world's population.

War is one way to accomplish the Bush administration's immediate goal
to reduce populations and at the same time distribute wealth and world
assets to the top members of the American community ....and It is
working for them..Also,population control makes sense to many, It must
be done soon. However, there are other humanitarian ways to do this
without the horrors of deliberate war such as in Iraq and
Afghanistan.

SEE Bush method: MOST Americans, including Democrats as well as
Republicans, who have no family member or friend in harms way
apparently approve .Otherwise, it could not happen To them war is the
health of the state..

http://www.robert-fisk.com/iraqwarvictims_page1.htm

" With the shock of war the State comes into its own again."
--- War Is the Health of the State

by Randolph Bourne
http://flag.blackened.net/revolt/hist_texts/warhealthstate1918.html

How about killing off all people over 50 "Raymond" ?
Who needs old decrepit mindless old fartsa like you?

"Raymond" aol.com> wrote in message
news:11815552-90f3-4cc7-841f-0b3e3a72ca65@p25g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...

Are you for the killings of babies ??

Raymond wrote:

Muslims are among the worlds largest producers of large families.
China has government population control.
Europe & the USA are just barely reproducing their numbers
but Muslims are swelling the world population.

"Raymond" aol.com> wrote in message
news:11815552-90f3-4cc7-841f-0b3e3a72ca65@p25g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...

Thank you for the informative and interesting original post. I agree
with you completely that population control should be a matter of
governmental mandate as it is in China. The policy in the USA and
other countries is not even "neutral" with regard to the same but
encourages irresponsible parentage thorugh socio-economic-political
policies which encourage the same. By ending such unreasonable
policies, the USA and other countries can take the first step in
discouraging the disasterous policies which encourage indiscriminate
and irresponsible parentage.

On Mon, 12 May 2008 11:13:14 -0700 (PDT), Marcus Aurelius
hotmail.com> wrote:

======================================

This are thoughts of mine which I haven't found considered or
discussed anywhere else.

Chinese parents have only one child. This includes China's top
leaders. This means there is only one chance to pass on one's DNA.
That means there is only one chance to nurture one's legacy.

On Tue, 13 May 2008 02:13:14 +0800, Marcus Aurelius wrote
(in article
m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>):

The one-child policy of the CCP is a disaster. The suffering past and future
can never be excused.

--
Love, Jim
(I often delete parts of the previous post and I often remove excessive
crossposts.)

On Tue, 13 May 2008 07:25:42 +0800, PaPaPeng wrote
(in article 4ax.com>):

Weird. Are you the poster that said China will certainly attack Taiwan if it
does not comply with the orders of the CCP?

--
Love, Jim
(I often delete parts of the previous post and I often remove excessive
crossposts.)

On Tue, 13 May 2008 13:06:40 +0800, Jim Walsh
gmNOail.com> wrote:

My post said Chinese will avoid unecessary war. This adage goes back
all the way to before Sun Tzu. But war is an unavoidable part of
sovreignity. If there is to be war it will be a sovereign's task to
conduct it competently and quickly.

On Tue, 13 May 2008 14:37:23 +0800, PaPaPeng wrote
(in article 4ax.com>):

You said that Chinese will avoid wars of choice because they have only one
child. That argument strikes me as nonsense.

Except an invasion, all wars are "of choice". You have personally threatened
Taiwan with war. That is "of choice". That makes your argument fall to
pieces.

--
Love, Jim
(I often delete parts of the previous post and I often remove excessive
crossposts.)