> The idea of worldwide population control is not new to society. Even
> Aristotle discussed the subject:
>
> Obviously, the time has come to control the world's population.
>
> War is one way to accomplish the Bush administration's immediate goal
> to reduce populations and at the same time distribute wealth and world
> assets to the top members of the American community ....and It is
> working for them..Also,population control makes sense to many, It must
> be done soon. However, there are other humanitarian ways to do this
> without the horrors of deliberate war such as in Iraq and
> Afghanistan.
>
> SEE Bush method: MOST Americans, including Democrats as well as
> Republicans, who have no family member or friend in harms way
> apparently approve .Otherwise, it could not happen To them war is the
> health of the state..
>
> http://www.robert-fisk.com/iraqwarvictims_page1.htm
>
> " With the shock of war the State comes into its own again."
> --- War Is the Health of the State
>
> by Randolph Bourne
> http://flag.blackened.net/revolt/hist_texts/warhealthstate1918.html
>
> "It seems like such a terrible shame that innocent civilians have to
> get hurt in wars, otherwise combat would be such a wonderfully healthy
> way to rid the human race of unneeded trash".
> ~Fred Woodworth
>
> The Bush family is doing what they can to reduce population. It has
> been their policy for many years. They see war, starvation and denying
> health care to the poorest citizens as a method to reduce the
> population of nations that they consider to be populated by inferior
> people.They also see civil wars (Africa example) as another means to
> accomplish population control.
>
> SEE THE BROTHERHOOD
> Part 6: Population Control
> By Ivan Fraser and Mark Beeston (http://www.truthcampaign.co.uk)
>
> http://educate-yourself.org/nwo/brotherhoodpart6.shtml
>
> Index: Eugenics | ENGINEERED WARS To Reduce
> Populations
> Eugenics
>
> War is one of the most effective ways of culling an 'undesirable'
> population,
> http://educate-yourself.org/nwo/brotherhoodpart6.shtml
>
> "To kill a man is not to defend a doctrine, but to kill a man."
> ~Michael Servetus
>
> The United Nations Population Fund claims that 37 percent of
> contraception users in Ibero-America and the Caribbean have already
> been surgically sterilized.The U.S. government pays directly for
> these
> sterilizations.
>
> Mexico is first among targeted nations, on a list which was drawn up
> in July 1991, at a USAID strategy session. India and Brazil are second
> and third priorities, respectively.
>
> On contract with the Bush administration, U.S. personnel are working
> from bases in Mexico to perform surgery on millions of Mexican men and
> women. The acknowledged strategy in this program is to sterilize those
> young adults who have not already completed their families.
>
> George H.W. Bush had a rather deep-seated personal feeling about this
> project, in particular as it pitted him against the Pope in Catholic
> countries such as Mexico.
>
> The idea of worldwide population control is not new to society. Even
> Aristotle discussed the subject:
>
> "For the proper administration of justice and for the distribution
> of authority it is necessary that the citizens be acquainted with each
> others character, so that, where this cannot be, much mischief ensues,
> both in the use of authority and the administration of justice; for it
> is not just to decide arbitrarily, as must be the case with excessive
> population."
>
> And in 1967, the United Nations addressed the potential need to
> include population control in long range planning:
>
> "We believe that the population problem must be recognized as a
> principal element in long-range planning if governments are to achieve
> their economic goals and fulfill the asperations of their people...."
>
> Retired US Senator Dale Bumpers, in a New York Times op-ed article
> (Jan.3,1999) said, "... While I'm not apocalyptic about our future,
> I'm greatly troubled by Congress's unwillingness to confront our long-
> range problems, like global warming, population growth, loss of arable
> land to development and depletion and pollution of our water supplies.
> If we continue to ignore these problems, or only deal with them
> superficially, our future will be bleak indeed."
>
> "The [government] must put the most modern medical means in the
> service of this knowledge.... Those who are physically and mentally
> unhealthy and unworthy must not perpetuate their suffering in the body
> of their children.... The prevention of the faculty and opportunity to
> procreate on the part of the physically degenerate and mentally sick,
> over a period of only 600 years, would free humanity from an
> immeasurable misfortune.''
>
> ``The per capita income gap between the developed and the developing
> countries is increasing, in large part the result of higher birth
> rates in the poorer countries.... Famine in India, unwanted babies in
> the United States, poverty that seemed to form an unbreakable chain
> for millions of people--how should we tackle these problems?.... It is
> quite clear that one of the major challenges of the 1970s ... will be
> to curb the world's fertility.''
>
> Guess who said the above?
>
> These two quotations are alike in their mock show of concern for human
> suffering, and in their cynical remedy for it:
>
> Let us now further inquire into the family background of our
> Presidents, so as to help illustrate how the second quoted author,
> George Herbert Walker Bush came to share the outlook of the first,
> Adolf Hitler
>
> The spending for birth control in the non-white countries is one of
> the few items that was headed upwards in the Bush administration
> budget. As its 1992 budget was being set, USAID said its Population
> Account would receive $300 million, a 20 percent increase over the
> previous year. Within this project, a significant sum is spent on
> political and psychological manipulations of target nations, and
> rather blatant subversion of their religions and governments.
>
> These activities might be expected to cause serious objections from
> the victimized nationalities, or from U.S. taxpayers, especially if
> the program is somehow given widespread publicity.
>
> MORE ON BUSH
> SEE;
> http://www.the7thfire.com/bush3.htm
>
> Since at least 1969, through the United Nations Population Fund
> (UNFPA), the UN has steadfastly been a leading voice in attempting to
> fund projects that provide contraception and gynecological services to
> prevent teen-pregnancy and HIV/AIDS prevention in 142 countries.
>
> UNFPA is the world's largest multionational source of population
> assistance, with programs in countries around the planet. Since it
> became operational in 1969, the Fund has provided some $5.6 billion to
> developing countries to meet reproduction health needs and support
> substantial development.
>
> Unbelievably, on July 22, 2002, GW Bush announced that the United
> States would not grant (UNFPA) the $34 million dollars appropriated by
> Congress for 2002. The decision will cost thousands of women and
> children their lives. The $34 million from the United States would
> have allowed the agency to prevent two million unwanted pregnancies
> and more than 77,000 infant and child deaths, UNFPA estimates.
>
> The politically confused Bush Administration, in withholding
> funds,accepted allegations that the UNFPA gives tacit support to
> China's one-child policy just by working in China.
>
> [The United States is the only country ever to deny fundung to UNFPA
> for non-budgetary reasons.]
>
> While the annual population growth seems to have reached a plateau,
> still the world has added 85 to 90 million people every year for the
> last decade. Each month the world adds another new York City and
> though some 300.000 Somalis died of starvation in 1992, they were
> replaced in 29 hours.
>
> Obviously, controlling the population is the answer. If nothing is
> done within the next 25 years, to bring down the rate of human
> increase, even the affluent Americans will find themselves living in
> an environment charged with miseries and an urgency to invent new ways
> to provide for not only the necessities but also the decencies of
> life. We, in America, do not need more illegals to add to our already
> struggling economy.
>
> "We have been God-like in our planned breeding of our domesticated
> plants and animals, but we have been rabbit-like in our unplanned
> breeding of ourselves."
> --- Toynbee, Arnold Joseph
>
> "People fuckee too much."
> --- Confucius
>
> America - Too Many People Already - Control Growth To Survive. Ask
> our Leaders to Secure our Borders Immediately
>
> The United States poses the most serious threat of all to human life
> support systems. It already has a gigantic population, the third
> largest on Earth, more than a quarter of a billion people. Americans
> are super consumers, and use inefficient technologies to feed their
> appetites. Each, on average, uses 11 kW of energy, twice as much as
> the average Japanese, more than three times as much as the average
> Spaniard, and over 100 times as much as an average Bangladeshi.
> Clearly, achieving an average family size of 1.5 children in the
> United States (which would still be larger than the 1.3 child average
> in Spain) would benefit the world much more than a similar success in
> Bangladesh
>
> --- Overpopulation---
> http://dieoff.org/page27.htm
>
> Illegal immigration into the United States is out of control,
> particularly across our southern border. Several members of Congress
> and Governors have declared states of emergency. The problem is not
> merely the number of illegal immigrants. In addition to the hundreds
> of thousands of illegal immigrants from Central and South America,
> there are several hundreds, perhaps thousands, of illegal aliens from
> countries that sponsor terrorism or harbor terrorists entering the
> United States each year across our border with Mexico. Thus, it is a
> national security issue as well as an immigration issue..... Until the
> border is secured and the tide of illegal immigration is stemmed,
> proposals to adjust immigration quotas, whether up or down, are doomed
> to ineffectiveness.
>
> http://www.weneedafence.com/
>
> Population Control, New World Order Style -Educate Yourself
> By Ken Adachi educate-yourself.org>
> http://educate-yourself.org/nwo/nwopopcontrol.shtml